Elsevier

Behavior Therapy

Volume 30, Issue 3, Autumn 1999, Pages 475-505
Behavior Therapy

Original Research
Treatment of wife abuse: A comparison of gender-specific and conjoint approaches

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(99)80021-5Get rights and content

Seventy-five intact, volunteer couples were assigned to either a gender-specific or a conjoint 14-week group treatment for psychological and physical aggression. Participants from both treatments significantly reduced their psychological and physical aggression, at both posttreatment and 1-year follow-up. During treatment, husbands reduced their psychological aggression by 47%, their moderate physical aggression by 55%, and their severe physical aggression by 51%. Although two-thirds of the husbands maintained cessation of severe aggression during the year following treatment, only one-fourth of the husbands were violence-free. Very similar cessation and maintenance rates were obtained for wives. Significant improvements at posttreatment and follow-up were also found for both spouses' marital adjustment, husbands' taking responsibility for aggression, and wives' depression. No differential effect of treatment type was found, except that, as predicted, husbands in conjoint treatment improved more on marital adjustment. Neither form of treatment was superior to the other in terms of safety and effectiveness for volunteer, intact, and physically aggressive couples.

References (67)

  • CascardiM. et al.

    Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences

    Journal of Family Violence

    (1995)
  • CraneD.R. et al.

    Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1990)
  • CrowellN.A. et al.

    Understanding violence against women

    (1996)
  • EdlesonJ.L. et al.

    Intervention for men who batter: An ecological approach

    (1992)
  • EhrensaftM.K. et al.

    Spouses reasons for not reporting existing marital aggression as a marital problem

    Journal of Family Psychology

    (1996)
  • FaganJ.

    The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits

    (1996)
  • GanleyA.L.

    Court-mandated counseling for men who batter

    (1981)
  • GeffnerR. et al.

    A psychoeducational, conjoint therapy approach to reducing family violence

  • GondolfE.W.

    Batterer programs: What we know and need to know

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (1997)
  • HambergerL.K.

    Group treatment of women who batter their female partners

    In Session

    (1996)
  • HambergerL.K. et al.

    Skills training for treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study

    Journal of Family Violence

    (1988)
  • HambergerL.K. et al.

    Court-mandated treatment of men who batter their partners: Issues, controversies, and outcomes

  • HambergerL.K. et al.

    Proximal cause of spouse abuse: A theoretical analysis for cognitive behavioral interventions

  • HaynesS.N. et al.

    Assessment of marital communication and distress

    Behavioral Assessment

    (1984)
  • HeymanR.E et al.

    Physical aggression couples treatment

  • HeymanR.E. et al.

    Global marital satisfaction vs. marital adjustment: Construct validity and psychometric properties of three measures

    Journal of Family Psychology

    (1994)
  • HeymanR.E. et al.

    Toward a better estimate of the prevalence of partner abuse: Adjusting rates based on the sensitivity of the conflict tactics scale

    Journal of Family Psychology

    (1997)
  • Holtzworth-MunroeA. et al.

    Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1994)
  • Holtzworth-MunroeA. et al.

    Recruiting non-violent men as control subjects for research on marital violence: How easily can it be done?

    Violence and Victims

    (1992)
  • JacobsonN.S. et al.

    Psychological factors in the longitudinal course of battering: When do the couples split up? When does the abuse decrease?

    Violence and Victims

    (1996)
  • JacobsonN.S. et al.

    Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1991)
  • JourilesE.N. et al.

    Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1985)
  • KrokoffL.J.

    Predictive validation of a telephone version of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1989)
  • Cited by (143)

    • Intimate partner violence

      2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3
    • Special Populations: Intimate Partner Violence

      2022, Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Second Edition
    • Examining ACTV: An argument for implementing neuroscience-based and trauma- informed treatment models in offender treatment programs

      2019, Aggression and Violent Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given this statistic, many researchers and clinicians alike believe that conjoint work is the key to eliminating violence without eliminating the relationship. Many of the conjoint treatment models have shown to be as effective, if not slightly more so, than the traditional BIP programs implemented across the United States (McCollum & Stith, 2008; O'Leary, Heyman, & Neidig, 1999). One specific conjoint program that has shown great promise is the Domestic Violence Focused Couples Treatment (DVFCT), which is based on solution-focused therapeutic principles and incorporates elements of mindfulness meditation for self-regulation (Rosen, Matheson, Stith, & McCollum, 2003).

    • Digital Interventions for Couples: State of the Field and Future Directions

      2021, Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text