Article
Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Different conceptual perspectives converge to predict that if individuals are stressed, an encounter with most unthreatening natural environments will have a stress reducing or restorative influence, whereas many urban environments will hamper recuperation. Hypotheses regarding emotional, attentional and physiological aspects of stress reducing influences of nature are derived from a psycho-evolutionary theory. To investigate these hypotheses, 120 subjects first viewed a stressful movie, and then were exposed to color/sound videotapes of one of six different natural and urban settings. Data concerning stress recovery during the environmental presentations were obtained from self-ratings of affective states and a battery of physiological measures: heart period, muscle tension, skin conductance and pulse transit time, a non-invasive measure that correlates with systolic blood pressure. Findings from the physiological and verbal measures converged to indicate that recovery was faster and more complete when subjects were exposed to natural rather than urban environments. The pattern of physiological findings raised the possibility that responses to nature had a salient parasympathetic nervous system component; however, there was no evidence of pronounced parasympathetic involvement in responses to the urban settings. There were directional differences in cardiac responses to the natural vs urban settings, suggesting that attention/intake was higher during the natural exposures. However, both the stressor film and the nature settings elicited high levels of involuntary or automatic attention, which contradicts the notion that restorative influences of nature stem from involuntary attention or fascination. Findings were consistent with the predictions of the psycho-evolutionary theory that restorative influences of nature involve a shift towards a more positively-toned emotional state, positive changes in physiological activity levels, and that these changes are accompanied by sustained attention/intake. Content differences in terms of natural vs human-made properties appeared decisive in accounting for the differences in recuperation and perceptual intake.

References (75)

  • BernaldezF.G. et al.

    Dimensions of landscape preferences from pairwise comparisons

  • CermakG.W. et al.

    Multidimensional analyses of judgments about traffic noise

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1976)
  • CohenS.

    Environmental load and the allocation of attention

  • CohenS. et al.

    Behavior, Health, and Environmental Stress

    (1986)
  • DimbergU.

    Facial electromyography and emotional reactions

    Psychophysiology

    (1990)
  • DimbergU. et al.

    Facial electromyography, fear relevance, and the experience of stimuli

    Journal of Psychophysiology

    (1988)
  • DriverB.L.

    Quantification of outdoor recreationists' preferences

  • DriverB.L. et al.

    Man's nature: innate determinants of response to natural environments

  • DriverB.L. et al.

    Temporary escape: one product of sport fisheries management

    Fisheries

    (1975)
  • EvansG.W. et al.

    Environmental stress

  • EvansG.W. et al.

    Stress and properties of the physical environment

  • FrankenhaeuserM.

    Psychoneuroendocrine approaches to the study of stressful person-environment transactions

  • GlackenC.J.

    Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought From Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century

    (1967)
  • GlassD.C. et al.

    Urban Stress: Experiments On Noise and Social Stressors

    (1972)
  • HartigT. et al.

    Perspectives on wilderness: testing the theory of restorative environments

  • HareR.D. et al.

    Autonomic responses to affective visual stimulation

    Psychophysiology

    (1970)
  • HeerwagenJ.H.

    Psychological aspects of windows and window design

  • HoldingD.H.

    Fatigue

  • HoneymanM.

    Vegetation and stress: a comparison study of varying amounts of vegetation in countryside and urban scenes

  • HullR.B.

    Mood as a product of leisure: causes and consequences

    Journal of Leisure Research

    (1990)
  • KaplanR. et al.

    The Experience of Nature

    (1989)
  • KaplanS. et al.

    Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience

  • KaplanS. et al.

    Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1972)
  • KatcherA.H. et al.

    Looking, talking, and blood pressure: the physiological consequences of interaction with the living environment

  • KatcherA. et al.

    Comparison of contemplation and hypnosis for the reduction of anxiety and discomfort during dental surgery

    American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

    (1984)
  • KennedyS. et al.

    Psychoneuroimmunology

  • Cited by (3277)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant SES-8317803. Portions of the physiological findings were presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, Atlanta, Georgia, April, 1986 (Ulrich & Simons, 1986).

    View full text