Elsevier

Journal of Dentistry

Volume 15, Issue 6, December 1987, Pages 242-248
Journal of Dentistry

Original research report
Dentine hypersensitivity: the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque

https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(87)90045-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The features of dentine hypersensitivity have been presented largely in descriptive form and there is only limited information on the intraoral distribution of the condition. Additionally, there have been conflicting reports of both high and low plaque accumulation at sites of hypersensitivity. This study investigates the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque in a group of 92 patients diagnosed as suffering moderate to severe dentine hypersensitivity affecting several teeth. The group was relatively homogeneous and there was no significant variation in recession, sensitivity or plaque scores between subjects. Tooth number (1–28) highly significantly influenced all parameters. In three-way analyses of variance to identify the effects of jaw, side and tooth number in a segment (1–7) almost all parameters were significantly influenced, however:

  • 1.

    1. The dominant factors affecting degree of recession were side and tooth number.

  • 2.

    2. The dominant factor affecting sensitivity was side.

  • 3.

    3. The dominant factors affecting buccal plaque were side and tooth number.

  • 4.

    4. The dominant factor affecting lingual plaque was jaw.

Two- and three-way interactions were, for the most part, also significant. The correlation matrix revealed significant positive correlations for recession with sensitivity and significant negative correlations for recession and sensitivity with buccal plaque. The findings indicate that the intraoral distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque in this selected population is complex, being partly fitted by a main-effects model, and suggest that tooth cleaning is one of several major factors which influence the occurrence and distribution of dentine hypersensitivity.

References (30)

  • J. Flynn et al.

    The incidence of ‘hypersensitive’ teeth in the West of Scotland

    J. Dent.

    (1985)
  • E. Absi et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity. The patency of dentinal tubules in nonsensitivie and sensitive dentine

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1987)
  • M. Addy et al.

    Effects of sugared and sugar-free chewing gum on the accumulation of plaque and debris on the teeth

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1982)
  • M. Addy et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity: the effects of acids and dietary compounds on burred and root planed dentine

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1987)
  • A.G. Alexander

    A study of the distribution of supra and subgingival calculus, bacterial plaque and gingival inflammation in the mouth of 400 individuals

    J. Periodontol.

    (1971)
  • M. Brannstrom

    A hydrodynamic mechanism in the transmission of pain producing stimuli through the dentine

  • M. Brannstrom

    The surface of sensitive dentine

    Odont. Revy

    (1965)
  • L.A. Buckley

    The relationships between malocclusion gingival inflammation, plaque and calculus

    J. Periodontol.

    (1981)
  • A.I. Chazens

    The management of pain and sensitivity

  • P. Dowell et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity. A review. I. Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1983)
  • P. Dowell et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity. Aetiology, differential diagnosis and management

    Br. Dent. J.

    (1985)
  • A. Gesell et al.

    Youth: the Years from Ten to Sixteen

    (1956)
  • W.J. Gorman

    Prevalence and aetiology of gingival recession

    J. Periodontol.

    (1967)
  • H. Graf et al.

    Morbidity, prevalence and intra-oral distribution of hypersensitive teeth

    J. Dent. Res.

    (1977)
  • D.A. Grant

    Orbans Periodontics

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text