Elsevier

Journal of Pragmatics

Volume 31, Issue 7, July 1999, Pages 919-929
Journal of Pragmatics

Article
On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Instead of postulating the priority of literal meaning (see e.g., Grice, 1975; Searle, 1979), the present paper adduces evidence in support of the priority of salient meanings (for a similar view see Récanati, 1995). The salient meaning of a word or an expression is its lexicalized meaning, i.e., the meaning retrievable from the mental lexicon rather than from the context (e.g., the literal meaning of novel metaphors but not their intended, nonliteral meaning made available by context, see Giora, 1997). Factors contributing to (degrees of) lexical salience are e.g., conventionality, frequency, and familiarity. Research into the processes involved in comprehension of familiar and novel instances of metaphors, idioms, and irony demonstrates that salient meanings enjoy a privileged status: They are always accessed, and always initially, regardless of context. The findings reported here tie up with previous findings (e.g., Swinney, 1979; Gernsbacher, 1990; Rayner et al., 1994) which argue against the selective access view of context. They show that, contrary to the received view (see Gibbs, 1994, for a review), even rich and supportive contexts which are biased in favor of less salient meanings do not inhibit activation of salient meanings.

References (47)

  • Keith Rayner et al.

    Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1994)
  • François Récanati

    The alleged priority of literal meaning

    Cognitive Science

    (1995)
  • David A. Swinney

    Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1979)
  • Eran Zaidel

    Performance on the ITPA following cerebral commissurotomy and hemispherectomy

    Neuropsychologia

    (1979)
  • M.Amy Bihrle et al.

    Comprehension of humorous and non-humorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients

    Brain and Cognition

    (1986)
  • G.Dawn Blasko et al.

    Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1993)
  • Jerry Fodor

    The modularity of mind

    (1983)
  • Howard Gardner et al.

    The right hemispheric communication battery

    (1986)
  • Morton Ann Gernsbacher

    Language comprehension as structure building

    (1990)
  • Morton Ann Gernsbacher et al.

    Reading skill and suppression revisited

    Psychological Science

    (1995)
  • Raymond W. Gibbs

    Spilling the bean on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation

    Memory and Cognition

    (1980)
  • Raymond W. Gibbs

    A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourse

    Text

    (1982)
  • Cited by (228)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Support for this research was provided by grants from The Israel Science Foundation and Lion Foundation. I would also like to thank Mira Ariel and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful remarks.

    View full text