Successive Approximations to a Model of Human Motor Programming

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60028-6Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter describes a series of experiments on the cognitive activity that immediately precedes and allows the execution of voluntary actions. Cognitive activity is referred to as “motor programming” and its resultant representations are referred to as “motor programs.” The control of finger sequences is important in keyboard entry and musical performances. Finger sequences can be performed extremely rapidly and can be executed without direct conscious control. The chapter describes the processes of motor programming and the structure of motor programs. The data of interest are the times and identities of produced responses. If the timing of responses within a sequence changes as a function of an alternative sequence, the changes can be attributed to the operations underlying the programming of the sequence to be performed. A corollary of the motor-program editor model is that successive response sequences can be programmed by changing features that distinguish one sequence from the next. This method of programming is more efficient than the one in which each sequence must be programmed from scratch regardless of its relation to the sequence that has just been performed.

References (31)

  • N.F. Johnson

    On the relationship between sentence structure and the latency in generating the sentence

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1966)
  • N.F. Johnson

    The role of chunking and organization in the process of recall

  • R.S. Kayne

    Connectedness and binary branching

    (1984)
  • K.S. Lashley

    The problem of serial order in behavior

  • E.H. Lenneberg

    Biological foundations of language

    (1967)
  • Cited by (49)

    • The developing cognitive substrate of sequential action control in 9- to 12-month-olds: Evidence for concurrent activation models

      2015, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Through the years many influential theoretical incarnations of sequential action representation have been conceived (de Kleijn, Kachergis, & Hommel, 2014). All of these theories hold that sequential actions consist of elementary actions that are somehow combined into sequences, as suggested the observation that the speed of sequence-initiation increases with the number of elements therein (e.g., Henry & Rogers, 1960; Rosenbaum, 1987). The theories can be distinguished into three ontological types that differ with respect to the representations action control operates on.

    • The cognitive nature of action - functional links between cognitive psychology, movement science, and robotics

      2009, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      One set of studies has focused on a hierarchy of different levels of representation (e.g., see Saltzman, 1979; Keele, 1986; Rosenbaum, 1987; Perrig and Hofer, 1989). Other studies, in contrast, have focused more strongly on the aspect of a hierarchic execution regulation (e.g., Rosenbaum, 1987; Greene, 1988; Keele et al., 1990; Hacker, 1998). In contrast, the model proposed here views the functional construction of actions (Schack, 2004b; Schack and Bar-Eli, 2007; Schack and Hackfort, 2007) on the basis of a reciprocal assignment of performance-oriented regulation levels and representational levels (see Table 1).

    • Conscious intentions in the control of skilled mental activity

      2002, Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text