ArticleInterrater reliability of neurologic soft signs in an acquired brain injury population☆
References (15)
- et al.
Neurological soft signs in chronic schizophrenic patients: clinical correlates
Biol Psychiatry
(1988) - et al.
The Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES): a structured instrument for the assessment of neurological signs in schizophrenia
Psychiatry Res
(1989) - et al.
Reliability of subtle (soft) neurological signs in children
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1989) - et al.
Neurological soft signs in neuroleptic-naive and neuroleptic-treated schizophrenic patients and in normal comparison subjects
Am J Psychiatry
(1995) - et al.
Schizophrenia with good and poor outcome III: neurological “soft” signs, cognitive impairment and their clinical significance
Br J Psychiatry
(1985) - et al.
Neurologic soft signs in schizophrenia and character disorders
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(1976) - et al.
The clinical correlates of neurological soft signs in chronic schizophrenia
Br J Psychiatry
(1991)
Cited by (11)
Validity of Clinically Derived Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index
2010, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :The limitation of the study is that the reliability of the Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index was not tested directly in this study. However, the individual tests that comprised the Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index have been extensively tested for their reliability and are widely used in clinical settings.31-33 Available evidence suggests that age- or disease-related impairment in different somatosensory modalities does not occur in parallel.10-12
Two-point discrimination following traumatic brain injury
2005, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceAnalyses of gait, reaching, and grasping in children after traumatic brain injury
2003, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationReliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with transtibial amputation
2002, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :The ICC provides a measure for evaluating reliability because it takes into account both the between- and within-subjects components of variance as well as the heterogeneity of the sample.9 Values greater than.60 are considered acceptable reliability.10 We examined the consistency of the test over time by repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the difference over the 2 days and between therapists.
Discharge criteria from perioperative physical therapy
2002, ChestCitation Excerpt :In addition, we considered the agreement between the therapist's global assessment of readiness for discharge from PT and the decision based on the POP-DST using Cohen's κ statistic.111314 The κ statistic measures agreement based on dichotomous variables.κ values of > 0.75 are considered to be representative of excellent reproducibility, while those ranging from 0.40 to 0.74 are thought to reflect good reproducibility,14 depending on the type of measure evaluated and the expertise of the raters.12 For the follow-up study, we determined the percentage of subjects who developed respiratory complications who were amenable to PT intervention following discharge from PT.
Pilot study of neurological soft signs and depressive and postconcussive symptoms during recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
2015, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
- ☆
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.