The consequences of generation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90031-RGet rights and content

Abstract

Seven experiments are reported showing that encoding conditions producing a typical generation effect (better memory for generated than for previously read items) in cued recall and in recognition produce a negative generation effect (better memory for previously read than for generated items) in free recall, as well as a clustering advantage for the previously read items. Taken together, the experiments supported the hypothesis that generation enhanced stimulus-response and/or response-specific processing, but interfered with response-relational processing (i.e., associating responses in the list). In addition, this interference effect was caused by subject failure, in the generate conditions, to process the response-relational information after generating the targets, despite ample time to do so. The results are discussed in relation to both the multifactor theories of the generation effect and the transfer-appropriate procedures approach to explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit tests of memory.

References (28)

  • F.S. Bellezza et al.

    Organizational and semantic elaboration in free recall

    Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Learning and Memory

    (1977)
  • T.A. Blaxton

    Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1989)
  • D.J. Burns

    The generation effect: A test between single- and multifactor theories

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1990)
  • J.M. Gardiner

    Generation and priming effects in word-fragment completion

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH43981-01.

    View full text