Background material for the workshop on QALYsConceptual and methodological problems in research on the quality of life in clinical medicine
References (37)
- et al.
The quality of life of cancer patients. A review from the literature
Soc. Sci. Med.
(1985) - et al.
Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: a review and critique
Soc. Sci. Med.
(1981) Evaluating the impact of medical treatment on the quality of life: a 5-year update
Soc. Sci. Med.
(1988)Implications of measures of quality of life for policy development
J. chron. Dis.
(1987)Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life
J. chron. Dis.
(1987)Quality of life from epidemiologic perspective
J. chron. Dis.
(1987)Depression and body image following mastectomy and lumpectomy
J. chron. Dis.
(1987)Clinimetrics
- et al.
Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular disease
J. chron. Dis.
(1987)
Quality of life—a review from the literature
Fam. Pract.
Allocation of resources to manage hypertension
New Engl. J. Med.
Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting
Br. med. J.
Study of the Cost and Benefit of the Heart Transplant Programmes at Harefield and Papworth Hospitals
Measuring Health Status
Cited by (84)
The relationship between dispositional gratitude and quality of life: The mediating role of perceived stress and mental health
2019, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :On the other hand, an ability to decrease stress is considerably important for better health (Hoge et al., 2017). Quality of life and wellness refer to positive subjective states against illness and are multidimensional, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual (Meiselman, 2016; Siegrist & Junge, 1989). Non-physical factors (e.g., well-being) play a very important role in quality of life (Bernard et al., 2017).
Health-related quality of life in patients treated for ovarian cancer: Tools and issues
2015, Gynecologie Obstetrique et FertiliteAssessing agreement between terminally ill cancer patients' reports of their quality of life and family caregiver and palliative care physician proxy ratings
2011, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementCitation Excerpt :Consequently, many argue that QoL should be the main outcome measure for the evaluation of palliative care.2–5 Although QoL assessments are best provided by patients themselves,5–9 40%–70% of terminally ill patients become unable to complete self-assessment measures.10–16 In such cases, proxy ratings are an essential alternative approach to evaluating QoL, although their utility depends on the extent to which the proxy can accurately reflect the patient’s experience.
Health-related quality of life profiles in adolescents and young adults with chronic conditions
2023, Quality of Life ResearchA Framework for Optimal Design Life as Applied to Wind Energy System Operation
2023, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies