Original article
Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—I: Measurement strategies

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90039-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Values play a critical part in decision making at both the individual and policy levels. Numerous methodologies for determining the preferences of individuals and groups have been proposed, but agreement has not been reached regarding their scientific adequacy and feasibility. This is the first of a four-part series of papers that analyzes and critiques the state-of-the-art in measuring preferences, particularly the measurement of health-state preferences. In this first paper we discuss the selection of relevant attributes to comprise the health-state descriptions, and the relative merits of three measurement strategies: holistic, explicitly decomposed, and statistically inferred decomposed. The functional measurement approach, a statistically inferred decomposed strategy, is recommended because it simultaneously validates the process by which judges combine attributes, the scale values they assign to health states, and the interval property of the scale.

References (26)

  • C.T. Veit et al.

    Measuring health and healthcare outcomes: issues and recommendations

  • G.W. Fischer

    Utility models for multiple objective decisions: do they accurately represent human preferences?

    Decis Sci

    (1979)
  • C.T. Veit et al.

    Effects of physical and mental health on health-state preferences

    Med Care

    (1982)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text