Elsevier

Behavior Therapy

Volume 34, Issue 1, Winter 2003, Pages 1-15
Behavior Therapy

Original Research
Psychometric properties of the sutter-eyberg student behavior inventory-revised with preschool children*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(03)80018-7Get rights and content

This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a revised teacher rating scale of disruptive behavior with preschool-aged children. The Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised (SESBI-R) was completed by teachers of 74 nonreferred preschoolers and 49 children referred for evaluation of behavior problems, age 3 to 6. Results of the study demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, testrestest stability, and inter-teacher agreement, as well as the absence of systematic bias in scores over repeated administration. Analyses also showed no differences in SESBI-R scores by children's age, gender, or ethnicity. Evidence of convergent, discriminant, incremental, and discriminative validity was demonstrated, in addition to criterion validity for the factor scores of the SESBI-R. The results of this study suggest that the SESBI-R is a promising instrument for measuring classroom behavior problems in preschoolers.

References (25)

  • FergussonD.M. et al.

    Prevalence and comorbidity of DSM-III-R diagnoses in a birth cohort of 15 year olds

    Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • WolraichM.L. et al.

    Comparison of diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a countywide sample

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • AchenbachT.M.

    Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2–3 and 1992 Profile

    (1992)
  • AchenbachT. et al.

    Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1987)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1987)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • BarkleyR.

    Child behavior rating scales and checklists

  • BeharL.

    The Preschool Behavior Questionnaire

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1977)
  • BeidermanJ. et al.

    Comorbidity of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder with conduct, depressive, anxiety, and other disorders

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • CampbellS.B. et al.

    Follow-up of hard to manage preschoolers: Adjustment at age 9 and predictors of continuing symptoms

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • CohenJ. et al.

    Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral science

    (1983)
  • ConnersC.K. et al.

    Revision and restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1998)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Outcomes of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) for families presenting with child maltreatment: A systematic review

      2022, Child Abuse and Neglect
      Citation Excerpt :

      There were two RCTs (Chaffin et al., 2004; Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2011) and one case study (Warren et al., 2021) that utilized psychometric measures that did not rely on parent/caregiver self-report. Warren et al. (2021) used the Teacher Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 2009) and Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck (2011) used the TRF and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory (SESBI; Querido & Eyberg, 2003). Both of these measures parallel the caregiver versions of the CBCL and ECBI, and are completed by the child's teacher or educator.

    • Universal Teacher-Child Interaction Training in Early Special Education: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Control Trial

      2021, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Problem scale assesses the teacher’s perception of the behavior as being problematic, rated as either yes or no. Each scale yields a total raw score, converted to normed T scores with scores ≥ 60 indicating clinically significant behavior concerns. The SESBI-R has demonstrated high test–retest reliability and sensitivity to changes over the course of treatment, in addition to high discriminant and predictive validity (Querido & Eyberg, 2003). Internal consistency for Intensity items in the current sample was high (baseline α = .96, post α = .97, follow-up α = .97).

    • Teleconsultation: The use of technology to improve evidence-based practices in rural communities

      2016, Journal of School Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Sutter–Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory — Revised was used as a descriptive measure of student behavior prior to beginning the study. It has been found to have high internal consistency (Intensity scale .98, Problem scale .96; Rayfield, Eyberg, & Foote, 1998) and strong content and construct validity (Querido & Eyberg, 2003). The inventory contains two scales, an Intensity scale and a Problem Scale.

    • Teacher-Child Interaction Training: A Pilot Study With Random Assignment

      2015, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the Problem Scale, they rate yes or no if they consider the frequency of the behavior to be problematic. One-week test-retest reliability coefficients were .81 for the Intensity Scale and .84 for the Problem Scale in a sample of 3- to 6-year-old children (Querido & Eyberg, 2003). Internal consistency for the Intensity and Problem scales at baseline in this study was .98 and .95, respectively.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    This work was supported by the grant 99F-0110 from the Children's Miracle Network awarded to Jane Querido.

    View full text