Social Anxiety

Social Anxiety (Third Edition)

Clinical, Developmental, and Social Perspectives
2014, Pages 483-510
Social Anxiety

Chapter 16 - Cognitive Biases in Social Anxiety Disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394427-6.00016-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Psychopathologists have been greatly influenced by information-processing models of emotional disorders that suggest preferential processing of threat-relevant information underlie these disorders. Meta-analyses now show that information-processing biases do characterize anxious individuals. More specifically, anxious individuals preferentially attend to threat-relevant information as well as interpreting ambiguous information as threatening. There is also some evidence that there is preferential memory for social information in socially anxious individuals. By far the majority of this research has examined the correlational nature of these cognitive biases and anxiety. However, since the second edition of this book, accumulating evidence suggests that such biases may play a causal role in the development and maintenance of social anxiety disorders. In previous editions, we introduced the concept of experimental approaches to modifying information-processing biases and presented preliminary evidence suggesting the utility of these interventions. Since the last edition of this chapter, the field has witnessed a surge of interest in the modification of cognitive biases in social anxiety. This research has largely focused on attentional bias modification, although research is beginning to accumulate examining the efficacy of interpretation bias modification in reducing social anxiety symptoms. Together these studies suggest that information-processing biases may be causally implicated in social anxiety. Relative to attention and interpretation, research on memory biases in social anxiety lags behind. In this chapter, we summarize the evidence for information-processing biases that may characterize socially anxious individuals. For each domain, we provide a review of the literature and suggest areas of future research.

References (0)

Cited by (14)

  • Scary in the eye of the beholder: Attentional bias and attentional retraining for social anxiety

    2023, Journal of Psychiatric Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The vigilance-avoidance hypothesis presumes that socially anxious people show early alertness and later avoidance of threatening cues (Dong et al., 2020). Our findings also support previous research reporting that attentional bias for socially threatening stimuli is characteristic of individuals with elevated levels of social anxiety (Boal et al., 2018; Heeren, Peschard, et al., 2012a; Kuckertz and Amir, 2014; Schmidtendorf et al., 2018). Previous researchers have used various attentional retraining techniques to help people with social anxiety overcome their anxiety by gaining more control over their bias (Carleton et al., 2015; Clarke et al., 2017; De Voogd et al., 2014; Heeren et al., 2016; Heeren, Reese, et al., 2012b; Kuckertz et al., 2019; Liang and Hsu, 2016; Naim et al., 2018).

  • Keep your (social) distance: Pathogen concerns and social perception in the time of COVID-19

    2020, Personality and Individual Differences
    Citation Excerpt :

    At the behavioral level, individuals with SAD tend to be avoidant of social interactions such as meeting unfamiliar people, being observed, and performing in front of others (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Previous studies showed that individuals with SAD may have selective information-processing biases for threat-related information, and that they also tend to interpret ambiguous information as threatening (Kuckertz & Amir, 2014). Furthermore, there are indications that individuals with SAD are characterized by intolerance of uncertainty (Boelen & Reijntjes, 2009; Lange, Allart, Keijsers, Rinck, & Becker, 2012).

  • Biased estimations of interpersonal distance in non-clinical social anxiety

    2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    Individuals with social anxiety are characterized by avoidance of social interactions, manifested by a preference for greater interpersonal distance – specifically from strangers (Asnaani, Rinck, Becker, & Hofmann, 2014; Perry, Rubinsten, Peled, & Shamay-Tsoory, 2013; Cohen, Perry, Mayseless, Kleinmintz, & Shamay-Tsoory, 2018; Clark & Wells, 1995). There is also evidence that social anxiety is accompanied by cognitive symptoms, including biases in attention (Bantin, Stevens, Gerlach, & Hermann, 2016; see review by Kuckertz & Amir, 2014), interpretation (Mobini, Reynolds, & Mackintosh, 2013; Spokas, Rodebaugh, & Heimberg, 2007), memory (Amir & Bomyea, 2011; Clark & Wells, 1995; Rapee & Heimberg, 1997; Yoon, Kutz, LeMoult, & Joormann, 2017;) and imagery (Ng, Abbott, & Hunt, 2014; (Brozovich & Heimberg, 2013; see review: Norton & Abbott, 2016). In a related vein, there is also evidence that individuals with social anxiety show biased estimations of social elements.

  • Using model fish to study the biological mechanisms of cooperative behaviour: A future for translational research concerning social anxiety disorders?

    2018, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    In relation to the overall assessment of social environments, it has been proposed that SAD patients develop a dysfuctional stimulus-outcome expectancy, tending to focus on other people's evaluations of the patient's appearance, behaviour, and other self-identifying traits (Trower and Gilbert, 1989). Regarding the role of memory in SAD, there is intermittent evidence for memory biases for social threat-relevant information (Kuckertz and Amir, 2014). Deficits in attachment behaviour are not observed in SAD patients, which is a clear clinical distinction between SAD and autism or schizoid patients with social anxiety disorder; in this sense, the absence of changes in attachment when other distinctions arise, could represent a “negative control” in putative models.

  • Cognitive bias modification

    2017, The Science of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text