Locus of control, neuroticism, and stressors: Combined influences on reported physical illness
References (42)
- et al.
Generalized locus of control: An analysis of factor analytic data
Personality and Individual Differences
(1988) Personality, cancer, and cardiovascular disease: A causal analysis
Personality and Individual Differences
(1985)- et al.
Perceived control: Distinct but related levels of analysis?
Personality and Individual Differences
(1994) - et al.
The relationship between coping and emotion: Implications for theory and research
Social Science and Medicine
(1988) - et al.
Stress and well-being: The buffering role of locus of control beliefs
Social Science and Medicine
(1984) - et al.
Personality as modifier of the life event-distress relationship: A longitudinal structural equation model
Personality and Individual Differences
(1988) - et al.
Health locus of control scales
- et al.
Stress responsivity: The role of individual differences
Personality and Individual Differences
(1994) - et al.
Measures of neuroticism and disease status in coronary angiography patients
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
(1992) - et al.
Control and intrusive memories as possible determinants of chronic stress
Psychosomatic Medicine
(1993)
Coping as a personality process: A prospective study
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Personality and problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to everyday Stressors
Journal of Personality
Negative reactions to increases in personal control
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How coping mediates the effects of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
A global measure of perceived stress
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Negative life events, perceived stress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Stress and infectious disease in humans
Psychological Bulletin
Personality, stress, and coping: Some lessons from a decade of research
Does hardiness contribute to mental health during a stressful life situation? The roles of appraisal and coping
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (41)
Contribution of individual psychological and psychosocial factors to symptom severity and time-to-recovery after naturally-occurring acute infective illness: The Dubbo Infection Outcomes Study (DIOS)
2019, Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityCitation Excerpt :Our finding then of more internalised locus of control behaviour being associated with greater baseline severity of symptoms across all endophenotypes except mood is somewhat surprising. One possibility is that individuals with more extreme internal locus of control may become vulnerable in situations where such control cannot be exerted, leading to heightened physiological reactivity and symptom reporting (Horner, 1996). Alternatively, a non-linear association may exist between locus of control and symptom severity, whereby a balanced or moderate sense of internal control is more adaptive when faced with potentially uncontrollable situations, such as acute infective illnesses, than extreme loci of control.
Beyond the Big Five: The mediating role of goal orientation in the relationship between core self-evaluations and academic performance
2016, International Journal of Management EducationCitation Excerpt :Methodologically, however, in this study we utilize an uni-dimensional measurement approach to CSEs, as developed by Judge, Erez, Bono, and Thoresen (2003) who call for studies that consider CSEs as a single concept, as opposed to treating each of the four traits separately, due to the fact that in numerous studies the four core traits had been found to correlate strongly with one another and load on a single factor (e.g. Erez & Judge, 2001; Judge, Bono and Locke, 2000; Judge, Locke, Durham and Kruger, 1998). Traditionally, prior to this conceptualization, each of the four core traits had been treated as a separate variable without considering or discussing their interrelationships (e.g. Hojat, 1983; Horner, 1996). While it is crucial to acknowledge these interrelationships and to carry out research that evaluates the impact of CSEs as a whole on a variety of outcomes, including academic performance, which we strive for in this study, it is necessary to understand the nature of each of the four core traits that make up the CSEs construct.
Incremental variance of the core self-evaluation construct compared to fluid intelligence and personality traits in aspects of decision-making
2012, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :An analysis of the literature shows that extensive psychological research has been conducted on the separate traits that have a bearing on core self-evaluation but that relatively little research has been done on these traits together as a distinct construct (Judge et al., 1997). Where they have been considered together, they are usually treated as separate variables without seeing them as constituting a possible common framework (Horner, 1996). However, recent studies on self-esteem, self-efficacy, the tendency to have a negativistic cognitive/explanatory style and locus of control together (Judge et al., 1997, 2003) have found that these constructs constitute a single factor suggesting that they could be considered indicators of a latent construct of a higher order, namely the core self-evaluation construct.
Five-Factor Model facets differentially predict in-the-moment affect and cognitions
2012, Journal of Research in PersonalityCitation Excerpt :Surprisingly, Neuroticism and its facets were not related to one’s average level of perceived control over stressors. This contrasts with previous work repeatedly showing a strong, positive relationship between Neuroticism and external locus of control (e.g. Clarke, 2004; Greenspoon & Sasklofske, 2001; Horner, 1996); these previous studies, however, used trait measures of locus of control, while the current study used an in-the-moment measure of control over an identified stressor. External locus of control in high-Neuroticism individuals may represent a retrospective bias in their evaluation of the world; these individuals apparently do not accurately aggregate their in-the-moment perceptions of control over various situations encountered in daily life.
Comparison of personal behaviour styles in clinical depressed, non-clinical depressed and normal people
2011, Procedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesOn feeling in control: A biological theory for individual differences in control perception
2006, Brain and Cognition