Analyzing Qualitative Interview Data: The Discourse Analytic Method
Section snippets
Context-dependent variation in interview talk
The constructivist method of interpretation used in discourse analysis problematizes some traditional approaches in qualitative analysis. Interview talk is approached with very different expectations from how we have learned, as members of culture, to interpret people's talk in everyday life. Participants' accounts, or verbal expressions, are not treated as descriptions of actual processes, behavior, or mental events. Interview talk is by nature a cultural and collective phenomenon. The meaning
Participants' interpretation work
The kind of variation and inconsistency seen in the extracts is not an exception, nor is it a product of the interview situation (for similar examples, see Gilbert & Mulkay 1984, Machin & Carrithers 1996, Potter & Mulkay 1985, Potter & Wetherell 1987). Inconsistencies can also easily be found in the answers to survey questionnaires. However, such variation is usually managed by analytic strategies of restriction, for instance categorization, coding, and selective reading, because researchers
The identification of interpretative repertoires
The analysis of interpretative repertoires is like putting together a jigsaw puzzle. Interviews are not interpreted as stories having a clear and distinguishable message and meaning; instead, all the accounts produced by the participants are taken into consideration and analyzed to identify significant patterns of consistency and variation in them. Thereafter, the researcher starts to ask: What is the starting point behind this account? On what kinds of limitations of perspective is this
Statements and absences
According to Foucault (1972), each discourse is based on a few background assumptions that he calls statements. Statements are unspoken theories about the nature of things, and they are the necessary and implicit starting points behind a particular way of speaking about a topic. On the basis of the statements, a particular state of things is assumed (e.g., “if we gave up investing in education, the consequences would be serious”). The statements building a discourse provide a particular angle
Interviews as social texts
Discourse analysts are not interested in processes taking place either in individuals' minds or in reality. They concentrate on the regularities of language use: what kinds of descriptions and accounts of a topic are possible, what kinds of evaluations are they based on, how do different modes of accounting construct different versions of the topic or produce different kinds of truths, and what do these versions accomplish (Wetherell & Potter, 1988). It is seen that discourses are “historical
Validity and reliability in discourse analytic research
Alasuutari (1995) distinguishes between two different approaches in the analysis of qualitative interview data, the factist and specimen perspectives. In the factist approach, researchers want to find out about the actual behavior or attitudes of the participants. The analysis concentrates on the contents of interview answers, which reveal something about phenomena or processes occurring either in participants' inner realities or in external reality. These phenomena or processes are the true
Discourse analysis as a research method in lis
This article has described a method of analyzing qualitative interview data in which the basic analytic unit is an interpretative repertoire and which systematizes the discourses existing in a particular field or institutional context. Discourse analysis differs significantly from the hermeneutic and factist methods of reading qualitative interview data because it is, in a way, indifferent toward individual speakers' intentions. However, the hermeneutic research approach that aims at capturing
References (45)
- et al.
Discourse analysisMethod and application in the study of information
Information Processing & Management
(1996) Discourse analysis as a research method in library and information science
Library & Information Science Research
(1994)The feminist and the emperor's new clothesFeminist deconstruction as a critical methodology for library and information studies
Library & Information Science Research
(1997)Conversation in information-seeking contextsA test of an analytic framework
Library & Information Science Research
(1997)Researching cultureQualitative method and cultural studies
(1995)The dialogical imagination
(1981)Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics
(1984)- et al.
Ideological dilemmasA social psychology of everyday thinking
(1988) - et al.
Reframing the paradigm debate
Library Quarterly
(1993) - et al.
PhenomenographyOpening a new territory for LIS research
New Review of Library and Information Science Research
(1998)
The cultural state of the Fin de Millenaire library
Library Quarterly
The “overdue kid”A face-to-face library service encounter as ritual interaction
Library & Information Science Research 19
Information needs and uses
The archaeology of knowledge
Power/knowledgeSelected interviews and other writings 1972–77
The history of sexualityAn introduction
Knowledge and power in library and information serviceToward a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint
“Best books” and excited readersDiscursive tensions in the writings of Melvil Dewey
Libraries & Culture
Opening Pandora's box. A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse
The rediscovery of “ideology”Return of the repressed in media studies
The West and the restDiscourse and power
From “interpretative communities” to “communities of improvisation.”
Media
Cited by (159)
Changing understandings of waste reduction and avoidance in moralities of thrift: A comparison of Mass Observers’ narratives three decades apart
2022, GeoforumCitation Excerpt :Correspondents inevitably draw upon collectively shared codes, frames, vocabularies and classifications within an intersubjective cultural system, to communicate their personal experiences and to express their personal attitudes. To enable the identification and analysis of these collectively shared codes, frames, vocabularies and classifications, a discourse analytical approach was applied, with coding conducted on respondents’ lines of reasoning, rather than around thematic categories (Ehgartner, 2021; Potter and Wetherell, 1987; Talja, 1999). Applying this methodological lens, understandings of waste reduction and avoidance were empirically observed in the context of writings about ‘thrift’.
Nonphysical Suffering: An Under-Resourced and Key Role for Hospice and Palliative Care Social Workers
2024, Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life and Palliative CareCooling down the future: A discourse analysis of climate change skepticism
2024, Social Science JournalChallenges for Gambian primary schools aiming to enhance literacy through the use of national languages
2023, Multilingual Learning: Assessment, Ideologies and Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa