Metrical phonology in speech production

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90007-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The theory of metrical phonology has been devised in an attempt to capture a variety of aspects of rhythmic patterns in speech. To date, however, very few of the theory's claims have been tested empirically. In this study, assertions made by E. O. Selkirk (1984, Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) and by B. Hayes (1984, Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 15, pp. 33–74) are tested in five experiments of English speech production. In each experiment, a different group of speakers produced short phrases or sentences containing key words which may undergo stress retraction, depending on the stress pattern of the following word. The stress patterns of the key words were assessed by perceptual evaluation and by acoustical analysis of fundamental frequency and segmental duration. The tests uniformly fail to provide support for claims about stress clashing and retraction in English, whereas other results are in accord with previous acoustical studies.

References (29)

  • H.H. Clark

    The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1973)
  • G. Cooper et al.

    The rhythmic structure of music

    (1960)
  • W.E. Cooper

    Review of E. O. Selkirk, Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure

    Studies in Language

    (1986)
  • W.E. Cooper et al.

    Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1985)
  • W.E. Cooper et al.

    Planning speech: A picture's word's worth

    Acta Psychologica

    (1985)
  • W.E. Cooper et al.

    Fundamental frequency in sentence production

    (1981)
  • D.B. Fry

    Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1955)
  • Halle, M., & Vergnaud, J.-R. Three dimensional phonology. Book in...
  • M. Halle et al.

    Three dimensional phonology

    Journal of Linguistic Research

    (1980)
  • B. Hayes

    Extrametricality and English stress

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1982)
  • B. Hayes

    A grid-based theory of English meter

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1983)
  • B. Hayes

    The phonology of rhythm in English

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1984)
  • P. Kiparsky

    Metrical structure assignments is cyclic

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1979)
  • P. Kiparsky

    From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology

  • Cited by (36)

    • The online effect of clash is durational lengthening, not prominence shift: Evidence from Italian

      2022, Journal of Phonetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Under this account, whenever two grid marks of a certain level are too close to each other, the first one is deleted, altering the prominence pattern of the word (Fig. 1c). This reformulation was meant to align theoretical accounts with the lack of experimental evidence compatible with stress shift (Cooper & Eady, 1986; Farnetani & Kori, 1983; Horne, 1990). Within the deletion account, some scholars have hypothesized that a clash arises not from adjacency of stressed syllables (or strong grid marks), but from the adjacency of pitch accents, that is, prominent events at the phrasal rather than at the word level (Beckman & Edwards, 1994; Bolinger, 1986; Shattuck-Hufnagel et al., 1994).

    • In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research

      2015, Journal of Phonetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nonsense words or speech-like utterances such as iterative ‘dadada’ productions (e.g., Andreeva, Barry, & Steiner, 2007; Barry, Andreeva, & Steiner, 2007). Carefully designed sentences varying in one word or stress position, often used to investigate prosodic focus or strategies of prominence annotation (to name very few: Arnold, Möbius, & Wagner, 2011; Arnold, Wagner, & Möbius, 2011; Cho & Keating, 2009; Cooper & Eady, 1986; Heldner & Strangert, 2001; Jensen & Tøndering, 2005; Samlowski, Möbius, & Wagner, 2014; Sluijter & van Heuven, 1996). Balanced corpora based on read aloud, isolated, meaningful sentences as well as stories (Fant & Kruckenberg, 1989; Heuft, 1999; Kochanski et al., 2005; Portele & Heuft, 1997; Streefkerk, 2002; Tamburini & Caini, 2005).

    • The relevance of rhythmical alternation in language processing: An ERP study on English compounds

      2014, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the existing results to date are not fully conclusive. Different studies claimed that there is no acoustic evidence for a real shift of prominence within potential stress shift items (e.g., Cooper & Eady, 1986; Grabe & Warren, 1995; Vogel, Bunnell, & Hoskins, 1995). However, listeners declare to perceive proper stress shifts regularly, albeit only when presented in a shift-triggering context (e.g., ́TV in TV soaps but T́V when presented in isolation; Grabe & Warren, 1995).

    • What Is Musical Prosody?

      2006, Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory
      Citation Excerpt :

      Languages of the world do not display the same degree of regularity in production or perception. Interstress intervals tend to vary as a function of the material within the interval, although evidence of a tendency toward isochrony is seen in some studies when principle determinants of duration (sentential context, lexical content, etc.) are controlled for (Cooper & Eady, 1986; Kelly & Bock, 1988). Differences between speech and music in their degree of temporal regularity raise the possibility that prosodic variation may be constrained differently.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by NIH Grant NS 20071 and by a Fulbright fellowship. Portions of this work were presented at the December 1985 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in Seattle, Washington.

    View full text