Preschoolers' Suggestibility: Effects of Developmentally Appropriate Language and Interviewer Supportiveness
Section snippets
Interviewer Supportiveness
Interviewers' attempts to create child-friendly situations have been shown to influence young children's resistance to suggestion, as will be examined below. Unfortunately, as Goodman, Rudy, Bottoms, and Aman (1990) pointed out, in actual cases of abuse, interviewers who build rapport with children may be criticized. The critics of rapport-building suggest that this supportiveness may encourage inaccuracies by reinforcing false statements. In contrast, the limited extant data suggest that
Appropriate Language
Another possible way to insure that children are responding at an optimal level is by incorporating an appropriate level of language into the interview. When questioning a child, it is often difficult to know if the child understands the question, and so it is hard to determine what the child is able to report from the relevant incident. This difficulty is compounded by young children's failure to request clarification if they do not understand what they have been asked (Flavell, Speer, Green,
Additional Factors Related to Accuracy of Responses
Researchers have suggested that a child's temperament will affect her reporting of an event in a variety of ways. For example, Merritt, Ornstein, and Spicker (1994) interviewed 3- to 7-year olds after an invasive medical procedure. They found that two dimensions of temperament as described by the Temperament Assessment Battery for Children (TABC) (Martin, 1988), adaptability and approach or withdrawal, were positively and very strongly correlated with recall at both the initial interview and at
Rationale for the Present Investigation
This investigation was designed to contribute to the understanding of suggestibility in preschool-age children by examining the effects of interviewer style and complexity of language. Children participated in an experimenter-provided activity so that details of their experience could be verified. Because of the limited extent to which children as young as 3 provide information in response to open-ended questions and the concerns that arise from the resulting need to rely on yes or no probes
Participants
Participants were 64 children attending one of seven classes for preschoolers in daycare classes in suburban communities near Raleigh, North Carolina. The daycare centers served primarily middle- to upper-middle–income families. The participants' mean age was 48.41 months (SD = 4.19), and the sample included 35 females and 29 males. Children were recruited from classes for 3-year olds in late spring; consequently, many participants would soon join a 4-year-old class. Reflecting the racial
Results
Correct responses to direct questions were defined in terms of correct responses to the questions addressing features that actually transpired during the volcano event. Suggestibility was operationalized as the child's failure to reject misleading questions. (See Appendix B for a listing of these questions.) Each correct rejection reflected the child's disagreement with the interviewer's implication about an absent event. Because interviewers on occasion omitted questions, both responses to
Discussion
This investigation examines young children's accuracy of responses to direct questions and suggestibility when differing interview protocols are used. Specifically, language appropriateness and supportive interviewer behaviors were hypothesized to increase accuracy of responses to direct questions and resistance to suggestibility. From the present results, it appears that to optimize young children's accuracy in reporting their personal experiences, it is important to tailor the interview
Acknowledgements
Partial support for this research was received through HD 32214 from the United States Public Health Service. Thanks to Adrienne Murrell, Alicia Parr, Alan Behrman, Kelly Ratliff, Alex Ward, the cooperating child care centers and personnel, and the participating parents and children. The advice of an anonymous reviewer is also appreciated. Portions of this work were presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC, April 1997.
References (41)
The relationship of intellectual skills to suggestibility, compliance and acquiescence
Personality and Individual Differences
(1990)The effects of intelligence and memory on group differences in suggestibility and compliance
Personality and Individual Differences
(1991)- et al.
Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse
Child Abuse and Neglect
(1997) - et al.
Young children's long-term retention of a pediatric examination
Child Development
(1993) - et al.
How shall a thing be coded? Implications of the use of alternative procedures for scoring children's verbal reports
- et al.
An introduction to the Cognitive Interview technique
- et al.
Strange languageChild victims under cross-examination
(1988) A first languageThe early stages
(1973)- et al.
Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports
Law and Human Behavior
(1996) Cognitive and social factors in children's testimony
Suggestibility of the child witnessA historical review and synthesis
Psychological Bulletin
The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool children
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Current trends in child abuse reporting and fatalitiesThe results of the 1989 annual 50 states survey
Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewingThe Cognitive Interview
Improving eyewitness testimony with the cognitive interview
Effects of cognitive questioning techniques on children's recall performance
Children's testimony about a stressful eventImproving children's reports
Journal of Narrative and Life History
Children's concerns and memoryIssues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony
Does the use of dolls facilitate children's memory of visits to the doctor?
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Cited by (84)
Attentional difficulty is a risk factor for interrogative suggestibility in preschoolers
2020, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :Several temperament traits have been studied in child suggestibility research. These include shyness (Chae & Ceci, 2005; Endres, Poggenpohl, & Erben, 1999; Pozzulo, Coplan, & Wilson, 2005; Roebers & Schneider, 2001; Shapiro & Purdy, 2005; Shapiro, Blackford, & Chen, 2005; Young, Powell, & Dudgeon, 2003), emotionality (Burgwyn-Bailes, Baker-Ward, Gordon, & Ornstein, 2001; Chae & Ceci, 2005; Geddie, Fradin, & Beer, 2000; Gordon et al., 1993; Imhoff & Baker-Ward, 1999; Raju et al., 1999), activity (Shapiro & Purdy, 2005; Shapiro et al., 2005), approach-withdrawal (Burgwyn-Bailes et al., 2001; Gordon et al., 1993; Imhoff & Baker-Ward, 1999; Shapiro et al., 2005), and distractibility (Alexander et al., 2002; Burgwyn-Bailes et al., 2001; Geddie et al., 2000; Gordon et al., 1993; Greenhoot, Ornstein, Gordon, & Baker-Ward, 1999; Imhoff & Baker-Ward, 1999; Shapiro et al., 2005; Shapiro & Purdy, 2005). The findings of these studies have been mixed, but most have failed to find significant associations between suggestibility and dimensions of temperament (for a review, see Klemfuss & Olaguez, 2018).
Emotions and Cognition in International Criminal Justice: An Exploration from Cognitive Biases to Emotional Intelligence
2020, Forensic Science International: Mind and LawImpact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure
2015, Child Abuse and NeglectCitation Excerpt :Hence, supportive interviewers may encourage children to disclose SA in formal investigations (Elliott & Briere, 1994; Lawson & Chaffin, 1992). In contrast, Imhoff and Baker-Ward (1999) did not find any benefit when supportive behaviors were used compared to neutral interviewing styles. They argued that most benefits of support are detected when compared to non-supportive behaviors (intimidating, confrontational and dominant).
Are Children Reliable Witnesses?
2022, Are Children Reliable Witnesses?