AuditAccuracy of Clinical Diagnosis of Internal Derangement of the Knee by Extended Scope Physiotherapists and Orthopaedic Doctors: Retrospective audit
Section snippets
Background
Extended scope physiotherapists (ESPs) were introduced in the late 1980s (Byles and Ling, 1989). Although the exact nature of their role varied between org-anisations, there was increasing recog-nition that senior musculoskeletal phys-iotherapists had the knowledge and experience to carry out some of the clinical assessment duties traditionally performed by doctors in the same field (Hockin and Bannister, 1994). By includ-ing ESPs within clinical teams in outpatient departments, their presence
Purpose
The main aim behind this audit was to establish whether an ESP in one of the orthopaedic outpatient clinics was making reasonable clinical decisions when compared with those of her medical counterparts.
The secondary aim was to establish the overall accuracy of the orthopaedic team and to review standards for diagnostic accuracy in internal derangement of the knee.
Methods
The audit was carried out retrospectively on patients listed for arthroscopy by one orthopaedic consultant's team, comprising one consultant, various specialist registrars, staff grade doctors, senior house officers and an ESP, during a five-month period in 1998. Patients were excluded from the audit if they were specifically listed for arthroscopic ass-essment only. All data were taken from medical notes and information was collected and analysed by one person (JG). The trust's confidentiality
Results
A total of 128 sets of patients' medical notes were examined. Table 1 illustrates the proportion of patients seen by each member of the orthopaedic team. The ESP saw only 23 (18%) of the 128 patients who underwent arthroscopy within the clinic during the five-month period of the audit. The remaining 105 (82%) patients were listed for arthroscopy by the doctors in the orthopaedic team. A breakdown is given in table 1.
The outcomes of each patient were categorised by diagnostic accuracy, and it
Discussion
The main aim of this audit was to establish whether the ESP was making reasonable clinical decisions compared with her medical counterparts. The results suggest that the ESP was actually more accurate than the doctors in listing patients correctly for arthroscopy. The second aim was to establish the overall accuracy of the orthopaedic team and review the standards for diagnostic accuracy. The audit showed that the team's results fell below the standards set.
With regard to the proportion of
Recommendations and Actions
A standard has now been implemented for layout and dictation of clinical notes in order that the clinical diagnosis and action are clear, facilitating both patient care and audit. New avenues for use of ESPs have been initiated in the form of independent triage clinics.
Guidelines have been written on the criteria for listing for an examination under anaesthetic and arthroscopy or conversely an MRI scan under this consultant.
Thirty of the 128 patients who underwent arthroscopy had MRI
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Dr Joanne Thomas PhD BSc.
References (9)
- et al.
‘Orthopaedic out-patients: A fresh approach’
Physiotherapy
(1989) ‘Expanding the scope of physiotherapy: Clinical physiotherapists in consultants' clinics’
Manual Therapy
(1996)- et al.
‘The physiotherapist as orthopaedic assistant in a back pain clinic’
Physiotherapy
(1995) ‘An RCT: Shifting the boundaries of doctors and physiotherapists in orthopaedic outpatient departments’
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
(1999)
Cited by (0)
This paper is based on a presentation at the CSP Annual Congress in October 2001.
- 1
Mrs Joanna Gardiner MCSP is an extended scope physiotherapist at Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport.
- 2
Mr Philip Turner FRCS is a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport.