Background material for the workshop on QALYs
Conceptual and methodological problems in research on the quality of life in clinical medicine

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(89)90295-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This introductory paper discusses three issues: theory, validity of measurement and benefits of assessment. It is argued that the conceptual entity ‘quality of life’ remains ill-defined, although researchers commonly agree on its multi-dimensional nature. The selectivity of dimensions under study is illustrated by referring to recent work on the quality of life in cancer and in cardiovascular disease. Despite conceptual weaknesses, promising developments are apparent in research methodology. The issue is discussed with special reference to the convergent and discriminant validity of some widely used research methods. Improvements in therapy and patient-physician relationships are considered among the major benefits of assessing the quality of life in clinical practice. In conclusion, this field of research, if based on appropriate theory, opens important opportunities for cross-fertilization between advanced medicine and the social sciences.

References (37)

  • M. Fowlie et al.

    Quality of life—a review from the literature

    Fam. Pract.

    (1987)
  • W.B. Stason et al.

    Allocation of resources to manage hypertension

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1977)
  • A. Williams

    Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting

    Br. med. J.

    (1985)
  • M.J. Buxton

    Study of the Cost and Benefit of the Heart Transplant Programmes at Harefield and Papworth Hospitals

    (1985)
  • S.M. Hunt

    Measuring Health Status

    (1986)
  • Cited by (84)

    • The relationship between dispositional gratitude and quality of life: The mediating role of perceived stress and mental health

      2019, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, an ability to decrease stress is considerably important for better health (Hoge et al., 2017). Quality of life and wellness refer to positive subjective states against illness and are multidimensional, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual (Meiselman, 2016; Siegrist & Junge, 1989). Non-physical factors (e.g., well-being) play a very important role in quality of life (Bernard et al., 2017).

    • Assessing agreement between terminally ill cancer patients' reports of their quality of life and family caregiver and palliative care physician proxy ratings

      2011, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consequently, many argue that QoL should be the main outcome measure for the evaluation of palliative care.2–5 Although QoL assessments are best provided by patients themselves,5–9 40%–70% of terminally ill patients become unable to complete self-assessment measures.10–16 In such cases, proxy ratings are an essential alternative approach to evaluating QoL, although their utility depends on the extent to which the proxy can accurately reflect the patient’s experience.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text