Review
Neonatal imitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90003-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The historical-theoretical background of the question whether neonates can imitate facial gestures is sketched, and 26 recent experiments are examined. The examination of the evidence indicates that the modeling of Tongue Protrusion increases the rate of tongue protrusion responses in neonates. For other individual gestures, there is not enough research to draw clear conclusions. (a) In 12 out of 23 experiments the rates of tongue protrusion were significantly higher in conditions in which Tongue Protrusion was modeled than in control conditions. In all 11 experiments in which no effect was obtained the total demonstration durations were 40 sec or less. By comparison, no single experiment that had a total demonstration duration of 60 sec or more failed to obtain an effect. (b) The rate of tongue protrusion averaged across experiments was significantly higher in the Tongue Protrusion condition than in control conditions. (c) Results interpreted as due to neonatal imitation of facial emotional expressions could reflect observers' inferences from the infants' eye movements. On the theoretical level, it is argued that the Tongue Protrusion effect need not be interpreted as imitation. It could be due to an increase in the tongue protrusion gesture in the response period following its (assumed) inhibition in the modeling period by orienting-attentional responses.

References (64)

  • E. Abravanel et al.

    Exploring the presence of imitation during early infancy

    Child Development

    (1984)
  • G. Allport

    The historical background of modern social psychology

  • M. Anisfeld

    Interpreting “imitative” responses in early infancy

    Science

    (1979)
  • M. Anisfeld
  • S.E. Asch
  • J.M. Baldwin
  • G.C. Carpenter

    Visual regard of moving and stationary faces in early infancy

    Merrill-Palmer Quarterly

    (1974)
  • J. Colombo et al.

    Behavioral state as a lead variable in neonatal research

    Merrill-Palmer Quarterly

    (1987)
  • I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt

    Human ethology: Concepts and implications for the sciences of man

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1979)
  • T.M. Field et al.

    Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by term and preterm neonates

    Infant Behavior and Development

    (1983)
  • T.M. Field et al.

    Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by neonates

    Science

    (1982)
  • R. Fontaine

    Les imitations precoces: Problemes methodologiques et theoriques

    Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive

    (1984)
  • J. Gardner et al.

    A note on selective imitation by a six-week-old infant

    Child Development

    (1970)
  • P. Guillaume
  • L.A. Hayes et al.

    Neonatal imitation: Fact or artifact?

    Developmental Psychology

    (1981)
  • M. Heimann

    Imitation in early infancy: Individual differences among infants 0–3 months of age

    (1988)
  • M. Heimann et al.

    Neonatal imitation of tongue protrusion and mouth opening: Methodological aspects and evidence of early individual differences

    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

    (1989)
  • M. Heimann et al.

    Imitative reactions among 14–21-day-old infants

    Infant Mental Health Journal

    (1985)
  • S.W. Jacobson

    Matching behavior in the young infant

    Child Development

    (1979)
  • S.W. Jacobson et al.

    Interpreting “imitative” responses in early infancy

    Science

    (1979)
  • M. Kaitz et al.

    A reexamination of newborns' ability to imitate facial expressions

    Developmental Psychology

    (1988)
  • K. Kaye
  • Cited by (0)

    This review was supported in part by Grant HD26776 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    View full text