Value of the cardiovascular physical examination for detecting valvular heart disease in asymptomatic subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00200-7Get rights and content

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of the cardiovascular physical examination for the diagnosis of asymptomatic valvular heart disease (VHD), we prospectively studied 143 subjects, 68 apparent normal subjects and 75 patients with diseases known to produce VHD. All subjects underwent a complete physical examination with dynamic cardiac auscultation by a physician blinded to clinical data and compared with the results of transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography (TEE). By TEE, 33 subjects (23%), and by physical examination, 25 subjects (17%) had at least 1 form of VHD. Despite a high frequency of mild valve abnormalities and a 31% prevalence of functional murmurs, the physical examination showed a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 98% (confidence interval = 0.51 to 0.84, and 0.94 to 0.99, respectively), and a positive and negative predictive value of 92% for the diagnosis of VHD. Only 2 of the 10 patients with VHD by TEE, but not by physical examination, had clinically important VHD. We conclude that the physical examination is a sensitive and highly specific method of screening for VHD in subjects without cardiac symptoms. Therefore, its use should be encouraged rather than the routine application of echocardiography.

References (26)

  • AE Weyman et al.

    Cross-sectional echocardiographic visualization of the stenotic pulmonary valve

    Circulation

    (1977)
  • J Tunon et al.

    Assessment of chronic tricuspid regurgitation by color Doppler echocardiography: a comparison with angiography in the catheterization room

    Eur Heart J

    (1994)
  • PJ Currie et al.

    Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients

    Circulation

    (1985)
  • Cited by (118)

    • Utility of physical examination and comparison to echocardiography for cardiac diagnosis

      2017, Indian Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      For patient with combined AS and AR, there was substantial agreement for detection of both AS (κ = 0.626; CI = 0.352–0.9) and AR (κ = 0.781; CI = 0.544–1.018). Stenotic and regurgitant valvular lesions, when sorted according to disease severity on echocardiography and audibility of respective associated murmur on clinical examination, it became apparent that diagnosis is much more likely to be missed on physical examination in mild valvular lesions compared to moderate to severe valvular lesions (Table 3).13 Almost perfect agreement was found between clinical and echocardiographic detection for VSD (κ = 0.872; CI = 0.73–1.01) while substantial agreement noted for detection of PS (κ = 0.647; CI = 0.33–0.97) and ASD (κ = 0.646; CI = 0.32–0.97) (Table 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text