Bias in interpretation of ambiguous scenarios in eating disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00021-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Eating disorders appear to be associated with biased information processing, particularly in judgments involving the self. This study investigated three possible biases. Patients with anorexia nervosa, patients with bulimia nervosa and female controls completed questionnaires designed to assess interpretation of ambiguous scenarios with either a negative or positive outcome. When events had a negative outcome the patients responded spontaneously to open-ended questions with a weight and shape interpretation. Later, in a forced-choice format, they selected the weight and shape interpretation in preference to interpretations not connected to weight and shape. In both open-ended and forced-choice format this bias was specific to judgements involving the self. When events had a positive outcome the bias was reversed and, in the two formats, it was found only in judgments involving others. In both cases, i.e. for negative self-referent events and for positive other-referent events, patients predicted that weight and shape explanations were more likely. Both groups of patients estimated that negative outcomes involving the self would be more costly. The patients with bulimia nervosa also estimated that positive outcomes involving the self would be more beneficial. Theoretical explanations and clinical implications are discussed.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Mirror exposure therapy for body image disturbances and eating disorders: A review

    2018, Clinical Psychology Review
    Citation Excerpt :

    Appearance related cognitive biases, both attentional and interpretive, have been described in ED (Bauer et al., 2017; Cardi et al., 2017; Cooper, 1997; Glashouwer et al., 2016; Smeets, Jansen, & Roefs, 2011) and BDD (Greenberg et al., 2014). Individuals with ED tend to interpret ambiguous negative situations as being related to their shape or weight (Bauer et al., 2017; Cooper, 1997; Cooper, Cohen-Tovée, Todd, Wells, & Tovée, 1997) and those with BDD interpret negative social cues as relating to their appearance (Buhlmann et al., 2002). Interventions targeting negative interpretation biases have had some success in BDD and AN (Summers & Cougle, 2016; Turton, Cardi, Treasure, & Hirsch, 2018).

  • Body image related negative interpretation bias in anorexia nervosa

    2018, Behaviour Research and Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Alternatively, participants are asked to select one out of several given interpretations or to rate how likely certain interpretations would be. As compared to healthy women, patients with eating disorders were found to more often attribute a negative outcome in such a scenario to negative aspects of their physique and to rate those interpretations as more likely (Cooper, 1997; Williamson, Perrin, Blouin, & Barbin, 2000). These findings suggest that eating disorders are associated with a tendency to interpret ambiguous situations in terms of subjective concerns about body weight and shape.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text