The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale revisited: More perfect with four (instead of six) dimensions

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00207-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS; Frost, Marten, Lahart & Rosenblate, 1990) provides six subscales for a multidimensional assessment of perfectionism: Concern over Mistakes (CM), Personal Standards (PS), Parental Expectations (PE), Parental Criticism (PC), Doubts about actions (D), and Organization (O). Despite its increasing popularity in personality and clinical research, the FMPS has also drawn some criticism for its factorial instability across samples. The present article argues that this instability may be due to an overextraction of components. Whereas all previous analyses presented six-factor solutions for the FMPS items, a reanalysis with Horn's parallel analysis suggested only four or five underlying factors. To investigate the nature of these factors, item responses from N = 243 participants were subjected to principal component analysis. Again, parallel analysis retained only four components. Varimax rotation replicated PS and O as separate factors, whereas combining CM with D as well as PE with PC. Consequently, the present article suggests a reduction to four (instead of six) FMPS subscales. Differential correlations with anxiety, depression, parental representations and action tendencies underscore the advantage of this solution.

References (45)

  • A.M. Bastiani et al.

    Perfectionism in anorexia nervosa

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (1995)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • D.D. Burns

    The perfectionist's script for self-defeat

    Psychology Today

    (1980)
  • E.G. Carmines et al.

    Reliability and validity assessment

    (1979)
  • A.A. Cota et al.

    Comparing different methods for implementing parallel analysis: A practical index of accuracy

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (1993)
  • G.L. Flett et al.

    Dimensions of perfectionism and goal commitment: A further comparison of two perfectionism measures

    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

    (1995)
  • M. Frese et al.

    Goal orientation and planfulness: Action styles as personality concepts

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • R.O. Frost et al.

    Perfectionism and reactions to athletic competition

    Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

    (1991)
  • R.O. Frost et al.

    The development of perfectionism: A study of daughters and their parents

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (1991)
  • R.O. Frost et al.

    Perfectionism and evaluative threat

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (1990)
  • R.O. Frost et al.

    The dimensions of perfectionism

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (1990)
  • R.O. Frost et al.

    Reactions to mistakes among subjects high and low in perfectionistic concern over mistakes

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (1995)
  • Cited by (212)

    • The global assessment of OCD

      2022, Comprehensive Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In light of the above, it is important to screen and assess for OCPD. The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale [312] can be used to screen for perfectionism; however, a diagnosis can be made with the aid of the Structured Clinical Interview for personality disorders (SCID-5-PD) [313]. Comorbidity with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorders (EUPD) has been reported as 5% [314].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address: Ernst-Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Department of Psychology, Franz-Mehring-Str. 47, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.

    View full text