Elsevier

Injury

Volume 29, Issue 4, May 1998, Pages 277-280
Injury

Long-term physical, psychological and social consequences of a fracture of the ankle

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)80205-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The long-term physical, psychological and social outcomes of 68 patients with an ankle fracture were investigated by using a postal questionnaire 6 years after injury. Patients were treated at a level I Trauma Centre between January 1989 and December 1989. Where applicable, the outcomes were compared with the outcomes of severely injured patients who were investigated previously. Physically, the patients were suffering from problems in the extremities and the spine. Surprisingly, half of them (52 per cent) had psychological complaints due to the initial injury. Eighty-nine per cent of the patients returned to work. This result seems to be only slightly better than the return to work in severely injured patients (74 per cent). Those with an ankle fracture needed less time to return to work (3 months versus 13 months in the severely injured patients). Further social changes (marital status, leisure activities) were mostly found in the severely injured patients. Patients with an ankle fracture as well as severely injured patients are affected by long-term consequences. The differences between the two groups are not as pronounced as is generally assumed. Probably, the consequences of ‘lesser’ injuries are frequently disregarded, whereas severely injured patients are doing better than expected.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (37)

  • Quantifying balance deficit in people with ankle fracture six months after surgical intervention through the Y-Balance test

    2022, Gait and Posture
    Citation Excerpt :

    After the surgical intervention, joint-instability, anatomical misalignment, and residual displacements can lead to biomechanical and functional ankle alterations [4] such as pain, stiffness, reduced joint range of motion (ROM), alteration of soft-tissue, impaired proprioception and muscle weakness, which, in turn, may worsen patients’ balance and gait [5]. The period of disability is usually much longer than the time it takes for the boney structures and connective tissues to heal, as this period of disability is prolonged until years after the surgery [6]. The greater the injury severity, the surgery complexity, and the immobilization time, the more severe and longer-lasting these alterations are, leading to different pathological conditions like osteoarthritis [3].

  • Complications following operative treatment of supination-adduction type II (AO/OTA 44A2.3) ankle fractures

    2020, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    Ankle fractures are amongst the most common orthopaedic injuries, with an incidence of 187 per 100,000 person years [1]. Ankle fractures have risen in frequency over the last several decades and have been shown to cause long-lasting physical, psychological, and social impairment [2,3]. Given the high incidence and significant impact of ankle fractures, a comprehensive understanding of the outcomes and potential complications that may arise from surgical and nonsurgical management strategies is essential.

  • Health status, health-related quality of life, and quality of life following ankle fractures: A systematic review

    2013, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    During this period patients are severely restricted in their activities of daily living. An average of three months work absenteeism is usual.8 However, disabling consequences of AF persist also long after treatment9,10 specifically when internal fixation with osteosynthesis is needed.4–7

  • Outcomes one year after a road accident: Results from the ESPARR cohort

    2013, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    These consequences, however, have rarely been assessed in detail: deaths following road accidents have often been examined, but disability has received much less attention, even though the sequelae may have severe impact on victims and their families. The findings reported in the literature are very disparate (Andersson et al., 1997, 1994; Blanchard et al., 1995; Jeavons, 2000; Jeavons et al., 2000; Stancin et al., 2002; van der Sluis et al., 1998a,b; Yang et al., 2010), but a number of dimensions can be discerned: functional impairment, cognitive disorder, psychological suffering, and quality of life for both victim and family. The rates of functional disability reported following serious accidents vary greatly from study to study.

  • Baseline Predictors of Fatigue 1 Year After Mild Head Injury

    2009, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text