Elsevier

Child Abuse & Neglect

Volume 25, Issue 8, August 2001, Pages 1001-1014
Child Abuse & Neglect

The Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC): reliability and association with abuse exposure in a multi-site study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00253-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: The Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC) is a 90-item caretaker-report measure of children’s trauma- and abuse-related symptomatology. It contains two reporter validity scales and eight clinical scales [Post-traumatic Stress-Intrusion (PTS-I), Post-traumatic Stress-Avoidance (PTS-AV), Post-traumatic Stress-Arousal (PTS-AR), Post-traumatic Stress-Total (PTS-TOT), Sexual Concerns (SC), Dissociation (DIS), Anxiety (ANX), Depression (DEP), and Anger/Aggression (ANG)], as well as an item assessing hours per week of caretaker contact with the child. This paper introduces the TSCYC and describes its psychometric properties in a multisite validity study.

Method: A total of 219 TSCYCs administered by six clinician/researchers across the United States were analyzed for scale reliability and association with several types of childhood maltreatment.

Results: The TSCYC clinical scales have good reliability and are associated with exposure to childhood sexual abuse, physical abuse, and witnessing domestic violence. The PTS-I, PTS-AV, PTS-AR, and PTS-TOT scales were most predictive, followed by SC in the case of sexual abuse and DIS in the case of physical abuse. There were a small number of age, sex, and race effects on TSCYC scores.

Conclusions: The TSCYC appears to have reasonable psychometric characteristics, and correlates as expected with various types of trauma exposure. Subject to continued validation and the development of general population norms, its use as a clinical measure is supported.

Résumé

Objectif: Le Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC) mesure grâce à une enquête remplie par la personne chargée d’un enfant la symptomatologie liée au traumatisme et aux sévices. Elle comporte deux échelles de validité concernant l’expert et 8 échelles cliniques (stress post-traumatique-intrusion (PTS-I), stress post-traumatique-évitement (PTS-AV), stress-post-traumatique-début (PTS-AR), stress post-traumatique-total (PTS-TOT), intérêts sexuels (SC), dissociation (DIS), anxiété ANX), dépression (DEP) et colère-agressivité (ANG), ainsi qu’une évaluation en heures passées pae semaine par l’adulte concerné avec l’enfant. Cet article présente le TSCYC et décrit ses propriétés psychométriques dans une étude de validité à plusieurs emplacements.

Méthode: Au total, 219 TSCYC ont été administrés par six cliniciens-chercheurs dans l’ensembles des Etats-Unis et analysés selon la fiabilité et l’association avec différents types de mauvais traitements.

Résultats: Les échelles TSCYC ont une bonne fiabilité et sont associées à l’exposition à des sévices physiques et sexuels et au fait d’être témoin de la violence domestique. Les échelles PTS-I, PTS-AV, PTS-AR, et PTS-TOT offrent la meilleure prédiction, suivies par SC dans le cas des sévices sexuels et DIS dans le cas des sévices physiques. Il y a un petit nombre d’effets concernant l’âge, le sexe et la race sur les scores du TSCYC.

Conclusions:Le TSCYC semble posséder des caractéristiques psychométriques raisonnables. Il est en corrélation, comme on s’y attendait, avec l’exposition à des traumatismes variés. Ceci est en faveur de son utilisation en tant que mesure clinique s’il est soumis à une validation continue et au développement de normes pour la population générale.

Resumen

Objetivo: El Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC) es una medida de informe cumplimentada por el cuidador y compuesta por 90 items que evalúa la sintomatologı́a relacionada con el maltrato y el trauma infantil. Contiene dos escalas de validez y ocho escalas clı́nicas (Estrés Postraumático-Intrusión [PTS-I], Estrés Postraumático-Evitación [PTS-AV], Estrés Postraumático-Activación [PTS-AR], Estrés Postraumático-Total [PTS-TOT], Preocupación Sexual [SC], Disociación [DIS], Ansiedad [ANX], Depresión [DEP], e Ira/Agresión [ANG], ası́ como un item que valora el número de horas por semana que el cuidador tiene contacto con el/la niño/a. Este artı́culo presenta el TSCYC y describe sus propiedades psicométricas en un estudio de validez aplicado varios lugares.

Método: Un total de 219 TSCYCs, administrados por seis médicos/investigadores a lo largo de Estados Unidos, fueron analizados para conocer la fiabilidad de la escala y su asociación con diferentes tipos de maltrato infantil.

Resultados: La escalas clı́nicas TSCYC tienen una buena fiabilidad y están asociadas con la exposición del niño al abuso sexual, al maltrato fı́sico, y a ser testigo de violencia doméstica. Las escalas PTS-I, PTS-AV, PTS-AR, y PTS-TOT fueron las más predictivas seguidas por el SC en el caso del abuso sexual y por el DIS en el caso de maltrato fı́sico. Hubo un número pequeño de efectos de edad, sexo y raza en puntuaciones de TSCYC.

Introduction

Despite significant advances in our understanding of psychological trauma and its potential effects and the increased availability of effective treatments for trauma-related conditions, there are surprisingly few standardized, trauma-relevant measures available for children. This relative lack of assessment resources becomes especially significant when one considers the wide variety of traumatic events to which children are regularly exposed. These include natural disasters (Green et al., 1991); physical and sexual child abuse Berliner and Elliott 1996, Kolko 1996; witnessing spousal violence Grych et al 2000, Jaffe et al 1990; war Baker 1990, Sack et al 1986; and physical and sexual assaults by peers or other noncaretakers Boney-McCoy and Finkelhor 1995, Singer et al 1995.

Children’s exposure to such traumas, in turn, has been associated with a wide variety of negative mental health outcomes, including anxiety and depression Fergusson et al 1996, Lanktree et al 1991, Margolin and Gordis 2000, Martinez and Richters 1993, post-traumatic stress and dissociation Elliott and Briere 1994, McLeer et al 1998, Singer et al 1995, anger and aggression Kolbo et al 1996, Lanktree et al 1991, Shakoor and Chalmers 1991, and, especially in sexual abuse victims, sexual symptoms and age-inappropriate sexual behavior Friedrich 1993, Friedrich 1994, Green et al 1991.

Those conducting studies on the potential impacts of traumatic events on children’s mental health have responded to the relative dearth of standardized tests in this area by creating a number of research measures. These include the Children’s PTSD Inventory (Saigh, 1989), Child Post-Traumatic Stress Reaction Index (RI; Pynoos et al., 1993), Child Dissociative Checklist (CDC; Putnam, Helmers, & Trickett, 1993), Children’s Attributions and Perceptions Scale (CAPS; Mannarino, Cohen, & Berman, 1994), Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R; Wolfe, Gentile, Michienzi, Sas, & Wolfe, 1991), and the Sexual Abuse Fear Evaluation (SAFE; Wolfe & Wolfe, 1986).

Unfortunately, these research measures typically lack the norms and data on clinical psychometrics that are needed before the assessor can determine the actual clinical implication of a given score. For example, in the absence of data on the distribution of scores in the general population, a score of Y on measure X cannot be interpreted in terms of its abnormality and, thus, its specific clinical meaning. Similarly, for optimal applicability to clinical settings, the reliability and validity of a test in clinical groups must be known. Because most research measures typically lack such data, they cannot be applied with confidence in general clinical practice (Briere, 1997).

In contrast to these various research measures, there are only two standardized, normed tests of childhood trauma-related symptomatology available to clinicians: the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC; Briere, 1996), a multiscale self-report measure of trauma-related symptomatology, and the Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI; Friedrich, 1998), a caretaker-report measure of abnormal sexual behavior frequently seen in sexual abuse victims. The TSCC provides a review of those symptom clusters often associated with trauma in children, but requires that the child be at least 8 years of age for administration. This age limit reflects the concern that younger children may have insufficient cognitive development to fully understand what a given psychological symptom or internal state actually represents, or lack the reading comprehension necessary to respond to written test items regarding that state or symptom. The CSBI avoids this issue by relying on caretaker report, but is limited to a review of sexual behaviors.

The cutoff of 8 years for the TSCC and the absence of other broad-band standardized tests for children under 8 represents a real problem for clinicians specializing in child trauma. Most importantly, many children are first abused, neglected, or otherwise traumatized well before this age. As a result, a significant proportion of children brought to clinics, child crisis centers, or emergency rooms with trauma exposure cannot be evaluated at the level possible for those over age 7.

In the absence of standardized trauma measures, younger children must be assessed either by their responses to clinicians’ questions during a diagnostic or intake interview, or through parent/caretaker symptom report. The first option can be helpful, but the subjectivity of the typical clinical interview means that effective and comprehensive evaluation rests on the abilities and training of the interviewer. Furthermore, such informal assessment is intrinsically non-normative: beyond the clinical experience of the interviewer, such an approach offers little information about whether a specific symptom or behavior represents relatively normal functioning, subclinical difficulties, or clinical levels of disturbance.

The limitations of the regular clinical interview approach can be addressed, in part, through the use of structured interviews with specific items tapping trauma-related symptoms. Examples of this approach are the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, Child and Adolescent version (CAPS-C; Nader et al., 1996) and the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (CITES-R; Wolfe et al., 1991). The CAPS-C yields a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD, and appears to have reasonable validity in clinical practice (Nader, 1997). However, this interview can take over an hour to administer; a logistic problem that limits its usefulness in many clinical contexts. In addition, by virtue of its focus on PTSD, per se, it does not evaluate the various other psychological difficulties often associated with childhood trauma.

The CITES-R yields scores on scales measuring post-traumatic stress, sexual issues, perceptions of social support after disclosure, and cognitive attributions. Recent research supports the psychometric reliability and validity of the CITES-R (Crouch, Smith, Ezzell, & Saunders, 1999). However, the interview is limited to sexual abuse impacts, does not have established norms for interpreting scores in clinical settings, and requires that the child be at least 8 years of age.

The second evaluation option (parent-report measures) may be helpful to the extent that it involves standardized assessment and allows the clinician to compare a child’s symptomatology to what would be normative for a child of his or her sex and age. Unfortunately, with the exception of the Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI; Friedrich, 1998), the only standardized, normed parent/caretaker-report tests available to clinicians are generic [e.g., the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL); Achenbach, 1991] and do not tap post-traumatic symptoms to any major extent. As has been suggested for generic adult measures (Briere, 1997), clinical reliance on generic tests may mean that the post-traumatic symptoms of many abused or traumatized children go unassessed or, in some cases, are misinterpreted as evidence of other forms of disturbance.

An additional problem with parent/caretaker reports of children’s symptoms is the second-hand nature of this approach. Whenever the clinician relies on a caretaker’s report of a child’s functioning, there is the risk that the reporting parent’s perceptions are biased by his or her personal concerns, psychopathology, limited contact with the child, or other motivations to see (or present) the child as more or less symptomatic than may actually be the case (Briere & Elliott, 1997). As a result, in the absence of additional data, it is not always clear to what extent the caretaker’s responses on caretaker-report measures reflects actual symptomatology in the child.

In response to these various issues, the TSCYC (Briere, in press) was developed. This test is a 90-item caretaker-report measure that can be used to assess trauma symptoms in children from ages 3 to 12. Caretakers rate each symptom on a 4-point scale [from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very often)] according to how often it has occurred in the previous month. Unlike other parent/caretaker report measures, the TSCYC contains specific scales to ascertain the validity of caretaker reports and evaluates a range of post-traumatic symptoms. In addition, on completion of normative studies, the TSCYC will allow comparison of a given child’s caretaker-reported symptoms in a given area to a large, representative sample of caretaker reports from the general population.

Because caretaker-report measures introduce a new source of potential difficulties, that of intentional or inadvertent misreporting of the child’s psychological status, the TSCYC includes additional features that assess the caretaker’s rating style and actual familiarity with the child. In this regard, the TSCYC contains two validity scales that assess potential over-report (Atypical Response) and under-report (Response Level) of the child’s symptoms. Furthermore, the TSCYC includes an item that asks “[o]n average, how many hours do you spend in the same place (for example, at home) with him or her each week, not counting when he or she is asleep?” which is rated on a scale from 1 (0–1 hours) to 7 (over 60 hours).

The TSCYC contains eight clinical scales, Post-traumatic Stress-Intrusion (PTS-I), Post-traumatic Stress-Avoidance (PTS-AV), Post-traumatic Stress-Arousal (PTS-AR), Sexual Concerns (SC), Dissociation (DIS), Anxiety (ANX), Depression (DEP), and Anger/Aggression (ANG), as well as a summary post-traumatic stress scale, Post-traumatic Stress-Total (PTS-TOT). These scales allow a detailed evaluation of post-traumatic stress symptoms (and a tentative PTSD diagnosis), as well as providing information on other symptoms such as anxiety, depression, anger, and abnormal sexual behavior. Typical items of the TSCYC are: Looking sad, Bad dreams or nightmares, Living in a fantasy world, Pretending to have sex, Drawing pictures about an upsetting thing that happened to him or her, and Throwing things at friends or family members.

This paper describes the reliability of the TSCYC and its association with several forms of child trauma/maltreatment in a multisite clinical sample. A future paper will outline the convergent validity of this measure with reference to other common tests of abuse- or trauma-specific symptomatology.

Section snippets

Methods

The preliminary version of the TSCYC consisted of 120 items, adapted and expanded from the TSCC to assess caretaker report of children as young as 3 years of age. Items were written by the first author to tap each of the six symptom groups evaluated by the scales of the TSCC (i.e., Post-traumatic Stress, Sexual Concerns, Dissociation, Anxiety, Depression, and Anger), adjusted to reflect the caretaker’s perspective. There was no attempt, however, to create TSCYC items that matched existing TSCC

Validity sample characteristics

The validity sample consisted of caretaker-reports of 219 children, collected by six clinicians or researchers. The mean age of these children was 7.1 years (SD = 2.6), major racial representations were Non-Hispanic Caucasian (N = 80, 38.3%), Black/African American (N = 53, 25.4%), and Hispanic (N = 58, 27.8%), and the majority of children were female (N = 115, 62.8%). According to clinician determination of the child’s maltreatment history, using whatever interview protocol was normally

Discussion

This report documents the psychometric characteristics of a new caretaker-report test of post-traumatic symptoms in younger children. The clinical scales of the TSCYC appear to demonstrate good reliability and to be associated with exposure to maltreatment in a clinical sample of generally maltreated children. The TSCYC scales most associated with different types of childhood abuse were those measuring post-traumatic stress, followed by sexual concerns and dissociation. The three mood-related

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks the following expert panel members for their feedback on the initial version of the TSCYC: Lucy Berliner, MSW; Eve Carlson, PhD; Mark Chaffin, PhD; Judith Cohen, MD; Kathleen Faller, PhD; Bill Friedrich, PhD; Eliana Gil, PhD; Cheryl Lanktree, PhD; Julie Lipovsky, PhD; and Margaret Stuber, MD.

References (35)

  • S Boney-McCoy et al.

    Psychosocial sequelae of violent victimization in a national youth sample

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1995)
  • J Briere

    Methodological issues in the study of sexual abuse effects

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1992)
  • J Briere

    Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC) professional manual

    (1996)
  • J Briere

    Psychological assessment of adult posttraumatic states

    (1997)
  • Briere, J. (in press). Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC) professional manual. Odessa, FL:...
  • J Briere et al.

    Psychological assessment of interpersonal victimization effects in adults and children

    Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

    (1997)
  • J.L Crouch et al.

    Measuring reactions to sexual trauma among childrencomparing the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale and the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children

    Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text