Original communication
The Impact of Health Literacy on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Diabetes Receiving Care in an Inner-City Hospital

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30469-7Get rights and content

Background

: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is considered to be 1 of the cornerstones of diabetes self-management. It is unclear whether inadequate health literacy affects SMBG.

Objective

: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between health literacy and SMBG.

Methods

: This was a cross-sectional survey of 189 patients with diabetes, aged 18 to 65 years, receiving care in a large urban, public health care setting. We measured health literacy using the shortened version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. The diabetes care profile was used to determine the use of self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Results

: Most (60.9%) of the survey participants were assessed as functionally health literate. The majority (90.9%) of the study participants reported testing their blood sugar at least once daily. Although adequate health literacy was associated with recording of blood sugar testing (p = .049), we found no statistically significant relationship between health literacy and the frequency of SMBG. Persons self-reporting having diabetes for more than 10 years were less likely to self-monitor blood glucose (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11 -0.99).

Conclusions

: SMBG frequency is not independently associated with health literacy, but SMBG result recording is noted among patients with inadequate literacy.

References (0)

Cited by (30)

  • Health literacy research's growth, challenges, and frontiers

    2015, Meeting Health Information Needs Outside of Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges
  • Diabetes self-management in patients with low health literacy: Ordering findings from literature in a health literacy framework

    2012, Patient Education and Counseling
    Citation Excerpt :

    Table 2 summarizes the methodological quality of each paper. The cross-sectional design that most studies applied limits interpretation of the causality between HL, determinants and self-management [18–21,23–27]. Because the beneficial effect of self-management on sociocognitive determinants (e.g. knowledge and self-efficacy) over time is feasible, there could be a reciprocal relationship that can only be evaluated in prospective cohort studies.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text