Explicit and implicit memory biases in depression and panic disorder
Introduction
Mood-congruent memory (MCM) has been defined as the tendency to recall information that is consistent with one's mood (Watkins, Mathews, Williamson & Fuller, 1992). Several cognitive theories have accounted well for this bias, as for example, Bower's (1981) spreading activation theory or Beck's (e.g. Kovacs & Beck, 1978) schema approach. However, there are some problems with these theories. Both approaches predict the presence of a MCM bias in all emotional disorders. This bias appears to be a robust finding in depression (for a review, see Blaney, 1986) but, in contrast, anxious patients do not seem to show facilitated recall or recognition memory for threat-related stimuli. Given these discrepancies, Williams, Watts, MacLeod and Mathews (1988) developed an alternative theory of emotional disorders. Following the approach of Mandler (1980), they proposed two stages in the cognitive processing: an automatic, preattentive stage (integration or activation) and a subsequent strategic, postattentive stage (elaboration). Integration or activation refers to the process that serves to strengthen the internal cohesiveness of a mental representation, whereas elaboration involves the formation and strengthening of associations between a mental representation and other existing representations in memory. Anxiety would be associated with the facilitated integrative processing of the threat-related information, but with no equivalent bias in the elaborative processing of such information. In contrast, depression would show the opposite pattern.
Graf and Mandler (1984) discussed the potential relevance of the distinction between integration/activation and elaboration for explicit memory (EM) and implicit memory (IM). Most of investigators agree on the fact that EM performance depends more on the extent of elaboration whereas IM depends more on the extent of integration/activation (Graf & Mandler, 1984). Consequently, Williams et al.'s (1988) theory predicts that anxiety disorders would be characterised by implicit, but no explicit, MCM bias, whereas depressive disorders would be characterised by explicit, but no implicit, MCM bias.
Regarding depression, although it is well established that this disorder is associated with facilitated EM for negative emotional stimuli (e.g. Derry and Kuiper, 1981, Dobson and Shaw, 1987, Mathews and Bradley, 1983), there are controversial results about IM for emotional information. In some studies (Danion et al., 1995, Denny and Hunt, 1992, Hertel and Hardin, 1990, Watkins et al., 1992), depressives showed facilitated EM, but no IM, for negative information. However, other studies (Bradley et al., 1996, Bradley et al., 1994, Bradley et al., 1995, Ruiz-Caballero, 1994, Ruiz-Caballero and González, 1997, Watkins et al., 1996) found that depression was associated with MCM bias in automatic aspects of IM. Nevertheless, only two of the latter studies used clinical populations (Bradley et al., 1995, Bradley et al., 1996).
In contrast to depression, anxiety disorders are rarely associated with enhanced EM for threat-related information (with the exception of Panic Disorder), and research on MCM in anxiety has yielded equivocal results. On the one hand, several studies have found that GAD is characterised by implicit, but no explicit, MCM (e.g. MacLeod and McLaughlin, 1995, Mathews et al., 1989), but others failed to replicate this finding (e.g. Mathews, 1994). Patients with PTSD also seem to exhibit IM bias for combat-related words (Amir, McNally & Wiegartz, 1996). However, social phobics do not seem to show either IM or EM bias (Lundh and Öst, 1997, Rapee et al., 1994), except for the subgroup of nongeneralised social phobics, who did show an IM bias (Lundh & Öst, 1997).
Regarding Panic Disorder (PD), several studies have shown that these patients are characterised by an enhanced conscious recall for threatening material. Furthermore, Becker et al., 1994, Cloitre and Liebowitz, 1991, Lundh et al., 1997, McNally et al., 1989 reported a greater threat-bias in an EM task than in an IM task for PD patients. Cloitre et al., 1994, Amir et al., 1996 reported, however, that PD patients were characterised by both EM and IM biases for threat, although these authors argued that the IM bias effect was not as robust as the EM bias.
On the other hand, MacLeod and McLaughlin (1995) pointed out that the prediction that anxiety and depression will be associated with quite different patterns of IM and EM for emotional stimuli would be most directly addressed if the performance of depressed, anxious and control participants was contrasted within a single experimental study. One of our goals in the present study was to compare implicit and explicit MCM bias in depression and PD, and in doing so we would provide information regarding the contribution for priming and/or elaboration in MCM biases.
We also investigated the content specificity hypothesis in MCM. Thus, four groups of stimuli were included: panic-related words, depression-related words, positive words, and neutral words. We attempted to provide information as to whether the MCM bias relates to the specific disorder relevant information, to all negative information, or to all emotional information.
Furthermore, few studies have included the manipulation of encoding conditions. To our knowledge, only three published papers have investigated to which extent MCM biases depend on similarity of processing activities at encoding and at testing (Eysenck and Byrne, 1994, Richards and French, 1991, Ruiz-Caballero and González, 1997). However, the results of these studies are somehow discrepant the present study we employed three encoding conditions designed to require either data-driven or conceptually-driven processing. The data-driven encoding condition was a ‘counting letters’ task. The conceptually-driven encoding conditions were: (a) a ‘generating’ task in which participants had to generate the appropriate words; and (b) a ‘self-reference’ task in which participants had to imagine a scene involving them and the word.
Summing up, the aims of the present study were to: (a) investigate the contribution of priming and/or elaboration processes to MCM in two emotional disorders: depression and panic disorder; (b) evaluate the cognitive-content specificity assumption in MCM; and (c) investigate the extent to which MCM depends on matching processes at encoding and at testing.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants were: 20 individuals (four men and 16 women) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of Panic Disorder (PD) (eight with agoraphobia and 12 without agoraphobia); 20 individuals (three men and 17 women) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of Major Depression (MD); and 20 Normal Controls (NC) (four men and 16 women) free of psychopathological disorder, and matched for age, sex and educational level with the clinical groups. All patients were referred by clinical psychologists working at the Mental Health
Participant characteristics
The scores obtained by each group on the questionnaires are summarised in Table 1, which also reports the significance group differences. As expected, ANOVAs showed that PD and MD groups reported significantly higher levels of trait anxiety, state anxiety, and depression than the NC group. However, there were no significant group differences in the WAIS scores.
The three groups did not differ in age, sex ratio and years of education. The PD and MD groups did not differ in severity and duration
Discussion
The present study has failed to demonstrate the presence of a MCM bias for disorder-related information in both Panic Disorder and Major Depression. This was the case either when memory was assessed using a direct memory task (EM) or an indirect memory task (IM).
Regarding the EM performance, all participants (depressed, panic and control) recalled more negative emotional words, i.e., more panic and depression-related words, than positive and neutral ones. This result could be suggesting that
References (43)
- et al.
Implicit memory bias for threat in panic disorder: application of the ‘white noise’ paradigm
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1996) - et al.
Implicit memory bias in clinical and nonclinical depression
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1996) - et al.
Implicit and explicit memory for emotional information in nonclinical depression
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1994) - et al.
Implicit and explicit memory for emotion-congruent information in clinical depression and anxiety
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1995) - et al.
Memory bias does not generalize across anxiety disorders
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1995) - et al.
Affective valence of words, explicit and implicit memory in clinical depression
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1995) - et al.
Activation makes word more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1984) - et al.
Explicit and implicit memory bias in social phobia: the role of subdiagnostic type
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1997) - et al.
Explicit and implicit memory bias in panic disorder with agoraphobia
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1997) - et al.
Implicit and explicit memory bias in anxiety: a conceptual replication
Behaviour Research & Therapy
(1995)
Mood and the self-referent bias in recall
Behaviour Research & Therapy
Memory bias in social phobia
Behaviour Research & Therapy
Effects of encoding and anxiety on implicit and explicit memory performance
Personality and Individual Differences
Implicit memory bias for threat in posttraumatic stress disorder
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Depression inventory
Memory bias in panic disorder
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Affect and memory: a review
Psychologist Bulletin
Mood and memory
American Psychologist
Memory bias in panic disorder: an investigation of the cognitive avoidance hypothesis
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Implicit and explicit memory for catastrophic associations to bodily sensation words in panic disorder
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Affective valence and memory in depression: dissociation of recall and fragment completion
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Cited by (45)
Emotional memory in bipolar disorder: Impact of multiple episodes and childhood trauma
2020, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :This is a cross-sectional study that included 53 subjects by convenience - 33 patients with BD type I and 20 healthy controls. This sample is similar to previous studies that investigated emotional memory in patients with mood disorders (Bogie et al., 2019): Baños et al. (2001) included 20 patients with major depressive disorder and 20 controls, Delgado and Chaves (2013) included 19 patients with psychotic manic episodes and 12 in nonpsychotic manic episode, Kauer-Sant‘Anna et al. (2008) included 20 euthymic patients with BD and 20 controls. Patients were included from the Bipolar Disorder Outpatient Clinic (PROTHABI) at the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, in Southern Brazil.
Explicit emotional memory biases in mood disorders: A systematic review
2019, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :For the purposes of this review, stimuli originally defined as “happy” were re-categorized as positive and stimuli originally defined as “depression-related” or “sad” were re-categorized as negative; analyses of any additional valences other than positive, neutral and negative are not discussed (e.g., panic-related (Baños et al., 2001), physically- and socially-threating (Gotlib et al., 2004), social phobia-related (Rinck and Becker, 2005) stimuli). These stimuli were largely included to assess explicit EM in other groups included in these studies (i.e., panic disorder (Baños et al., 2001) and social phobia (Gotlib et al., 2004; Rinck and Becker, 2005) groups). Methodological heterogeneity across the included studies precluded meta-analysis.
A mind full of self: Self-referential processing as a mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of mindfulness training on internalizing disorders
2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsSelf-referential processing in unipolar depression: Distinct roles of subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex
2017, Psychiatry Research - NeuroimagingDoes 'fear of dying' indicate a more severe presentation of panic disorder?
2016, Journal of Anxiety DisordersAge Differences in the Connection of Mood and Cognition: Evidence from Studies of Mood Congruent Effects
2015, Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, Eighth Edition