Elsevier

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Volume 6, Issue 4, October–December 1992, Pages 295-303
Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Research papers
Selective attention toward physical threat in patients with panic disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(92)90001-NGet rights and content

Abstract

Recent research has indicated that panic disorder patients may exhibit a cognitive bias to attend selectively to stimuli that pertain to physical threat. The present study attempted to investigate this phenomenon using a direct assessment of attentive behaviour. Eighteen panic disorder patients and 18 control subjects were tested in a visual attention paradigm developed by MacLeod et al. This paradigm allowed for the assessment of the allocation of visual attention to words related either to physical or social threat, via the measurement of detection latencies for visual probes that appeared following presentations of specific threat cues. It was found that, compared to responses to social threat cues, patients had reduced detection latencies to probes presented when they were actively reading stimuli pertaining to physical threat. This effect was not observed among control subjects. These results are consistent with the view that panic patients maintain a cognitive set that biases attention towards the processing of physical threat.

References (31)

  • D.M. Clark et al.

    Test of a cognitive theory of panic

  • A. Ehlers et al.

    Selective processing of threat cues in subjects with panic attacks

    Cognition and Emotion

    (1988)
  • M.W. Eysenck

    Anxiety and attention

    Anxiety Research

    (1988)
  • E.B. Foa

    What cognitions differentiate panic disorders from other anxiety disorders?

  • E.B. Foa et al.

    Emotional processing offear: Exposure to corrective information

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1986)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Associations between emotional symptoms and self-reported aberrant driving behaviors in older adults

      2019, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      The panic subscale was also related to worse self-reported overall driving. Individuals with anxiety disorders such as panic disorder have been found to make more driving errors compae panic disorder demonstrate increased attention bias towards physical threat cues (e.g., potential for motor vehicle crashes) (Asmundson et al., 1992) as well as towards internal physical sensations (e.g., heart palpitations, sweating) (Schmidt et al., 1997). Thus, individuals who experience panic or are diagnosed with panic disorder may be more likely to exhibit poorer overall driving performance because of distracted driving due to these attention biases.

    • Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?

      2019, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      In summary, an ABT is inferred from the speeding of a motor response (button or key press) to an emotionally neutral probe that appears in the location vacated by a threat stimulus (facial expression or word) relative to RTs to a neutral probe that appears in the location vacated by an emotionally neutral or positive stimulus. Variants of the dot probe paradigm have provided evidence for ABT in social anxiety disorder (e.g., Mogg, Philippot, & Bradley, 2004), panic disorder (e.g., Asmundson, Sandler, Wilson, & Walker, 1992), spider fear (e.g., Mogg & Bradley, 2006), and GAD (e.g., MacLeod et al., 1986). Most studies on ABT have involved inference from RTs to probes replacing threat cues.

    • Mobile attachment: Separation from the mobile phone induces physiological and behavioural stress and attentional bias to separation-related stimuli

      2017, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The neutral and the general negative words were selected from a 480-word pool used by Simor, Pajkossy, Horváth, and Bódizs (2012). Separation-related and physical threat words were collected from the literature (e.g. Asmundson, Sandler, Wilson, & Walker, 1992; Lundh & Czyzykow-Czarnocka, 2001). The collected words (N = 115; 20 separation-related, 22 physical threat, 25 general negative, and 48 neutral words) were rated for valence by laypersons not involved in the tests (N = 154, each was randomly assigned approximately 45 words from the 115 to rate; resulting in approximately 50 ratings per word).

    • Attentional bias in untreated panic disorder

      2011, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although patients with panic disorder (PD) show no deficits in general information processing (Kaplan et al., 2006) a large body of evidence suggests that they tend to selectively and automatically direct their attention towards threat stimuli, and that they tend to preferentially interpret ambiguous stimuli in a negative way (Ehlers et al., 1988; Clark et al., 1997; Lundh et al., 1999; Lim and Kim, 2005; Teachman et al., 2007). However, while a number of studies on PD, for instance, report vigilance for panic-related words in a verbal dot-probe task (Asmundson et al., 1992) or biased processing of facial expressions (Lundh et al., 1998), other studies using identical or similar paradigms have not been able to find panic-specific processing (Asmundson and Stein, 1994; Kessler et al., 2007). One reason for these inconsistencies in results might be that the effects of medication or psychotherapy have been widely neglected in cognitive bias research in PD so far.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors would like to thank Dr. Colin Ross for providing access to his patients, and Dr. Ron Norton for his helpful comments.

    View full text