Acceptability of time out from reinforcement procedures for disruptive child behavior*
References (28)
- et al.
Time-limited desensitisation, implosion and shaping for phobic patients: A crossover study
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1972) - et al.
Restitution: A method of eliminating aggressive-disruptive behavior of retarded and brain damaged patients
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1972) - et al.
Important parameters in the use of timeout with children: A re-examination
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1977) - et al.
Behavioral intervention with hyperactive children: Group consequences as a supplement to individual contingencies
Behavior Therapy
(1975) - et al.
A classroom timeout procedure for retarded children
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1976) - et al.
Required relaxation: A method of inhibiting agitative-disruptive behavior of retardates
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1973) - et al.
An experimental analysis of children's preference for self-selected rewards
- et al.
Behavior modification and the law: implications of recent judicial decisions
Journal of Psychiatry and Law
(1976) - et al.
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix
Psychological Bulletin
(1959) - et al.
Sociometric and disruptive behavior as a function of four types of token reinforcement programs
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
(1974)
The timeout ribbon: A nonexclusionary timeont procedure
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Research problems in clinical diagnosis
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Characteristics and trends in applied behavior analysis
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Behavior modification in applied settings
Cited by (152)
Longitudinal impact of the Second Step Child Protection Unit on teacher knowledge, attitude, and climate
2021, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :It also examined whether prior reporting experience and perceptions of treatment acceptability were related to these outcomes. Treatment acceptability, or extent to which an intervention is perceived as reasonable, appropriate, and fair (Kazdin, 1980), increases the likelihood of implementing an intervention as intended (Albers, Elliott, Kettler, & Roach, 2013). Despite the importance of assessing acceptability, especially with a topic as sensitive as sexual abuse, this is often not included in intervention studies (Villarreal, Ponce, & Gutierrez, 2015).
Treatment of Severe Behavior Disorders
2015, Clinical and Organizational Applications of Applied Behavior AnalysisWhat Latina Mothers Think of Evidence-Based Parenting Practices: A Qualitative Study of Treatment Acceptability
2013, Cognitive and Behavioral PracticeCitation Excerpt :Most mothers found parent-child playtime acceptable as well. These findings are consistent with past studies that have found high levels of self-reported use of praise and playtime among Latina mothers of preschoolers (Calzada & Eyberg, 2002), and high acceptance of positive parenting practices among parents more generally (Jones et al., 1998; Kazdin, 1980a, 1980b). It has been suggested that the Latino value of respeto (i.e., an emphasis on respect that calls for unquestioning obedience and deference to adults/elders) may be incongruous with the use of positive reinforcement (Calzada, 2010).
Prem Baby Triple P a new parenting intervention for parents of infants born very preterm: Acceptability and barriers
2011, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :In order to achieve this, parents of infants born at term were also recruited as a comparison group. In this context, acceptability is defined as the parental belief of whether an intervention is appropriate for them and their child and whether the program meets their expectations of what it should involve (Kazdin, 1980). In other words, it refers to cognitions about the intervention's suitability before the treatment has actually been obtained.
Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the Good Behavior Game with kindergarten students
2010, Journal of School Psychology
- *
Completion of this research was facilitated by Grant MH31047 from the National Institute of Mental Health