Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 22, Issue 4, July–August 1997, Pages 469-477
Addictive Behaviors

Measuring excessive alcohol use in college drinking contexts: The drinking context scale

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(96)00050-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Research on youthful drinking has shown that the greatest risks associated with alcohol abuse are related to contextual factors that may potentiate heavy drinking as well as increase risks for adverse consequences. These contextual factors include interacting psychological, interpersonal, and environmental dimensions of alcohol use. However, despite considerable college drinking research to identify these factors, few formal instruments have been produced for measuring excessive drinking in multidimensional contexts. The current study of 197 college students who were cited their first time for breaking university drinking rules focuses on the development and validation of a scale for measuring the likelihood of excessive drinking across an array of psychological, interpersonal and situational contexts resulting in the 23-item Drinking Context Scale (DCS). Three distinct factors emerged defining Convivial drinking. Private Intimate drinking, and drinking as a form of Negative Coping. These three factors explained 61.5% of the variance after principal components analysis and varimax rotation, showed excellent internal reliabilities, and were moderately intercorrelated. MANOVA analysis demonstrated concurrent validity with the Quality Frequency Index (QFI) and a modified version of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST). Implications for further research with the DCS are suggested.

References (35)

  • K.B. Carey

    Heavy drinking contexts and indices of problem drinking among college students

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (1995)
  • L.C. Collins et al.

    Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1985)
  • A.L. Comrey

    Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1988)
  • B. Critchlow

    The powers of John Barleycorn

    American Psychologist

    (1986)
  • R.C. Engs

    Drinking patterns and drinking problems of college students

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (1977)
  • K.M. Fillmore

    Drinking and problem drinking in early adulthood and middle age: An exploratory 20-year follow-up study

    Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (1974)
  • T. Harford et al.

    Psychosocial factors in adolescent drinking contexts

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (1987)
  • Cited by (70)

    • What you think and where you drink: Context, alcohol outcome expectancies, and drinking behavior

      2019, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      0 = Not at All/Never Drank; 5 = Seven or More Drinks) to assess context-specific drinking quantity and frequency, respectively. Drawing from O'Hare's (1997) DCS, convivial context items were “At a party or when others around you are partying,” “When you're celebrating something important to you,” and “When you're with close friends/few friends.” Negative-coping context items consisted of “After a fight with someone close to you,” “When feeling lonely, homesick, sad, discouraged, or depressed,” and “When you're angry with yourself or someone else.”

    • A pilot test of a motivational interviewing social network intervention to reduce substance use among housing first residents

      2018, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Quantity of alcohol use was assessed with a Quantity Frequency Index (QFI) constructed from responses to two questions: 1) number of days (0–28) of any alcohol use and 2) the number of drinks typically consumed per drinking day. QFIs have a history of reliability and validity across various populations (O'Hare, 1997) and capture independent dimensions of AOD use behavior (Vamos et al., 2013). To calculate the QFI, we multiplied the response to the quantity of alcohol use question by the response to the typical frequency question to calculate a total number of drinks in the past 4 weeks.

    • Social anxiety and heavy situational drinking: Coping and conformity motives as multiple mediators

      2015, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Internal consistency of the DMQR subscales was adequate in our sample: social (α = .93), coping (α = .87), enhancement (α = .90), conformity (α = .88). A revised version of the Drinking Context Scale (DCS; O'Hare, 1997) assessed participant typical drinking quantity across eleven social situations (e.g., at a party, after school/work), nine interpersonal circumstances (e.g., on a date, with a close friend), and six negative emotional situations (e.g., when angry at others, after a fight). To assess situational drinking quantity, DCS items were measured using the DDQ scale (i.e., 0 to 30 or more drinks).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text