Elsevier

Obstetrics & Gynecology

Volume 102, Issue 2, August 2003, Pages 367-382
Obstetrics & Gynecology

Reviews
Prenatal bladder drainage in the management of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00577-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the effect of prenatal bladder drainage on perinatal survival in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction.

Data sources

Relevant articles were identified by searching the databases MEDLINE (1966–2002), EMBASE (1988–2002), and the Cochrane library (2000;4).

Methods of study selection

Studies were selected if the effect of prenatal bladder drainage (vesicocentesis, vesicoamniotic shunt, or open fetal bladder surgery) on perinatal survival was reported in fetuses with ultrasonic evidence of lower urinary tract obstruction. Study selection, quality assessment, and data abstraction were performed independently and in duplicate.

Tabulation, integration, and results

Sixteen observational studies that included nine case series (147 fetuses) and seven controlled series (195 fetuses) were identified. Study characteristics and quality were recorded for each study. Data on the effect of bladder drainage on perinatal survival were abstracted. Where controlled data were available, 2 × 2 tables were generated to compare the effects of bladder drainage versus no bladder drainage on perinatal survival. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were used as summary measures of effect, and the results were stratified according to predicted fetal prognoses (based on ultrasound features and fetal urinary electrolytes). Among controlled studies, bladder drainage appeared to improve perinatal survival relative to no drainage (OR 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 5.9; P = .03). However, this observation was largely because among the subgroup of fetuses with a poor prognosis there was a marked improvement (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.2, 52.9; P = .03). Improved perinatal outcome was also suggested in those fetuses considered to have a good prognosis (OR 2.8; 95% CI 0.7, 10.8; P = .13).

Conclusion

There is a lack of high quality evidence to reliably inform clinical practice regarding prenatal bladder drainage in fetuses with ultrasonic evidence of lower urinary tract obstruction. The limited available evidence suggests that prenatal bladder drainage may improve perinatal survival in these fetuses, particularly those with poor predicted prognoses. Further research in the form of a multicenter randomized controlled trial is required to assess the short- and long-term effects of this intervention.

Section snippets

Sources

Relevant literature was identified by searching general bibliographic databases, MEDLINE (1966–2002), and EMBASE (1988–2002) using a combination of the key words “congenital urinary obstruction,” “invasive procedure,” and “prenatal diagnosis”; their word variants; and MeSH. In addition, the Cochrane Library (2000, issue 4) was searched. Reference lists of all known reviews and primary studies were checked and the specialist journal Prenatal Diagnosis was manually searched. Unpublished data were

Study selection

Two reviewers (TJC and WLM) independently extracted data from all articles meeting the selection criteria, including data on features of methodological quality. Quality assessment involved scrutinizing study designs and the relevant features of population, intervention, and outcome17:

  • 1.

    Study design. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where intervention (vesicocentesis, vesicoamniotic shunt insertion, or open shunt insertion–corrective surgery) was compared with no intervention were considered

Results

As shown in Figure 1, the electronic search yielded 362 citations, of which 30 were considered potentially relevant. Examination of their full texts revealed that eight were duplicates and six did not meet the selection criteria (see Appendix). Thus, a total of 16 primary studies (all in English), including 342 fetuses were selected for review (Table 1). No randomized trials were identified. Nine studies were case series (147 fetuses) and seven were controlled studies (195 fetuses).

Details of

Conclusion

Our review shows that there is a lack of high-quality evidence to reliably inform clinical practice regarding prenatal bladder drainage in fetuses with ultrasonic evidence of lower urinary tract obstruction. The limited available evidence suggests that in utero fetal bladder drainage may improve perinatal survival in these fetuses, and this finding is consistent whether voluntary termination of pregnancies is included or excluded. Those fetuses with poor predicted prognoses, as determined by

References (36)

  • P.L. Glick et al.

    Management of the fetus with congenital hydronephrosis IIPrognostic criteria and selection for treatment

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1985)
  • C.H. Rodeck et al.

    Ultrasound guided invasive procedures in obstetrics

    Clin Obstet Gynecol

    (1983)
  • D.C. Merrill et al.

    Urinary tract obstruction

  • B.S. Mahoney et al.

    Fetal urethral obstructionUS evaluation

    Radiology

    (1985)
  • A. Reuss et al.

    Antenatal diagnosis of renal tract anomalies by ultrasound

    Pediatr Nephrol

    (1987)
  • D.F. Thomas et al.

    Pre-natal diagnosisHow useful is it?

    Br J Urol

    (1985)
  • M.S. Golbus et al.

    Prenatal diagnosis and treatment of fetal hydronephrosis

    Semin Perinatol

    (1983)
  • F.A. Manning et al.

    Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus. Report of the International Fetal Surgery Registry

    N Engl J Med

    (1986)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Outcomes in fetuses diagnosed with megacystis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

      2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    • Prenatal renal parenchymal area as a predictor of early end-stage renal disease in children with vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction

      2018, Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In order to prevent such complications, research has been directed at circumventing the pathology by in utero vesicocentesis or vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS). It has been shown that VAS and other bladder drainage techniques for fetal LUTO will ameliorate pulmonary hypoplasia and will increase survival rates in patients with an initial poor prognosis [8]. However, it remains uncertain if these interventions have significant benefit for renal function in humans.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text