Elsevier

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volume 28, August 2019, Pages 229-237
Current Opinion in Psychology

Behavioral assessment of mindfulness: defining features, organizing framework, and review of emerging methods

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Rigorous behavioral measures of mindfulness are critical to mindfulness science.

  • We propose key defining features of behavioral measures of mindfulness.

  • We propose four domains of behavioral assessment of mindfulness.

  • We describe mindfulness processes, behavioral methods, and measures per domain.

  • Four behavioral mindfulness measures demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties.

The development and implementation of psychometrically sound behavioral measures of mindfulness are important to advancing the science of mindfulness. To help organize, conceptualize, and guide the development of behavioral measures of mindfulness, we propose defining features, and a four-domain framework, of the behavioral assessment of mindfulness. The framework domains include measurement of (I) objects of mindful awareness, (II) time-course of mindful awareness, (III) sensitivity of mindful awareness, and (IV) attitudes toward present moment experience. We describe mindfulness processes in each domain, and review extant behavioral method(s) and specific behavioral measure(s) of mindfulness processes per domain. Four of the 12 reviewed measures demonstrate acceptable reliabilities and preliminary evidence of construct validity as measures of mindfulness processes.

Introduction

In recent years there has been a rapid growth of interest in and study of mindfulness [1]. To facilitate this science, measurement methods of mindfulness have been developed and implemented widely, most commonly self-report scales of mindfulness [1,2,3]. However, reliance on self-report scales to measure mindfulness is limited in a number of fundamental and well-established ways (see Refs. [1,4, 5, 6] for reviews). Consequently, responding to calls for advancing mindfulness measurement and thereby the science of mindfulness [1,2,3,7], a number of research groups have developed and tested novel behavioral measures of mindfulness.

To-date, behavioral measures of mindfulness have emerged, organically so to speak, through creative efforts of various research groups. There are, however, no established defining features of behavioral measures of mindfulness to help guide such work. Likewise, there is no organizing framework or proposed set of principles to conceptually or methodologically organize this work to-date, nor to systematically guide the ongoing development of novel measurement methods. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose defining features of behavioral measures of mindfulness, lay out a novel organizing framework for such measures, and review extant behavioral methods and measures of mindfulness.

We argue that behavioral measures of mindfulness are characterized by two essential and defining features. First, behavioral measures of mindfulness are designed to measure attention of, awareness of, or an attitude(s) toward, present moment experience(s). Second, experimental stimuli in behavioral measures of mindfulness are present moment experiential objects of mindful awareness common to mindfulness training (e.g. breath, interoception, mental events; c.f., numbers, words, or arrows on a computer screen). Such defining features may help to conceptualize and specify behavioral assessment of mindfulness, and may guide the development of novel behavioral measures of mindfulness. Such features may also help to distinguish behavioral measures of mindfulness from long-standing cognitive tasks, such as those measuring external attention (typically visual attention) or executive functions (e.g. working memory) that have to-date been the primary behavioral measures of outcomes, or putative cognitive proxies, of mindfulness [8, 9, 10].

We propose a framework consisting of four domains that may further help to organize, conceptualize, and guide the development of extant and emerging behavioral measures of mindfulness. Each domain entails one or more behavioral method(s) and measure(s) designed to assess a group of inter-related mindfulness processes (see Table 1). The domains include measurement of (I) objects of mindful awareness, (II) time-course of mindful awareness, (III) sensitivity of mindful awareness, as well as (IV) attitudes toward present moment experience (see Figure 1). Below, we describe the mindfulness process(es), behavioral method(s), and measure(s) included in each domain.

Section snippets

Domain I. Measuring the objects of mindful awareness

Mindfulness involves awareness of various present moment experiences or objects. Indeed, canonical Buddhist texts delineate four foundations of mindfulness, three of which refer to experiential objects of mindful awareness — body, hedonic tone, and mind [11,12]. Likewise, the objects of mindful awareness are also central to many forms of mindfulness meditation. For example, focused Attention (FA) meditation involves focusing mindful awareness on a meditation anchor, an object such as the breath

Domain II. Measuring the time-course of mindful awareness

As a process that unfolds from moment-to-moment in time, mindfulness practice entails sustaining mindful awareness on present moment experience and re-engaging in mindful awareness once mindless states occur (i.e. states with no awareness of present moment experience) [11,12]. We refer to the expression of mindful awareness in time as the time-course of mindful awareness. Indeed, Buddhist scholars and mindfulness researchers have previously referred to at least two important mindfulness

Domain III. Measuring the sensitivity of mindful awareness

Various Buddhist canonical texts and contemporary Buddhist and secular mindfulness traditions emphasize the importance of developing mindful awareness of subtle experiences in the body and mind, such as subtle sensations throughout the body [28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. Accordingly, accurate detection of subtle changes in interoceptive and mental experience is an important mindfulness process. In line with recent conceptualizations of interoceptive sensitivity as accuracy in detection of internal

Domain IV. Measuring the attitudes toward present moment experience

Mindfulness practice is characterized by a particular relationship with, or attitudes toward, present moment experience, such as non-judging, acceptance, curiosity, and disidentification from experience [22,24,32,51, 52, 53]. Collectively, these attitudes toward present moment experience are often referred to as attitudinal qualities of mindfulness, and are considered foundational to the practice and cultivation of mindfulness [24,32,53].

To-date, only one behavioral method has been used to

Conclusions

We proposed two defining features of behavioral measures of mindfulness as well as a framework to help organize, conceptualize, and guide the development of extant and emerging behavioral measures of mindfulness (see Table 1). Of the 12 reviewed measures, four demonstrate acceptable reliabilities and preliminary evidence of construct validity as measures of mindfulness processes: Mindful-Breathing Exercise [16], Mindful Awareness Task, Breath Counting Task [26••], and the Single Experience and

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 2046/17) and a Mind and Life Institute Francisco J. Varela Research Award (grant no. 2015-Varela-Hadash, Yuval).

References (57)

  • S. Sauer et al.

    Assessment of mindfulness: review on state of the art

    Mindfulness

    (2013)
  • R.J. Davidson et al.

    Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation

    Am Psychol

    (2015)
  • P. Grossman

    On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research

    J Psychosom Res

    (2008)
  • P. Grossman et al.

    Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science

    Contemp Buddhism

    (2011)
  • E. Garland et al.

    Envisioning a future contemplative science of mindfulness: fruitful methods and new content for the next wave of research

    Complement Health Pract Rev

    (2009)
  • D.R. Vago et al.

    Measuring cognitive outcomes in mindfulness-based intervention research: a reflection on confounding factors and methodological limitations

    Curr Opin Psychol

    (2019)
  • N. Thera

    The Heart of Buddhist Meditation: The Buddha’s Way of Mindfulness

    (2014)
  • A. Lutz et al.

    Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2008)
  • J.M. Burg et al.

    The healthy quality of mindful breathing: associations with rumination and depression

    Cognit Ther Res

    (2011)
  • H.J. Scheibner et al.

    Behavioral assessment of mindfulness difficulties in borderline personality disorder

    Mindfulness

    (2016)
  • P.A. Frewen et al.

    Meditation Breath attention Scores (MBAS): test-retest reliability and sensitivity to repeated practice

    Mindfulness

    (2014)
  • P. Frewen et al.

    Meditation Breath attention Scores (MBAS): development and investigation of an internet-based assessment of focused attention during meditation practice

    Psychol Assess

    (2016)
  • J.M. Burg et al.

    Mindfulness as self-regulated attention: associations with heart rate variability

    Swiss J Psychol

    (2012)
  • P. Frewen et al.

    Assessment of response to mindfulness meditation: meditation breath attention scores in association with subjective measures of state and trait mindfulness and difficulty letting go of depressive cognition

    Mindfulness

    (2011)
  • S.R. Bishop et al.

    Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition

    Clin Psychol Sci Pract

    (2004)
  • J. Kabat-Zinn

    Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future

    Clin Psychol Sci Pract

    (2003)
  • S.L. Shapiro et al.

    Mechanisms of mindfulness

    J Clin Psychol

    (2006)
  • K.W. Brown et al.

    Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects

    Psychol Inq

    (2007)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them

      2023, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such instruments could reflect both laboratory-based behavioral tasks and more ecologically valid measures of behavior performance. Researchers have developed laboratory-based instruments to measure aspects of mindfulness (see Hadash & Bernstein, 2019), and these tasks could perhaps be used or altered to measure some ACT processes. For example, a task developed by Hadash et al. (2016) may provide a starting point for a laboratory-based self-as-context instrument.

    • First, do no harm: An intensive experience sampling study of adverse effects to mindfulness training

      2021, Behaviour Research and Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, due to the impact of mindfulness training on meta-awareness, observed sustained adverse responding in daily living at post-intervention may in part be a function of greater awareness of internal states rather than objective deterioration in these internal states. Future study of adverse effects may be a particularly important domain for other-observer, clinician ratings, or performance-based behavioral or cognitive measurement methods (Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015; Grossman, 2019; Hadash & Bernstein, 2019). We thank Ravit Oren, David Spivak, Pavel Goldstein, Galia Tanay, Yuval Hadash and Reut Plonsker, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, for their assistance in carrying out the reported study.

    • Mindful meta-awareness: sustained and non-propositional

      2019, Current Opinion in Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The particular case of ‘mental quiescence’ or śamatha practice in Tibetan Mahāmudrā illustrates the need for a revision to widespread notions of meta-awareness as propositional and intermittent. Given the impact that nondual styles of practice such as Mahāmudrā have had on MBSR, meta-awareness in MBSR (and broadly in contemporary mindfulness) is not adequately characterized as intermittent and propositional—an insight already suggested by several recent publications [11,13–15,34–36,38,39]. Motivated by this work and by the key role that meta-awareness plays in the therapeutic effects of mindfulness, we have thus proposed a construct of ‘mindful meta-awareness’ as non-propositional and sustained.

    • Metacognitive processes model of decentering: emerging methods and insights

      2019, Current Opinion in Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consistent with the metacognitive processes model, findings suggest that accurate meta-awareness effects attentional regulation, and important processes related to mental health. A third approach to measure and study meta-awareness is implemented in the Mindful Awareness Task — a behavioral measure of meta-awareness during mindfulness meditation (see Hadash and Bernstein in this issue for details) [28]. In the MAT participants provide real-time self-caught reports (behavioral markers) of their meta-awareness during mindfulness meditation, by verbally stating a label describing each experience they notice (e.g. ‘hearing’, ‘thinking’) and by pressing a button when they notice their inhalation and exhalation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text