Observations on the recovery of sensation following inferior alveolar nerve injuries

https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(88)90161-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The recovery of sensation to the lower lip and chin following unilateral inferior alveolar or mental nerve injuries has been examined in 21 adult patients for periods of up to 45 months. Sensory testing was performed using light touch, pin prick and thermal stimuli as well as testing for sharp/blunt differentiation, localisation and two-point discrimination. The area of anaesthesia to light touch stimuli had disappeared by 4 months after nerve compression and by 3.5–8 months after nerve section, but persisted after nerve section if nerve regeneration was impeded. In this latter group there was a significant reduction (mean 65%) in the area of anaesthesia by I year post injury and this would be consistent with the development of a collateral reinnervation. Nerve section injuries and 46% of the nerve compression injuries resulted in a persistent sensory abnormality. The tests most likely to reveal this abnormality were localisation, pin prick threshold and two-point discrimination.

References (37)

Cited by (163)

  • Dentoalveolar Surgery

    2023, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Management of Traumatic Trigeminal and Facial Nerve Injuries

    2021, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    One study showed that, in 66.7% of patients with posttreatment neurosensory disturbance, the deficit was permanent.73 Compression injuries of the IAN may result in the most significant neurosensory deficits.75 Neurosensory testing (NST) should be performed for patients with neurosensory changes to determine the degree of sensory impairment, monitor recovery, and to assist with clinical decision making and the need for surgical intervention.76–78

  • Diagnosis and Management of Lingual Nerve Injuries

    2021, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, it is important to differentiate what patients report as “painful” or “disturbing” from a numbness that is annoying or frustrating. Also, the patient’s perception of a functional deficit is relevant because this factor typically motivates patients to consider surgical treatment.3,4 Patients with a lingual nerve injury should be questioned regarding the presence of tongue biting; drooling; burning of the tongue; speech difficulties; difficulty in chewing, swallowing, or drinking; an inability to distinguish between excessively hot and cold foods; difficulty with kissing or being intimate with a partner; and pain or limitation when performing routine dental hygiene.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text