Choices and motivations of infertile couples

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01010-0Get rights and content

Abstract

When couples are confronted with infertility they may choose among several options: medical help, adoption, fostering, alternative medicine and focusing on other life goals. The frequency of choices and motivations for these options were investigated among 131 infertile couples. Husbands and wives answered a structured questionnaire. The medical option was chosen in more than 80% of the cases. Also, this choice is made very quickly. Other options were considered at a later time, and chosen much later than the medical option. The most frequently mentioned motive for seeking help is the desire to have a child. This motive is reported in all forms of help seeking. Motives for medical consultation are often seeking information, understanding the cause of infertility and physical complaints. Altruistic motives are rather important when considering adoption, and very important when considering foster-care.

Introduction

Infertility is usually defined as having no pregnancy after a year of unprotected regular intercourse 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. This definition is also used by the WHO [6]. In Western societies, around 15% of couples experience infertility problems regarding the first child (primary infertility) 1, 2, 7, 8. When couples realize that they have an infertility problem they may choose among several options. However, the decisions regarding these choices are not always made in a rational way. Decision making concerning infertility can better be described as a continuous and complex process, in which different options arise at different times, depending on the stage in the infertility process. Also infertile couples can choose more than one option, either in succession or even at the same time 9, 10.

It is supposed that the most common option is to seek medical help. An alternative like adopting a child is often considered as a `second best' choice 10, 11. Just a few studies have addressed the question regarding the proportion of infertile couples who seek medical help. Templeton et al. reported that, in the U.K., between 72 and 95% of the primary infertile couples seek medical help 12, 13. In a recent Finnish study it was concluded that 67% of primary and secondary infertile couples in Finland seek medical help [14]. However, Hirsch and Mosher found that, in the US, 50% or more of the couples do not receive medical help for primary infertility [15]. The same figure was found in 1979 in Denmark [16], for couples who were infertile for 2 years.

Most studies dealing with the way in which couples cope with infertility are limited to samples of couples seeking medical help 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26. However, there are several other options: adoption, fostering, seeking alternative medicine and choosing other life goals.

The main topic of this paper is the analysis of arguments in favour and arguments against these options. It was investigated whether different options are associated with different motivations. Especially, we were interested in the impact of altruistic motives in choosing for adoption or foster-care. Furthermore, we wanted to find out whether the frequency of counter-arguments varied among the different options. A better understanding of the various choices and the motivations for these choices can help medical and non-medical staff in counseling infertile couples.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

In 1992 a national survey was held among 8050 Dutch households, randomly selected from all areas in the Netherlands. An interviewer visited the selected households with a questionnaire. In this questionnaire, three questions were included about infertility. The questions asked referred to their age, whether they had ever tried to get pregnant, and how long it took to become pregnant with their first child. Infertility was defined as 1 year of unprotected regular intercourse without getting

Frequency of deliberation and choice of options

The most frequently deliberated option was seeking medical help: 95%. Almost all couples who considered medical help, chose this option. Medical help was chosen by 86% of the couples. Eighty-one percent of the couples consulted a general practitioner, and 74% consulted a gynaecologist. Far less couples considered the other options. The most frequently deliberated alternatives were adoption and other life goals (both in 35% of cases). Fostering and alternative medicine were considered by less

Conclusion

Couples confronted with infertility mostly have to face a complicated decision making process involving several options for a successful resolution of this life crisis. In this study we investigated the motives for and against these options. The sample was defined according to the usual definition of infertility: 1 year of unprotected regular intercourse without pregnancy. However, the infertile period may vary strongly: some couples have a very short experience of infertility, other couples

References (28)

  • Greenhall E, Vessey M. The prevalence of subfertility: a review of the current confusion and a report of two new...
  • Thonneau P, Spira A. Prevalence of infertility: international data and problems of measurement. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol...
  • Abbey A, Andrews FM, Halman LJ. Gender's role in response to infertility. Psychol Women Q 1991: 15:...
  • Sundby J. Infertility, causes, care and consequences. Oslo: National Institute of Public Health,...
  • Schmidt L, Münster K. Infertility, involuntary infecundity, and the seeking of medical advice in industrialized...
  • Rowe PJ, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ, Comhaire FH. WHO manual for the standardized investigations and diagnosis of the...
  • Hull MGR, Glazener CMA, Kelly NJ, Conway DI, Foster PA, Hinton RA, Coulson C, Lambert PA, Watt EM, Desai KM. Population...
  • Van Balen F, Verdurmen JEE, Ketting E. Leeftijd, kinderwens en zwangerschapskans in Nederland (Age, desire to have a...
  • Van Balen F, Trimbos-Kemper GCM. Strategies after discovering infertility. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 13:...
  • Sandelowski M, Harris BG, Holditch-Davis D. Mazing: Infertile couples and the quest for a child. Image J Nurs Scholar...
  • Miall CE. The stigma of adoptive parent status: perceptions of community attitudes toward adoption and the experience...
  • Templeton A, Fraser C, Thompson B. The epidemiology of infertility in Aberdeen. Br Med J 1990; 301:...
  • Templeton A, Fraser C, Thompson B. Infertility-epidemiology and referral practice. Hum Reprod 1990; 6:...
  • Silverio MM, Hemminki E. Practice of in-vitro fertilization: a case study from Finland. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42:...
  • Cited by (73)

    • Factors associated with medical help-seeking for infertility in developed countries: A narrative review of recent literature

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Few studies have examined whether psychological characteristics are associated with medical help-seeking. A sizeable portion of a sample of infertile women who were asked to list reasons for and against medical treatment mention anxiety about medical treatment as a reason for not pursuing treatment (Van Balen and Verdurmen, 1999; Van Balen, Verdurmen and Ketting, 1997). Two analyses using the pilot study of the NSFB reported that higher internal health locus of control was associated with lower odds of medical help-seeking (Greil and McQuillan, 2004; White et al., 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text