Elsevier

Alcohol

Volume 22, Issue 1, August 2000, Pages 45-52
Alcohol

Quality of life measures and outcome in alcohol-dependent men and women

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-8329(00)00102-6Get rights and content

Abstract

A sample of 82 (41 men 41 women) DSM IV alcohol-dependent inpatients admitted for detoxification was studied at baseline and followed-up 12 weeks thereafter. The following questionnaires were administered 4–5 days after admission for detoxification: Socio-demographic information, Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ), Alcohol Problems Questionnaire (APQ), Rotterdam Symptoms Checklist (RSCL), Life Situation Survey (LSS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ 12), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). All indices other than socio-demographic data, the SADQ, and APQ were administered at 12-week follow-up. After controlling for confounding factors at baseline, women were more likely to be in a higher social class, prescribed anti-depressants during the previous 12 months, drink fewer units of alcohol in a typical week, and have a higher level of psychiatric caseness scores (GHQ-12). A total of 80 subjects (97%) were successfully followed-up. Difference between gender did not significantly impact upon any of the 12-week outcome measures. There was no significant difference in the study relapse rates or time taken to relapse between men and women. The only significant total sample change was a reduction in the amount of alcohol consumed in a typical week. This was significantly related to changes in the following Quality of Life (QoL) measures, NHP emotional reaction sub-scores, LSS, and BDI scores.

Introduction

Although the overall prevalence of drinking in women has been stable in the United States at around 60% of women between 18 and 65 for the last two decades. There has been a large increase in the amount consumed by younger women aged 18–25 (Fillmore, 1987) and alcohol-related problems are increasing in this patient group (Heltzer et al., 1988). These trends have also been repeated in the United Kingdom (Paton, 1994). As a result, the special treatment needs of alcohol-dependent women have become an increasingly important facet of addiction research and practice. A review of the development and emergence of programmes specifically designed to address the needs of women is found in Schmidt and Weisner (1995). The Swedish Karolinska Project for the Early Treatment of Women with Alcohol Addiction (EWA project) (Dahlgren & Willander, 1989) aimed to provide easily accessible treatment to women early in their drinking careers and has highlighted the strengths of women only programmes.

Although many theories have been put forward to explain the unique treatment needs of women compared to men, there is little systematic data comparing male and female alcohol misusers (Gomberg, 1993). This has led to a number of misconceptions. For example, empirical testing does not support the widespread belief that women “hide” their drinking Ferrence, 1980, Fillmore et al., 1995.

Gomberg (1993) points out those issues specifically pertaining to women. These include a greater physiological vulnerability to the effects of alcohol, in particular, hepatic diseases, child care issues, the linking of drinking to a “Significant Other”, a shorter drinking career before problematic drinking is reached, low self-esteem, and the frequent occurrence of concomitant affective disorders. When reviewing the work to date on the effects of body mass upon women, Graham et al. (1998) suggests that when the differences in drinking patterns can be assumed to be minimal, an adjustment for gender should be made if assessing the short- or long-term physiological effects of alcohol. Other recent work has focused upon the differing patterns of relapse and the link between childhood or adolescent sexual abuse and the development of dependency Jarvis et al., 1998, Spak et al., 1998. Women have been shown to take a longer period to return to heavy drinking than men (Saunders et al., 1993), and are more likely than men to relapse in the presence of “same sex friends” or “romantic partners” (Rubin et al., 1996).

In contrast, there is a literature concerning some of the characteristics which relate to alcohol-dependent men. They tend to be heavier drinkers and start drinking at an earlier age (Miller & Cervantes, 1997). Men are also more likely to develop alcohol-related illnesses by a ratio of 2.2:1 (Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health, 1995) and report more episodes of delirium tremens, blackouts and alcohol-related accidents (Rimmer et al., 1971). There are also differences concerning the precursors of treatment. It is reported that there is a higher likelihood of men seeking treatment for alcohol-related problems (Allen et al., 1998). Women are more likely to present to psychiatric services with affective disorders such as major depression and anxiety-related symptoms, while antisocial personality disorder and antisocial symptoms are more prevalent in alcohol-dependent men (Cornelius et al., 1995).

Quality of Life (QoL) has become an increasingly important outcome measure in clinical and biomedical research. It privileges the subjective judgement of the patient over objective “hard endpoints” (Longabaugh et al., 1994) such as abstinence or reduction in biochemical measures. These “hard endpoints” may have little relationship to the QoL of the patient. Thus, it becomes important to consider the subjective judgement of the patient when assessing treatment outcomes.

Over 1000 articles are indexed annually under the heading “QoL” (Muldoon et al., 1998). Yet a review of this literature (Foster et al., 1999) found only 35 articles on the Medline/BIDS databases after the words “QoL” and “alcoholics” were entered. This review found that the QoL of alcohol-dependent subjects was poor compared to general populations and that the factors that contribute to this were psychiatric co-morbidity, social environment, pain and disturbed sleep. To date, there have been only two published papers that have applied generic QoL measures in longitudinal studies; the present research group Foster et al., 1998a, Foster et al., 1998b wrote both. Another omission is that there have been no studies to date that provide any information as to whether QoL instruments measure the same constructs in men and women.

This report compares the QoL across a number of indices for men and women attending a voluntary sector alcohol detoxification unit in inner-city London, at baseline and 12-week follow-up. The aim was to ascertain the differences between the two groups and gain some insight as to the impact of gender on longitudinal outcomes.

Section snippets

Study sample and methods

This sample consisted of 82 subjects (41 men, 41 women) aged 18–65 who were inpatients at a voluntary sector alcohol detoxification unit in South London. Subjects were consecutive admissions recruited in two waves, the first from May 1994–February 1995 (39 men, 21 women) (Sample A). This group formed the sample described in Foster et al. (1998a) and the second from September 1996–August 1997 (2 men, 20 women) (Sample B). Women are traditionally under-represented in alcohol treatment services,

Socio-demographic findings

Between-group differences are shown in Table 1. Although there were no overall statistically significant differences, two variables were tested at the p<0.05 level. Men were more likely to present to treatment services from a hostel, hospital, or rehabilitation setting (χ2=11.6, df=5, p=0.041) and women were more likely to be in present employment at the time of baseline assessment (χ2=8.9, df=3, p=0.029). In addition, there was a trend for women to come from a higher social class (χ2=5.6, df

Discussion

Women are generally under-represented in treatment outcome research and many beliefs concerning the treatment needs of women are not based upon systematically collected data (Vanicelli & Nash, 1984). We have found few differences between the socially deprived men and women in our study. However, women were more likely to have a positive family history, disturbed mood, drink fewer units of alcohol prior to admission, and come from a higher social class. Difference in gender had a minimal impact

Acknowledgements

John Foster was supported by a South Thames Regional Research and Development Fellowship. Special thanks are given to all the residents and staff at the Drink Crisis Centre, Crisis and Assessment Unit, Kennington London without whose cooperation this study would not be possible.

References (45)

  • J Cornelius et al.

    Gender effects on the clinical presentation of alcoholics at a psychiatric hospital

    Comp Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • L Allen et al.

    Gender differences in factor structure of the self-administered alcoholism screening test

    J Clin Psychol

    (1998)
  • M Banks

    Validation of the General Health Questionnaire in a young community sample

    Psychol Med

    (1983)
  • A Beck et al.

    Inventory for measuring depression

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • J Beckman

    Treatment needs of women with alcohol problems

    Alcohol Health Res World

    (1994)
  • A Bowling

    Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales

    (1991)
  • R Chubon

    Development of a quality of life rating scale for use in health care evaluation

    Eval Health Prof

    (1987)
  • J Cohen

    A power primer

    Psychol Bull

    (1992)
  • Statistics on Drug Abuse in Australia 1994

    (1995)
  • E Corrigan

    Women and problem drinking notes on beliefs and facts

    Addict Dis

    (1974)
  • L Dahlgren et al.

    Are special treatment facilities for female alcoholics needed? A controlled 2-year follow-up study from a specialised female unit (EWA) versus a mixed male/female treatment facility

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (1989)
  • J DeHaes et al.

    Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptoms Checklist

    Br J Cancer

    (1990)
  • C Drummond

    The relationship between alcohol dependence and alcohol-related problems in a clinical population

    Br J Addict

    (1990)
  • R Ferrence

    Sex differences in the prevalence of problem drinking

  • K Fillmore

    Women's drinking across the adult life course as compared to men's

    Br J Addict

    (1987)
  • K Fillmore et al.

    Gender differences for the risk of alcohol-related problems in multiple national contexts

    Recent Dev Alcohol: Women Alcohol

    (1995)
  • J.H Foster et al.

    Quality of life measures in alcohol dependent subjects and changes with abstinence and continued heavy drinking

    Addict Biol

    (1998)
  • J.H Foster et al.

    Predictors of relapse to heavy drinking in alcohol dependent subjects following alcohol detoxification. The role of quality of life measures, ethnicity, social class, cigarette and drug use

    Addict Biol

    (1998)
  • J Foster et al.

    Quality of life in alcohol dependent subjects: a review

    Qual Life Res

    (1999)
  • D Goldberg

    The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire (Maudsley Monograph No. 2)

    (1972)
  • E Gomberg

    Women and alcohol: use and abuse

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (1993)
  • K Graham et al.

    Should alcohol consumption measures be adjusted for gender differences?

    Addiction

    (1998)
  • Cited by (94)

    • Addiction: Sex and gender evidence in alcohol, tobacco use and nicotine addiction, and opioid use disorders

      2020, How Sex and Gender Impact Clinical Practice: an Evidence-Based Guide to Patient Care
    • Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: Contemporary knowledge and future research considerations

      2015, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Yet, they are less likely than men to receive alcohol-related services in their lifetime (Alvanzo et al., 2014; Greenfield, 2002; Greenfield et al., 2010), and also more likely to use non-alcohol-specific health care settings (Greenfield, 2002; Weisner and Schmidt, 1992). The length of time until return to drinking is similar for men and women (Foster et al., 2000; Greenfield et al., 2000); however it takes longer time to return to heavy drinking for women (Saunders et al., 1993). Post-treatment relapse in women is also more likely to be related to negative affect, while men are more likely to relapse in the context of social pressure (Annis et al., 1998; Zywiak et al., 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text