Invited essay
On the scientific status of cognitive appraisal models of anxiety disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00073-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The cognitive paradigm for understanding and treating anxiety disorders comprises two distinct and potentially incompatible approaches: appraisal and information-processing. Advocates of the latter approach have sharply criticized the scientific adequacy of the appraisal models popularized by cognitive therapists. The purpose of this essay is to provide a reappraisal of these critiques of appraisal, and to defend an argument for methodological pluralism.

Section snippets

The appraisal approach

When people refer to “the” cognitive approach to emotional disorders, they usually mean the tradition inaugurated by Beck (1976). Like most psychiatrists of his generation, Beck was trained in psychoanalysis, but soon saw its limitations (Weishaar, 1993). In response to these limitations, Beck articulated a markedly influential theory and therapy for treating depression. Not only has his approach transformed the field of mood disorders, it has likewise revolutionized how people conceptualize

Critique of the appraisal approach

Despite its track record for inspiring effective treatments, the appraisal approach has provoked sharp criticism from other cognitivists. Thus, Lang (1988) argues that it rests on “an inherently limited level of discourse” (p. 221), noting that

It has the force of a good story, and does not ask us to believe in any cognitive mechanism beyond those that have been familiar to playwrights and novelists for centuries. Above all, it can be readily comprehended by the patient, whose cooperation can

Reappraising critiques of appraisal

Critiques issuing from either inside (e.g., MacLeod, 1993) or outside (e.g., Klein & Klein, 1989) the cognitive paradigm have not slowed the appraisal approach, especially in terms of treatment development. Whether therapies based on the cognitive appraisal approach will consistently outperform behavioral and pharmacologic interventions remains an open empirical question. Nevertheless, the appraisal approach has been markedly more therapeutically fruitful than has the information-processing

Conclusions

Taken together, the arguments and counterarguments about self-report, introspection, and appraisal reviewed here strongly indicate that a methodological pluralism is warranted. Sometimes self-reports are just as useless and misleading as the critics charge. But sometimes, depending on one's question, they can be precisely what is needed. If one seeks to divine a patient's beliefs, the patient's self-report is essential. Likewise, certain phenomena, such as obsessions, have no outward

Acknowledgments

This article is based on a Millennium Lecture entitled “Psychological Mechanisms of Anxiety Disorders” delivered at the meeting of the Anxiety Disorders Association of America, March 2000, in Washington DC. I thank Susan A. Clancy for her comments on a previous draft of this article

References (38)

  • A. Wells et al.

    Preliminary tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1999)
  • L.R. Baxter et al.

    Caudate glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • A.T. Beck

    Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders

    (1976)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Anxiety disorders and phobias

    (1885)
  • N. Chomsky

    (Review of the book Verbal behavior)

    Language

    (1959)
  • P.M. Churchland

    Matter and consciousness

    (1988)
  • D.M. Clark et al.

    A comparison of cognitive therapy, applied relaxation and imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • D.M. Clark et al.

    A cognitive model of social phobia

  • K.A. Ericsson et al.

    Verbal reports as data

    Psychological Review

    (1980)
  • Cited by (51)

    • A Theoretical review of cognitive biases and deficits in obsessive–compulsive disorder

      2016, Biological Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, in an important extension of the metacognitive model, Exner, Martin, & Rief (2009) have shown that monitoring one's thoughts are an important cause of memory deficits common in OCD, as we discuss below. Unlike much of the research on dysfunctional beliefs and metacognition, research on cognitive deficits and information-processing biases do not rely on self-report, but rather on behavioral measures such as reaction time and neuropsychological assessment (McNally, 2001). Consequently, this line of research may reveal important etiological information about the disorder that is not readily accessible to patients' awareness.

    • Threat-confirming belief bias and symptoms of anxiety disorders

      2010, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dysfunctional beliefs are assumed to play an important role in the acquisition and persistence of anxiety disorders (e.g., Beck, 1976; McNally, 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text