Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(92)90116-PGet rights and content

Abstract

A subset of the published research on mood-congruent memory in normal nondepressed, subclinically depressed, clinically depressed, induced depressed, and induced elated persons is examined with meta-analytic techniques. We estimated the magnitude of mood-congruent recall for these mood states, examined their robustness, and studied within each mood state the extent to which the strength of mood-congruent recall was related to self-referenced encoding and mood intensity. Asymmetric recall favoring positive stimuli appears to be part of the normative pattern of memory performance among individuals that have been labeled normal nondepressed (dh = .15; p < .001); subclinically depressed individuals show symmetric recall of positively and negatively valenced material (dh = − .02; p > .20). Clinically depressed, induced depressed, and induced elated subjects display mood congruent recall (dh, = − .19; p < .05; dh = − .12, p < .05; dh = .08; p < .10). With the exception of induced elated mood, effect estimates derived from different studies are robust in that sampling error accounts for the entire variability among effect estimates obtained from different studies. In studies on induced-elated mood, self-referent processing was associated with stronger mood-congruent recall as compared to other studies. Caveats and implications for future research on mood and memory are discussed.

References (44)

  • C.R. Brewin

    Cognitive foundations of clinical psychology

    (1988)
  • C.S. Carver et al.

    Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view

    Psychological Review

    (1990)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • S.G. Gilligan et al.

    Cognitive consequences of emotional arousal

  • G.V. Glass

    Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research

    Educational Research

    (1976)
  • G.V. Glass et al.

    Meta-analysis in social research

    (1981)
  • M.S. Greenberg et al.

    Depression versus anxiety: Differences in self- and other-schemata

  • E.A. Haggard

    Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance

    (1958)
  • L. Hasher et al.

    On mood variation and memory: Reply to Isen (1985), Ellis (1985), and Mayer & Bower (1985)

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1985)
  • L.V. Hedges

    Fitting categorical models to effect sizes from a series of experiments

    Journal of Educational Statistics

    (1982)
  • L.V. Hedges

    Estimation of effect size under nonrandom sampling: The effects of censoring studies yielding statistically insignificant mean differences

    Journal of Educational Statistics

    (1984)
  • L.V. Hedges et al.

    Statistical methods for meta-analysis

    (1984)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text