Factors Associated with Adherence to the Dietary Protein Intervention in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study
Section snippets
Methods
The MDRD Study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to test the effect of three levels of protein and phosphorus intake and two levels of blood pressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease. Participants were 840 adults with renal diseases of diverse etiology who were not on dialysis and had not had a kidney transplant.
Participants were assigned to one of two studies on the basis of baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a measure of renal function. In Study
Results
Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 compare selected characteristics and factors of adherers and nonadherers in each diet group. These tables include only those variables that were significantly different between adherers and nonadherers in two or more diet groups, or variables that may have clinical implications, such as GFR and mean arterial pressure. Nonsignificant findings of interest will be discussed but not, reported in the tables.
Table 2 reports the EPI and dietary protein intake for the
Discussion
To our knowledge, the data presented in this article are unique. Unlike previous studies that have examined the effects of a low-protein diet in similar populations (16), we reported the factors related to dietary adherence. We also defined adherence in an unusually stringent fashion, that is, as being in range for both dietary protein intake and urinary urea nitrogen excretion for at least four of six adherence visits over a 2-year period. These stringent criteria allowed us to examine the
Applications
The MDRD Study nutrition intervention program was well received by participants, and the program has many components that could be adapted to clinical practice. Self-management strategies were used with great success, which provides an impetus to incorporate these strategies in practice.
Recording foods and their protein content enabled participants to monitor their own success and promoted self-efficacy. Self-monitoring can be easily incorporated into clinical settings. Nutrient counters are
References (17)
- et al.
Applying behavioral methods to nutritional counseling
J Am Diet Assoc.
(1978) Hemodialysis patients and dietary abuse
Psychosomalics.
(1978)- et al.
for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. Nutrition intervention program of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Studya self-management approach
J Am Diet Assoc.
(1995) - et al.
for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease StudyDietary satisfaction correlated with adherence in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study
J Am Diet Assoc.
(1995) - et al.
for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease StudyRegistered dietitian time requirements in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study
J Am Diet Assoc.
(1995) - et al.
A method for estimating nitrogen intake of patients with chronic renal failure
Kidney Int.
(1985) - et al.
for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. The production of quality dietary dataa collaborative effort of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study
J Renal Nutr.
(1992) - et al.
Self-monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control
Behav Ther.
(1993)
Cited by (80)
Nutrition Management for Chronic Kidney Disease: Differences and Special Needs for Children and Adults
2023, Seminars in NephrologyNutrition Counseling for Hypertension Within a Grocery Store: An Example of the Patient-Centered Medical Neighborhood Model
2019, Journal of Nutrition Education and BehaviorAttitudes and beliefs that affect adherence to provider-based complementary and alternative medicine: A systematic review
2018, European Journal of Integrative MedicineCitation Excerpt :The two features specific to cognitive behavioural therapy were the assumption of how a person thinks affects the way he or she behaves and teaching him or her to manage dysfunctional thinking [26]. Furthermore, adherence with therapy was positively associated with usefulness of therapist support [24], and satisfaction with the quality of the trainer [23]. van Berkel et al. [23] mentioned that the trainer-participant relationship appeared to be a determinant for adherence and suggested future research explore ways to enhance the compatibility between patient and practitioner.
Nutrition intervention: Lessons from clinical trials
2017, Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease