Elsevier

Disease-a-Month

Volume 41, Issue 1, January 1995, Pages 6-71
Disease-a-Month

Health-related quality-of-life assessment in medical care

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-5029(95)90137-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The concept of assessing health-related quality of life has a brief and vibrant history. In this monograph, theoretical issues related to the term and the reasons assessment of quality of life is important are discussed. There is a great deal of ambiguity surrounding definitions of the concept. This equivocation is caused in part by the fact that thinking on both the concept of health-related quality-of-life assessment and the way in which it should be measured are still evolving.

Methodologic concerns regarding the assessment of health-related quality of life are discussed, including ways in which the validity and reliability of measurement approaches are established. These characteristics are important because they are necessary to ensure that accurate information is obtained with whatever instrument or procedure is used. Many significant issues relate to the use of quality-of-life assessment, and these are delineated. Consideration and resolution of these issues are prerequisites to the introduction of a given assessment instrument or procedure into a study.

A large section of this article is devoted to a review of selected measures of health-related quality of life. Three types of measures are discussed. The first type is referred to as general. These measures are designed to be used across different diseases, different treatments or interventions, and different groups of patients. The reliability and validity of general instruments or procedures, plus their history of empirical use, make them invaluable methods of measurement. The second type of measure is referred to as disease specific. These measures are designed to assess specific diagnostic or patient populations with the goal of detecting responsiveness or clinically significant changes. The ability to assess such changes in a particular patient population has led to major growth in the development and introduction of these instruments in the past few years. The final type of measure consists of batteries of separate instruments that are scored independently. The advantage of using this approach is that the battery can be put together to assess whatever aspects of health-related quality of life need to be measured.

Examples of quality-of-life assessment in medical research include a discussion of how various procedures are used to measure the construct with asthma, chronic respiratory disorders, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. All three types of assessment—general, disease specific, and batteries of measures—have been used in this respect. Newer methods of assessment, particularly disease-specific instruments and procedures, are also described. General recommendations are offered to clinicians who may wish to include quality-of-life assessment in their research.

This article concludes with a description of trends observed in quality-of-life assessment. We note that although no single gold-standard measure is apt to emerge for assessing quality of life, some general instruments are gaining wide acceptance. In addition, the proliferation of disease-specific instruments is noted. Finally, we discuss evidence that two trends—linking quality of life to economic indices and to the development of more complex models of assessment—will continue to expand both the arsenal and the application of health-related quality-of-life measures.

Section snippets

A. John McSweeny, PhD, is professor of psychiatry and neurology and director of the Neuropsychology Laboratory at the Medical College of Ohio in Toledo. Before arriving in Ohio in 1981, he held faculty appointments at Northwestern University and West Virginia University. He has conducted research on the neuropsychological and psychosocial aspects of respiratory and neurologic disease for 19 years.

References (144)

  • CookDJ et al.

    Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1993)
  • KinsmanRA et al.

    Subjective symptoms of acute asthma within a heterogeneous sample of asthmatics

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (1973)
  • GanzPA et al.

    Assessing the quality of life in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1990)
  • BergnerM

    Quality of life, health status, and clinical research

    Med Care

    (1989)
  • EngelGE

    The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1980)
  • KaplanRM

    Behavior as the central outcome in health care

    Am Psychol

    (1990)
  • WalkerSR et al.

    Quality of life: assessment and applications

    (1988)
  • CalmanKC

    Quality of life in cancer patients—an hypothesis

    J Med Ethics

    (1984)
  • LevineS et al.

    What constitutes quality of life: a conceptualization of the dimensions of life quality in healthy populations and patients with cardiovascular disease

  • WengerNK et al.

    Preface and overview: assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies

  • SchipperH et al.

    Definitions and conceptual issues

  • WareJE

    Standards for validating health measures: definition and content

    J Chronic Dis

    (1987)
  • KaplanRM et al.

    Applications in AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and arthritis

    Med Care

    (1989)
  • PearlmanRA et al.

    The use of quality-of-life considerations in medical decision making

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1985)
  • WilliamsSJ

    Assessing the consequences of chronic respiratory disease: a critical review

    Int Disabil Stud

    (1989)
  • McCulloughLB

    The concept of quality of life: a philosophical analysis

  • FriesJF et al.

    The hierarchy of patient outcomes

  • SpilkerB

    Introduction

  • McSweenyAJ

    Quality of life assessment in neuropsychology

  • McSweeneyAJ et al.

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  • McSweenyAJ et al.

    Life quality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Arch Intern Med

    (1982)
  • DahlstromWG et al.
  • RadloffLS

    The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population

    Appl Psychol Measure

    (1987)
  • KaplanRM et al.

    Psychosocial issues in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  • YsseldykeJE et al.

    Issues in the psychological evaluation of children

  • PatrickDL et al.

    Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life

    Med Care

    (1989)
  • CreerTL

    Psychological and behavioral assessment of childhood asthma. Part 1: Psychological instruments

    Pediatr Asthma Allergy Immunol

    (1991)
  • BoruchRF et al.

    Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluations

    Prof Psychol

    (1977)
  • McSweenyAJ et al.

    T scores for change: an illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology

    Clin Neuropsychol

    (1993)
  • CookTD et al.

    Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings

    (1979)
  • AndersonJ et al.

    Behavioral environmental assessment and the use of the COPES

  • CostaL

    Clinical neuropsychology: prospects and problems

    Clin Neuropsychol

    (1988)
  • BarofskyI

    Cancer

  • WuAW et al.

    Measuring health status and quality of life in HIV and AIDS

    Psychol Health

    (1992)
  • BergnerM et al.

    Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (1987)
  • KaplanRM

    Quality of life measurement

  • BergnerM

    The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP)

  • Cited by (95)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A. John McSweeny, PhD, is professor of psychiatry and neurology and director of the Neuropsychology Laboratory at the Medical College of Ohio in Toledo. Before arriving in Ohio in 1981, he held faculty appointments at Northwestern University and West Virginia University. He has conducted research on the neuropsychological and psychosocial aspects of respiratory and neurologic disease for 19 years.

    Thomas L. Creer, PhD, is professor and former chair of the Department of Psychology at Ohio University in Athens. He formerly served as director of the Behavioral Science Division and co-executive director of the National Asthma Center in Denver. For 28 years, Dr. Creer has conducted research on psychological factors related to asthma and other chronic respiratory diseases. His current research interests include assessment of asthma-related variables, self-management, and medication compliance.

    View full text