ArticlesExtended duration dual antiplatelet therapy and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction
Treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy with a combination of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is widely used for the prevention of ischaemic complications associated with many cardiovascular diseases, including peripheral arterial, cerebrovascular, and coronary artery disease. In each of these diseases, the duration of treatment that best balances the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy is uncertain. In patients at high risk of ischaemic events, dual antiplatelet therapy might prevent potentially fatal thrombotic events. However, risks of adverse events with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy, mainly mediated through bleeding, also exist and could outweigh benefits, such that overall mortality is unchanged or even increased.
Findings of studies assessing the effect of extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy on mortality have varied. Results of the Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events (CHARISMA) trial1 showed no difference in all-cause mortality in a heterogeneous population with or at risk of cardiovascular disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin alone. However, findings of the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3)2 trial showed a significant increase in mortality associated with dual antiplatelet therapy compared with aspirin alone in patients with recent lacunar infarcts, an unexpected finding that was not entirely attributable to bleeding. Most recently, the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study,3 an international multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that compared 30 with 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with stents, showed that continuation of treatment beyond 12 months in participants given drug-eluting stents was associated with reduction in ischaemic events (stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction), but also an unexpected increase in non-cardiovascular death and nominal difference in total mortality over the primary analysis period.
If true, an increase in non-cardiovascular and all-cause mortality due to extended treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy would have an important effect on the many cardiovascular patients treated with these agents every year. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy on all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality by doing a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of patients with cardiovascular disease.
Section snippets
Search strategy and selection criteria
We searched Medline (with the PubMed interface), Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant randomised clinical trials published before Oct 1, 2014. The following search terms were used: “clopidogrel”, “Plavix”, “prasugrel”, “Effient”, “ticagrelor”, “Brilinta”, “thienopyridine”, “dual antiplatelet therapy”, “DAPT”, “death”, “mortality”, “survival”, “randomized controlled trial”, “random”, “random allocation”, “double-blind”, and “single-blind”. We manually
Results
Our systematic literature search identified 2456 articles, of which 13 met the inclusion criteria for this analysis (figure 1). After adding results of the DAPT Study, we included 14 studies comprising 69 644 participants in our meta-analysis.1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The subject populations enrolled in the trials were as follows: ten trials of patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome (n=42 616, 1344
Discussion
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 69 000 participants in 14 randomised trials, with average follow-up of 24 months, we did not detect an association between extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy and all-cause, cardiovascular, or non-cardiovascular mortality. The meta-analysis findings were not sensitive to the exclusion of any trial, and although the enrolled populations varied, we noted no substantial heterogeneity in trial results with respect to the association
References (25)
- et al.
Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation Followed by Six Versus Twelve-Month - Dual Antiplatelet Therapy- The SECURITY Randomized Clinical Trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2014) - et al.
A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET Trial (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation)
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2012) - et al.
Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events
N Engl J Med
(2006) - et al.
Effects of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with recent lacunar stroke
N Engl J Med
(2012) - Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N...
- et al.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
BMJ
(2011) - et al.
Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints
Stat Med
(1998) The asymptomatic joint distribution of the efficient scores test for the proportional hazards model calculated over time
Biometrika
(1981)- et al.
Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review
Health Technol Assess
(2000) - et al.
The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions
Stat Med
(2009)