Time and number discrimination in a bisection task with a sequence of stimuli: A developmental approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00180-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Children, aged 5 and 8 years, and adults were tested in a bisection task with a sequence of stimuli in which time and number co-varied. In a counting and a non-counting condition, they were instructed either to process the duration of this sequence while ignoring the number of stimuli (temporal bisection), or to process the number of stimuli while ignoring the duration (numerical bisection). In the temporal bisection task, number interfered with the 5-year-olds’ temporal performance, indicating that young children did not process time and number independently in a sequence of stimuli when they had to attend to duration. However, number interference decreased both with age and counting strategy. In contrast, in the numerical bisection task, duration did not interfere with numerical discrimination for any age group.

Section snippets

Participants

The final sample consisted of 97 participants: 29 5-year-olds (15 girls and 14 boys; mean age=5.29 years, SD=0.31), 32 8-year-olds (17 girls and 15 boys; mean age=8.05 years, SD=0.28), and 36 adults (28 women and 8 men; mean age=21.84 years, SD=2.72).

Material

A PowerMacintosh computer controlled the experimental events and recorded the data with PsyScope (Cohen, MacWhinney, Flatt, & Provost, 1993). The responses were made using the buttons of a PsyScope response box. The stimulus used was a blue circle

Participants

The sample consisted of 85 participants: 27 5-year-olds (14 girls and 13 boys; mean age = 5.17 years, SD=0.40), 28 8-year-olds (15 girls and 13 boys; mean age = 8.04 years, SD=0.33), and 31 adults (20 women and 11 men; mean age = 22.63 years, SD=2.31).

Material and procedure

The material and the procedure were the same as in experiment 1, except that the participants were instructed to judge the number of stimuli in the signal sequence and to ignore its total duration. The experimenter presented the “short-few” and

General discussion

The results of our two experiments provided additional findings showing that timing and counting are two basic abilities shared by human subjects at different ages, although temporal and numerical sensitivity increased with age (e.g., Droit-Volet, 2002; Droit-Volet et al., 2001; Droit-Volet and Wearden, 2001, Droit-Volet and Wearden, 2002; Whalen, Gallistel, & Gelman, 1999; Xu & Spelke, 2000). However, they also showed that, in children, numerical sensitivity is greater than temporal

References (42)

  • D. Pearson et al.

    Auditory attention switching: A developmental study

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1991)
  • W. Roberts

    Does a common mechanism account for timing and counting phenomena in the pigeon?

  • D. Zakay

    Subjective and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation

  • P. Zelazo et al.

    An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them

    Cognitive Development

    (1996)
  • A. Baddeley

    Human memory: Theory and practice

    (1997)
  • S. Brown

    Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and non-temporal working memory tasks

    Perception & Psychophysics

    (1997)
  • R. Church et al.

    Bisection of temporal intervals

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

    (1977)
  • R. Church et al.

    The numerical attribute of stimuli

  • J. Cohen et al.

    PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers

    Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers

    (1993)
  • S. Dehaene et al.

    Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

    (1995)
  • F. Dempster et al.

    Interference and inhibition in cognition

    (1995)
  • Cited by (84)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text