ArticlesStroke prevention with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF III): randomised controlled trial
Introduction
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation carries a substantial risk of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism.1 Results of several randomised trials have shown that adjusted-dose warfarin provides highly effective prophylaxis,2 reducing stroke by 62% compared with placebo in a meta-analysis. Benefit is tempered, however, by a 7–10-fold increase in intracranial haemorrhage, particularly in elderly patients.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Interactions of vitamin K antagonists with food, drugs,7 and other factors require dose adjustments and regular monitoring of anticoagulation. Expense and inconvenience8, 9, 10 associated with this unpredictability contribute to under-treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke,11, 12 creating a need for easily administered safe alternatives.
Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor under investigation as an anticoagulant for prevention and treatment of thromboembolism.13 Its pharmacokinetic profile is predictable and stable over time,14, 15 and unaffected by bodyweight, age, sex, or ethnic origin.15, 16, 17 With a rapid onset of action and metabolism independent of the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system, ximelagatran has a low potential for drug interactions and no known food interactions,14, 15, 18 making coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments unnecessary.15, 16, 17
In this report, we describe the main results of SPORTIF III (Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation), one of two long-term phase III studies comparing safety and efficacy of ximelagatran with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for ischaemic stroke.19
Section snippets
Methods
The rationale and design of SPORTIF III have been described.19 In brief, this study was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial comparing oral ximelagatran with adjusted-dose warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation.
Endpoints and assessments
The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of ximelagatran with that of warfarin for prevention of all stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) and systemic embolic events. Secondary endpoints included composites of (1) major and minor bleeding; (2) treatment discontinuation; (3) ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and systemic embolism; and (4) death, stroke, systemic embolism, and acute myocardial infarction. Stroke was defined as abrupt onset of a focal neurological deficit in the
Patients and follow-up
The outcome of all participants over the course of the trial is shown in figure 1. Of the 3410 randomised patients, three withdrew by their baseline visit and never received study drug. These were excluded from all analyses; hence the study population consisted of 3407 patients and subsequent references to all patients in the trial refer to this cohort. Five patients in each treatment group did not have the qualifying additional risk factors. Three of these patients terminated study drug within
Discussion
In this study, we have established efficacy of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in a fixed dose compared with well-controlled warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, although anticoagulation intensity was not monitored or regulated in patients assigned to ximelagatran, these patients had less bleeding than those assigned to warfarin and carefully adjusted according to contemporary treatment standards.
References (30)
- et al.
Ximelagatran versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: SPORTIF II—a dose-guiding, tolerability, and safety study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003) Ximelagatran compared with warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: rationale, objectives, and design of a pair of clinical studies and baseline patient characteristics (SPORTIF III and V)
Am Heart J
(2003)- et al.
Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality
Am Heart J
(2003) - et al.
Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation
Lancet
(1989) - et al.
Ximelagatran and melagatran compared with dalteparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: the METHRO II randomised trial
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study
Stroke
(1991) - et al.
Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
Ann Intern Med
(1999) Bleeding during antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation
Arch Intern Med
(1996)- et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation
Eur Heart J
(2001) - et al.
Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation
Chest
(2001)
Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range
Chest
Interactions of warfarin with drugs and food
Ann Intern Med
Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischemia
N Engl J Med
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at low risk of stroke during treatment with aspirin: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III Study
JAMA
Primary prevention of arterial thromboembolism in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation in primary care: randomised controlled trial comparing two intensities of coumarin with aspirin
BMJ
Cited by (0)
Investigators are listed at end of report