Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 35, Issue 3, March 2002, Pages 221-229
Lung Cancer

Original article
Genetic determinants of lung cancer short-term survival: the role of glutathione-related genes

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00426-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: Survival of lung cancer patients has been dismal. Glutathione enzymes are directly involved in the metabolism of platinum compounds, a group of important chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer treatment. We tested the hypothesis that genes encoding glutathione enzymes may predict lung cancer short-term survival. Methods: We studied DNA polymorphisms of 250 primary lung cancer patients at four glutathione-related loci: GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and γ-GCS that encode glutathione-S-transferase-π, glutathione-S-transferase-μ, glutathione-S-transferase-θ, and γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, respectively. Pearson's χ2-square tests, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log rank tests, and Cox regression models were applied in the analysis. Results: There were 150 (60%) men and 100 (40%) women in this study. Seventeen percent of the patients had never smoked cigarettes, and 61% had stopped smoking at least 6 months prior to their lung cancer diagnosis. Among never smokers, those with null (N) or low (L) genotype experienced a better 1-year-survival rate than those with a positive (P) or high (H) genotype. Patients with P or H at two loci (PP or PH) were compared with patients with N or L at one or both loci (other). Among never smokers, 1-year-survival rates were 60–78% for patients with PP or PH genotypes compared with 89–100% for other types. The survival advantage was greater among advanced-stage patients who were NL or NN than low-stage patients. Similar results were not observed among smokers. Conclusions: Glutathione-related genes may determine lung cancer survival. Our results, if confirmed, would suggest new directions to enhance cancer treatment, and provide easily measurable markers for clinicians to plan patient-specific therapy.

Introduction

Over the past half century, survival after a lung cancer diagnosis has improved little, particularly for patients with advanced disease [1], [2]. Currently, lung cancer treatment modalities are determined by tumor histology, disease stage, and influenced by a patient's performance status [1], [3]. If treated at all, patients with inoperable or advanced stage disease receive a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Anti-cancer drugs typically have a very narrow therapeutic index, meaning a close margin between clinical effective dose and toxicity limit dose. For any given treatment regimen, tumor response rate and patients’ survival time are unpredictable, even after adjusting for disease stage, histology, and performance status. There are no host-specific measures on which to base an optimal choice of the type, dose, delivery schedule or combination of these drugs. Therefore, individualized dose optimization algorithms of chemotherapy agents are desperately needed to maximize treatment efficacy and minimize unwanted toxicity.

Glutathione (GSH) synthesis and GSH-dependent enzymes (GSH system) are directly involved in detoxification or inactivation of several groups of major anti-cancer drugs [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Platinum-based compounds and alkylating agents are important drugs in lung cancer chemotherapy, and both are mainly inactivated through the GSH system. The key elements of this system, as shown in Fig. 1, are the amount of GSH itself and the enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of substrates to GSH. The important enzymes are γ-glutamylcystein synthetase (γ-GCS), glutathione-S-transferase-Pi (GSTπ), glutathione-S-transferase mu (GSTμ) and glutathione-S-transferase theta (GSTθ) [4], [8]. Two lines of evidence, from multiple cancer sites, indicate the important role of these enzymes in anticancer treatment sensitivity and responses [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. First, elevated GSH and/or GSH-dependent enzyme levels correlate with inferior treatment response [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Secondly, inhibition or reduction of GSH and/or GSH-system increases treatment response rates [12], [20], [21], [22], [35]. Genetic polymorphisms with functional significance have been well characterized for GSH-related enzymes [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44]. Testing for the presence of the genes which encode for these enzymes has the potential to offer clinicians a powerful tool in determining which patients are likely to respond to which drugs. In this study, we have tested the hypothesis that in patients with lung cancer, genotypes corresponding to low activity levels of critical enzymes in the GSH system are associated with improved short-term survival.

Section snippets

Study participants and data collection

The study group included 250 patients with pathologically confirmed primary lung cancer who were diagnosed and/or treated at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between 1997 and 1999 and were followed-up for 1 year. All of these cases have been enrolled with informed consent approved by Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. This study was designed to conduct genetic and molecular epidemiology research on lung cancer etiology and prognosis [45].

During the interview at enrollment, we obtained the

Results

Selected characteristics of the 250 patients at diagnosis are provided in Table 1. The gender ratio was 3:2 for male to female. Sixteen and one-half percent of the patients had never smoked cigarettes. Among tobacco users, 73% had quit smoking for at least 6 months before their lung cancer diagnosis. Information on pack-years of cigarette smoking was available for 206 (82.4%) patients, and over 84% of them had a history of 20 pack-years or greater, to a maximum of 200 pack-years. More than

Discussion

Our results provide preliminary evidence that genotypes corresponding to lower GSH metabolic system functions may be associated with improved lung cancer survival, particularly among never-smoking patients. In clinical practice, body surface area has been the uniform standard for computing the dose of anticancer drugs, yet wide variability in plasma active drug concentration and toxicity can be found among patients with the same body surface area. A more rational dose optimization algorithm

Acknowledgements

We owe gratitude to Dr M.S. Allen, Dr N.M. Lindor, Dr J.L. Myers, Dr D.E. Midthun, Dr J. Meyer, Dr S.N. Thibodeau, Dr C. Deschamps, Dr A.M. Patel, Dr V.F. Trastek, Dr A. Adjei, Dr A. Jatoi, and Dr E. Perez for their support in various aspects of this work. We thank M. Goodman and S. Ernst for secretarial support to this manuscript. This work has been supported in part by research grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA25224 from the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Public Health

References (65)

  • H. Ge et al.

    Analysis of l-myc and GSTM1 genotypes in Chinese non-small cell lung carcinoma patients

    Lung Cancer

    (1996)
  • T. Walle

    Assays of CYP2C8- and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of taxol in vivo and in vitro

    Methods Enzymol.

    (1996)
  • N. Claij et al.

    Microsatellite instability in human cancer: a prognostic marker for chemotherapy?

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1999)
  • J.C. Nesbitt et al.

    Cancer of the lung

  • H. Shen et al.

    Importance of glutathione and associated enzymes in drug response

    Oncol. Res.

    (1997)
  • J.D. Hayes et al.

    The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance

    Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (1995)
  • J.D. Hayes et al.

    Invited commentary: potential contribution of the glutathione S-transferase supergene family to resistance to oxidative stress

    Free Radical Res.

    (1995)
  • J. Carmichael et al.

    Glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes and glutathione peroxidase activity in normal and tumour samples from human lung

    Carcinogenesis (London)

    (1988)
  • J. Carmichael et al.

    Glutathione and related enzyme activity in human lung cancer cell lines

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1988)
  • T. Inoue et al.

    Glutathione S transferase Pi is a powerful indicator in chemotherapy of human lung squamous-cell carcinoma

    Respiration

    (1995)
  • F. Bai et al.

    Immunohistochemical expression of glutathione S-transferase-Pi can predict chemotherapy response in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1996)
  • Y. Nakanishi et al.

    Glutathione derivatives enhance Adriamycin cytotoxicity in a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line

    Anticancer Res.

    (1997)
  • A.G. Hall et al.

    Expression of mu class glutathione S-transferase correlates with event-free survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Cancer Res.

    (1994)
  • M.W. Sark et al.

    Cellular basis for differential sensitivity to cisplatin in human germ cell tumour and colon carcinoma cell lines

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1995)
  • F. Ali-Osman et al.

    Decreased DNA interstrand cross-linking and cytotoxicity induced in human brain tumor cells by 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea after in vitro reaction with glutathione

    Cancer Res.

    (1989)
  • S.V. Singh et al.

    Mechanism of cross-resistance to cisplatin in a mitomycin C-resistant human bladder cancer cell line

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1995)
  • J. Lutzky et al.

    Role of glutathione and dependent enzymes in anthracycline-resistant HL60/AR cells

    Cancer Res.

    (1989)
  • M. Benathan et al.

    Relationship between melanogenesis, glutathione levels and melphalan toxicity in human melanoma cells

    Melanoma Res.

    (1992)
  • Y. Fujiwara et al.

    Determinants of drug response in a cisplatin-resistant human lung cancer cell line

    Jpn. J. Cancer Res.

    (1990)
  • K. Hirazono et al.

    Immunohistochemical expression of glutathione S-transferase pi (GST-pi) and chemotherapy response in malignant ovarian tumors

    J. Obstet. Gynecol.

    (1995)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Expression of glutathione S-transferase-pi in operative specimens as marker of chemoresistance in patients with ovarian cancer

    J. Obstet. Gynecol. (Peking)

    (1997)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic and its modifier function as novel immunotargets in gastric adenocarcinoma

      2023, Asian Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mabel M demonstrated that the upregulation of GCLC and GCLM promote GSH synthesis in human granulosa cell tumor.40 Many studies have found that GCLC and GCLM were related to platinum drug resistance.41–43 According to the results of our present study, GCLC and GCLM are upregulated and play crucial roles in the development of gastric adenocarcinoma.

    • Genetic variation in glutathione metabolism and DNA repair genes predicts survival of small-cell lung cancer patients

      2010, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      High activity of the glutathione pathway may accelerate the excretion and reduce the concentration of platinum agents in cells. Deletion or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes in this pathway have been linked to varied clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [4–10]. Furthermore, the cytotoxic effect of platinum compounds on a DNA molecule can be reversed by the DNA repair mechanism consisting of several pathways and a network of many proteins.

    • Long-term survivorship in lung cancer: A review

      2006, Chest
      Citation Excerpt :

      The functional status or drug metabolism systems of the host also play a role in the fate of a lung cancer patient. Genomic variations of genes responsible for the immune response to the tumor, drug metabolism, or DNA repair systems may be part of the underlying mechanisms affecting long-term adverse clinical outcomes, as has been determined in their role in lung cancer development and progression, and short-term survival.2324252627 Issues of the significance of genetic susceptibility to a variety of environmental exposures, treatment-related toxicity, and vulnerability to poorer health and worse QoL need to be further investigated simultaneously.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text