The efficacy of response cost procedures for reducing children's noncompliance to parental instructions*
References (16)
- et al.
Direct and collateral effects of positive reinforcement, response cost, and mixed contingencies for academic performance
Journal of School Psychology
(1978) - et al.
Parents' acceptance of reductive treatment methods: The influence of problem severity and perception of child behavior
Behavior Therapy
(1986) - et al.
Mothers' acceptance of behavioral interventions for children: The influence of parent race and income
Behavior Therapy
(1987) - et al.
Comparative effects of externally managed and self-managed response-cost systems on inappropriate classroom behavior
Journal of School Psychology
(1985) - et al.
Teaching children appropriate shopping behavior through parent training in the supermarket setting
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
(1977) - et al.
A parent advice package for family shopping trips: Development and evaluation
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
(1977) - et al.
Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions
Journal of School Psychology
(1984) - et al.
Assessment of child behavior problems: The validation of a new inventory
Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
(1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (12)
Noncompliant behavior of people with mental retardation
1993, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesAssessing Specific Discipline Techniques: A Mixed-Methods Approach
2014, Journal of Child and Family StudiesIncreasing classroom compliance: Using a high-probability command sequence with noncompliant students
2012, Journal of Behavioral EducationDecreasing work refusals in an adult with intellectual disability
2010, Clinical Case StudiesBehavior change in the human services: Behavioral and cognitive principles and applications
2005, Behavior Change in the Human Services: Behavioral and Cognitive Principles and Applications
- *
This article is based on a thesis submitted by Linda M. Little to the Department of Psychology,Louisiana State University. We are deeply grateful to Diane Franz for her dedication and assistance in data collection. All treatment materials, including handouts are available from the second author upon request.
Copyright © 1989 Published by Elsevier Ltd.