Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 120, Issue 1, 30 August 2003, Pages 61-69
Psychiatry Research

Exposure to traumatic events and experiences: aetiological relationships with personality function

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(03)00172-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Empirical research has shown that the odds of experiencing traumatic events are influenced by genetic factors and the heritability of trauma exposure varies with the type of trauma. Traumatic events per se are unlikely to be heritable; more likely to be inherited are factors such as personality that influence the person's risk for entering into, or creating, potentially hazardous situations. With data from 406 twin pairs (222 monozygotic and 184 dizygotic twin pairs) from the urban general population, the present study used multiple regression analysis to identify personality variables associated with exposure to trauma, and estimated the degree to which these relationships were mediated by genetic factors. The experience of violent assaultive traumatic events was predicted by antisocial personality traits, specifically juvenile antisocial behavior, self-harming behavior, Psychoticism (e.g. adult antisocial behavior and substance misuse), and being open to new ideas and experiences. Genetic factors were found to partially mediate these relationships as indexed by the genetic correlation coefficient. The values of the genetic correlations were statistically significant and ranged from 0.14 to 0.36, accounting for 5–11% of the observed correlation between personality and trauma exposure. These findings suggest that heritable personality characteristics explain part of the variance in the likelihood of exposure to some classes of traumatic events.

Introduction

Twin studies of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reveal that the symptoms of this disorder are moderately heritable. For identical and fraternal male twins who had experienced combat, genetic factors accounted for approximately 30% of the total variance in symptoms (True et al., 1993). Similarly, genetic factors accounted for 26–36% in the variance of PTSD symptoms in a predominantly female sample of twins from the general population (Stein et al., 2002).

The odds of experiencing traumatic events are also influenced by genetic factors (e.g. Lyons et al., 1993, Koenen et al., 2002, Stein et al., 2002), and the heritability of trauma exposure varies with the type of trauma (Stein et al., 2002). Factor analysis of a questionnaire assessing life events identified two types of traumatic events: (1) assaultive traumatic events, such as being mugged, sexually assaulted, or beaten up, and (2) non-assaultive trauma, such as severe motor vehicle accidents, the sudden unexpected death of a loved one, and the experience of seemingly random events such as natural disasters. Stein et al. (2002) found that exposure to assaultive traumatic events was moderately heritable (20% of the variance due to genetic factors), whereas the experience of non-assaultive trauma was not heritable. Thus, PTSD can be seen as a result of two sets of genetic and environmental susceptibility factors: (1) those influencing trauma exposure, and (2) those influencing the symptoms resulting from exposure.

Traumatic events per se are unlikely to be heritable. More likely to be inherited are factors that influence the person's risk for entering into, or creating, potentially hazardous situations. There has been a good deal of research on risk factors for experiencing PTSD symptoms. For example, preexisting personality traits such as neuroticism have been implicated (e.g. Fauerbach et al., 2000). Less is known about the personality traits predicting trauma exposure. Twin research by Kendler et al. (2002) has shown that neuroticism is associated with increased risk for exposure to some kinds of traumatic events. Personality traits other than neuroticism are also likely to play a role. For example, Kirkpatrick et al. (1998) reported that sensation seeking or novelty seeking was associated with increased risk for being a victim of rape. In the Vietnam Era Twin Registry, a sample that consists solely of males, preexisting conduct disorder (which might be considered an early manifestation of antisocial personality traits) was a risk factor for both trauma exposure and subsequent PTSD symptoms (Koenen et al., 2002).

The aims of the present study are two-fold. The first aim is to identify which personality variables are associated with exposure to trauma. The second, more fundamental, aim is to investigate whether the association between personality traits and trauma exposure has a biological basis. Put simply, are the genes for particular personality traits associated with a greater risk of experiencing particular types of trauma?

Section snippets

Subjects

The subjects were 406 twin pairs from the Vancouver area, British Columbia, Canada, who participate as part of the UBC Twin Project, an on-going twin study of psychiatric dysfunction recruited via media appeals (see Jang et al., 2002, for a full description of the study). The sample consisted of 174 pairs of monozygotic (MZ) females (mean age=34.52 years, S.D.=17.29, range=16–86); 48 MZ male pairs (mean age=35.99, S.D.=14.16, range 16–79); 117 dizygotic (DZ) female pairs (mean age=31.30,

Results

Table 2 presents the correlations between each personality measure and the assaultive and non-assaultive trauma exposure score. For brevity, only the statistically significant correlations are presented. For the assaultive trauma factor score, the highest correlations among the personality disorder scales were with DAPP-DQ Self-Harming Behaviors (r=0.32) and Juvenile Antisocial Behavior (r=0.31), and Addictive Behavior (r=0.27). EPQ-R Psychoticism and NEO-FFI Openness to Experience from the

Discussion

The results of the present study show that particular personality traits are associated with exposure to certain types of trauma. In particular, the results suggest that antisocial personality traits are strongly related to the risk of experiencing assaultive trauma. The primary predictors that are in a pleiotropic relationship with exposure to assaultive trauma are DAPP-DQ Juvenile Antisocial Behavior (rG=0.22) and Self-Damaging Acts (rG=0.24). The Juvenile Antisocial Behavior scale assesses

Acknowledgements

This research was supported, in part, by a New Emerging Team Grant (PTS-63186) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research—Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction.

References (31)

  • R.M. Larstone et al.

    The relationship between Eysenck's P-E-N model of personality, the five-factor model of personality, and traits delineating personality disorder

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2002)
  • M. Schwab-Stone et al.

    No safe haven. II. The effects of violence exposure on urban youth

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • P.T. Costa et al.

    NEO-PI-R: Professional Manual

    (1992)
  • H.J. Eysenck et al.

    Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised

    (1992)
  • J.A. Fauerbach et al.

    Personality predictors of injury-related posttraumatic stress disorder

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (2000)
  • A. Farmer et al.

    The classification of depressions. Contemporary confusion revisited

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • D.N. Jackson

    The dynamics of structured personality tests

    Psychological Review

    (1971)
  • K.L. Jang et al.

    The aetiology of personality function: the University of British Columbia Twin Project

    Twin Research

    (2002)
  • K.L. Jang et al.

    Gender specific etiological differences in alcohol and drug problems: a behavioral genetic analysis

    Addiction

    (1997)
  • K.L. Jang et al.

    Intra- and extra-familial influences on alcohol and drug misuse: a twin study of gene–environment correlation

    Addiction

    (2001)
  • K.S. Kendler et al.

    Models for the joint effect of genotype and environment on liability to psychiatric illness

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • K.S. Kendler et al.

    The etiology of phobias: an evaluation of the stress-diathesis model

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • D.G. Kirkpatrick et al.

    Rape, other violence against women, and posttraumatic stress disorder

  • K.C. Koenen et al.

    A twin registry study of familial and individual risk factors for trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (2002)
  • Cited by (73)

    • General risk or individual vulnerability? Individual differences in young adults' health risk behaviour after childhood trauma

      2019, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, in our study correlations between death and the personality traits (i.e., conscientiousness, neuroticism) were weaker than between violence and sexual abuse, and the personality traits. This may point towards (shared) genetic vulnerabilities underlying both certain personality traits and sensitivity for the experience of interpersonal traumatic events (but not death or other person-independent events) (Jang, Stein, Taylor, Asmundson, & Livesley, 2003), but genetically informed designs are needed to examine this in more detail. In line with previous studies on stress and adjustment (Forehand et al., 1998), multiple traumatic experiences had cumulative effects and were related to a larger number of health risk behaviours.

    • Female psychopathy: A descriptive national study of socially dangerous female NGRI offenders

      2020, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore BPD is thought to represent the phenotypical expression of psychopathy in females. The prevalence of psychopathy is also lower in women than in men due to several causes, which may interact with each other (Farrington, 2007; Jang, Stein, Taylor, Asmundson, & Livesley, 2003; Krischer, Sevecke, & Lehmkuhl, 2007; Wood & Eagly, 2002). Psychopathy is observed in 11–17.4% of women who commit violent acts, as compared to the 31% estimated among their male counterparts (Andershed, 2012), but women commit violent crimes less often than men with the same psychopathic traits (Kreis & Cooke, 2011), so it is possible that the role of the psychopathic dimension in the crime could be overlooked in female offenders or on the other hand that psychopathy in women is underestimated (Forouzan & Cooke, 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text