A longitudinal study of primary reaction patterns in children*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X(60)80014-4Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (28)

  • AlpertA. et al.

    Unusual variation in drive endowment

    Psychoanalyt, Study of Child

    (1956)
  • AusubelD.B.
  • BergmanP. et al.

    Unusual sensitivities in very young children

    Psychoanalyt. Study of Child

    (1949)
  • BridgerW.H. et al.

    Psychophysiologic studies of the neonate

    Psychosomat. Med.

    (1959)
  • BruchH.

    Parent education or the illusion of omnipotence

    Am. J. Orthopsychiat.

    (1954)
  • ChessS. et al.

    Characteristics of the individual child's behavioral responses to the environment

    Amer. Jour. Orthopsychiat.

    (1959)
  • EscalonaS. et al.

    Early phases of personality development

    Monograph Soc. Res. Child Develop.

    (1952)
  • EscalonaS.

    Emotional development in the first year of life

  • FriesM. et al.

    Some hypotheses on the role of the congential activity type in personality development

    Psychoanlyt. Study of Child

    (1953)
  • FroschJ. et al.

    A contribution to the nosology of the impulsive disorders

    Am. J. Psychiatr.

    (1954)
  • GesellA. et al.

    Early evidences of individuality in the human infant

    J. Genet. Psychol.

    (1937)
  • GrossmanH.J. et al.

    Psychosomatic differentiation in infancy

    Psychosomat. Med.

    (1957)
  • JacksonE.

    Child development patterns in the United State

  • KlatskinE.H. et al.

    The influence of degreo of flexibility in maternal child care practices on early child behavior

    Am. J. Orthopsychiat.

    (1956)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Exploring an integrative model of infant behavior: What is the relationship among temperament, sensory processing, and neurobehavioral measures?

      2011, Infant Behavior and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Temperament theorists also argue that innate characteristics of the newborn (e.g., sensory response thresholds, soothability, and frequency/duration of a response), may lead to variations in regulation of attention, emotions, and motor reactivity (Lewis, Worobey, & Thomas, 1989). Psychologists have long incorporated sensory reactivity and self-regulation into their constructs of temperament such as the “difficult child” (Bates, 1980; Bates, Freeland, & Lounsbury, 1979; Thomas, Chess, Birch, & Hertzig, 1961) or “inhibited child” (Kagan, Reznick, & Snidman, 1984). Both difficult temperament and behavioral inhibition are linked to an increased risk for later behavioral and emotional problems (Kagan & Snidman, 1999).

    • Parenting and temperament

      2019, Handbook of Parenting: Third Edition
    • The history and theory of behavioral inhibition

      2018, Behavioral Inhibition: Integrating Theory, Research, and Clinical Perspectives
    • The mask of normalcy: Social conformity and its ambiguities

      2017, The Mask of Normalcy: Social Conformity and its Ambiguities
    • Growing pains: A study of teenage distress

      2013, Growing Pains: A Study of Teenage Distress
    • Personality structure and measurement

      2013, Personality Structure and Measurement
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Presented at New York Divisional Meeting of American Psychiatric Association, November 29, 1959. This study was aided in part by grants from The National Institute of Mental Health (M2805) and the Gralnick Foundation.

    View full text