Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 57, Issue 5, September 2003, Pages 881-893
Social Science & Medicine

Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00456-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Why is the broad American public disapproving of urban African American teen mothers and unaware that the scientific evidence on the consequences of teen childbearing, per se, is equivocal? I focus on the links between culture, identity, and privilege. I argue that the broader society is selective in its attention to the actual life chances of urban African Americans and how these chances shape fertility-timing norms, in part, because this selective focus helps maintain the core values, competencies, and privileges of the dominant group. Delayed childbearing is an adaptive practice for European Americans and an intensely salient goal they have for their children. Yet early fertility-timing patterns may constitute adaptive practice for African American residents of high-poverty urban areas, in no small measure because they contend with structural constraints that shorten healthy life expectancy. European Americans put their cultural priorities into action ahead of the needs of African Americans and employ substantial resources to disseminate the social control message meant for their youth that teenage childbearing has disastrous consequences. Their ability to develop a more nuanced understanding of early childbearing is limited by their culturally mediated perceptions. Thus, cultural dominance can be perpetuated by well-meaning people consciously dedicated to children's well-being, social justice, and the public good. The entrenched cultural interdependence of and social inequality between European and African Americans leads African Americans to be highly visible targets of moral condemnation for their fertility behavior, and also sets up African Americans to pay a particularly high political, economic, psychosocial, and health price.

Section snippets

The consequences of Teen Childbearing

The concept of teenage childbearing as a social problem is relatively new, dating back roughly to the 1970s (see Nathanson, 1991; Luker, 1996 for historical and political analyses of the emergence of this social construction). Although studies in the 1970s and 1980s documented an association between teenage childbearing and poor outcomes for teen mothers (occasionally fathers), their offspring, and society at large, from a methodological stand point the conclusion that teenage childbearing

Fertility-timing norms and distributions

One way to understand population differences in fertility timing distributions is to consider them as reflecting collectively patterned “fertility timing norms”, which are adaptive cultural or population practices. Fertility-timing norms are critical mechanisms through which the basic cultural imperatives toward economic and reproductive success are pursued; at their best, fertility-timing norms are well calibrated to support and draw support from local family economies and caretaking systems.

White elders, black teens: In loco parentis or la vida loca?

But what motivates dominant group elders to condemn or try to change the fertility timing norms of African American residents of high-poverty urban areas? Clearly, the notion that the ages seen as appropriate for childbearing can vary across generations and cultural groups is not beyond our grasp. Many of our grandmothers became mothers as teenagers. Why is the broader public so disapproving of current African American teen mothers?

As noted, the most common justifications are open to question

Social inequality, social control, and social identity: The costs to African Americans

A key reason, then, that dominant group elders are unable to view early fertility timing norms in high poverty, African American communities with equanimity may be the following: cultural variation in family ideals is a relatively straightforward and tolerable concept when the varying cultures are politically, economically, and socially distinct from one another. Accepting cultural relativity in deeply cherished, fundamental family ideals becomes more difficult, complicated, and threatening,

Conclusion

The well-being of children and families, and, by extension, the vitality of communities and their economic and reproductive success, is likely to be enhanced when the adults charged with the primary care of children have reliable social resources outside themselves. The illusion that US parents in socio-economically advantaged nuclear families raise their children independently is an artifact of the availability of a range of social resources that supplant the need to depend on relatives,

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges financial support for this work from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through an Investigator in Health Policy Research Award. I am also indebted to Robert A. Levine for his instruction, to Sherman James, Jay Pearson, John Bound and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, to Cindy Colen for research assistance, and to N.E. Barr for editorial assistance. The views expressed are my own.

References (79)

  • E. Cose

    The rage of a privileged class

    (1993)
  • T. DeLeire et al.

    Good things come in threesSingle-parent multi-generational family structure and adolescent adjustment

    Demography

    (2002)
  • W.W. Dressler

    Modeling biocultural interactionsExamples from studies of stress and cardiovascular disease

    Yearbook of Physical Anthropology

    (1995)
  • W.W. Dressler

    Modernization, stress, and blood pressureNew directions in research

    Human Biology

    (1999)
  • DuBois, W. E. B. (1903) (1961). The souls of Black folk. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett...
  • F. Furstenberg et al.

    Adolescent mothers and their children in later life

    Family Planning Perspectives

    (1987)
  • C. Geertz

    Local knowledgeFurther essays in interpretive anthropology

    (1983)
  • A.T. Geronimus

    On teenage childbearing and neonatal mortality in the United States

    Population and Developmental Review

    (1987)
  • A.T. Geronimus

    Teenage childbearing and social and reproductive disadvantageThe evolution of complex questions and the demise of simple answers

    Family Relations

    (1991)
  • A.T. Geronimus

    Clashes of common senseOn the previous childcare experience of teenage mothers-to-be

    Human Organization

    (1992)
  • Geronimus, A. T. (1994). The health of African American women and infants: Implications for reproductive strategies and...
  • A.T. Geronimus

    What teen mothers know

    Human Nature

    (1996)
  • A.T. Geronimus

    Teenage childbearing and personal responsibilityAn alternative view

    Political Science Quarterly

    (1997)
  • A.T. Geronimus

    To mitigate, resist, or undoAddressing structural influences on the health of urban populations

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2000)
  • A.T. Geronimus

    Understanding and eliminating racial inequalities in women's health in the United StatesThe role of the weathering conceptual framework

    Journal of the American Medical Women's Association

    (2001)
  • A.T. Geronimus et al.

    The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered

    Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (1992)
  • A.T. Geronimus et al.

    Maternal youth or family background? On the health disadvantages of infants with teenage mothers

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1993)
  • A.T. Geronimus et al.

    Does young maternal age adversely affect child development? Evidence from cousin comparisons

    Population and Development Review

    (1994)
  • A.T. Geronimus et al.

    Inequality in life expectancy, functional status, and active life expectancy across selected black and white populations in the United States

    Demography

    (2001)
  • E. Goffman

    Stigmanotes on the management of spoiled identity

    (1963)
  • F.D. Ginsburg et al.

    Conceiving the new world order

    (1995)
  • J.B. Hardy et al.

    Long-range outcome of adolescent pregnancy

    Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1978)
  • Hayes, C. D.(Ed.). (1987). Risking the future: Adolescent sexuality, pregnancy, and childbearing, vol 1. Washington,...
  • B. hooks

    Killing rageending racism

    (1995)
  • V.J Hotz et al.

    The costs and consequences of teenage childbearing for mothers

    Chicago Policy Review, Fall

    (1996)
  • V.J. Hotz et al.

    Bounding causal effects using data from a contaminated natural experimentAnalysing the effects of teenage childbearing

    Review of Economic Studies

    (1997)
  • Hubbard, R. (1983). Have only men evolved? In S. Harding, & M. Hintikka (Eds.). Discovering reality: Feminist...
  • S.A. James

    John Henryism and the health of African–Americans

    Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • Jordan, B. (1997). Authorititative knowledge and its construction. In R. E. Davis-Floyd, & C. F. Sargent (Eds.)....
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text