An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80043-XGet rights and content

The ecological approach charted by J. J. Gibson and extended by others takes as its goal elucidating the natural laws that capture coordination of action with respect to sensory information. A kernel theme is the theory of affordances. Whether an affordance is realized (whether some action occurs) depends on the occasion (incl. the intentions of the actor) and on the availability of information that stabilizes and constrains the emerging action. The goal of our paper is to elaborate the implications of this general theory of perception and action for “S-R compatibility”, currently a family of research paradigms, empirical phenomena, and theoretical constructs rooted primarily in the information-processing approach. We make four claims: Theory and research in compatibility would benefit by (1) considering the identification of “the stimulus”, both distal and proximal, as one aim of experimental research, and thereby not relying on arbitrary “stimulus” properties; (2) identifying the goals and coordination of actions, rather than relying on current characterizations of “response” properties, which have little or nothing to do with the action system; (3) considering the task of the perceiver-actor to be detecting information appropriate to constrain those action degrees of free-dom left unconstrained by the task situation (instructions, intentions, etc.); and (4) exploiting the advances made by the dynamical systems approach to coordination in rhythmic movement. We summarize research motivated by each of these claims.

References (63)

  • BauerD.W. et al.

    Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1982)
  • BeekP.J. et al.

    Frequency locking, frequency modulation, and bifurcations in dynamic movement systems

  • BernsteinN.

    The coordination and regulation of movement

    (1967)
  • BootsmaR.J.

    The timing of rapid interceptive actions

    (1988)
  • ChonS. et al.

    Affordances and S-R compatibilities: The affect of a nominally irrelevant aversive stimulus

  • ChuaR.C. et al.

    Dynamical explorations of compatibility in perception-action coupling

  • FitchH. et al.

    On the control of activity: Some remarks from an ecological point of view

  • GibsonJ.J.

    The concept of the stimulus in psychology

    American Psychologist

    (1960)
  • GibsonJ.J.

    The senses considered as perceptual systems

    (1966)
  • GibsonJ.J.

    The ecological approach to visual perception

    (1979)
  • GoodmanD. et al.

    Exploring the functional significance of physiological tremor: A biospectroscopic approach

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1983)
  • GuiardY.

    The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (1983)
  • HakenH. et al.

    A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements

    Biological Cybernetics

    (1985)
  • HasbroucqT. et al.

    Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1991)
  • HeineW.-D.

    An ecological consideration of stimulus-response compatibility

    (1994)
  • HommelB.

    Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information

    Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung

    (1993)
  • HommelB.

    Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1995)
  • HommelB. et al.

    S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

    (1995)
  • HubbardA.W. et al.

    Visual movements of batters

    Research Quarterly

    (1954)
  • KnutssonE.

    An analysis of Parkinsonian gait

    Brain

    (1972)
  • KornblumS. et al.

    Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy

    Psychological Review

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text