Monitoring and blunting coping styles: The Miller behavioural style scale and its correlates, and the development of an alternative questionnaire

https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90257-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The present article presents two studies concerning the measurement of monitoring (information seeking under threat) and blunting (information avoidance) coping styles. Study 1 (n = 69) showed that the widely used Miller Behavioural Style Scale suffers from a number of weaknesses such as insufficient internal consistency, susceptibility to correlate with measures of anxiety and other psychopathology, poor quality of scenarios, and moderate face validity. In study 2 (n = 42), an alternative instrument is presented: the Monitoring-Blunting Questionnaire (MBQ). The MBQ has high face validity, good reliability, and is unrelated to trait anxiety. Furthermore, in a “thought experiment” some indications were found for the predictive validity of the MBQ.

References (27)

  • S.M. Gattuso et al.

    Coping with gastrointestinal endoscopy: Self-efficacy enhancement and coping style

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1992)
  • R. Ludwick-Rosenthal et al.

    Preparation for undergoing an invasive medical procedure: Interacting effects of information and coping style

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1993)
  • S.M. Miller

    Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Finding evidence of dispositional coping

      2006, Journal of Research in Personality
    • Psychosocial factors associated with perceived disease severity in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Relationship with information sources and attentional coping styles

      2005, Psychosomatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The patients were provided with definitions of monitoring and blunting and asked to indicate on a 10-point scale (0 = not at all, 10 = very much) the extent to which they would rely on each strategy to cope with each of 10 potentially threatening situations. A subscore was calculated for each coping choice by summing up the scores for the 10 situations.29 Scores for perceived severity from the visual analogue scale were expressed as means and standard deviations.

    • Effect of distraction and coping style on in vivo exposure for specific phobia of spiders

      2001, Behaviour Research and Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, another potential limitation was our use of the dichotomous version of the MBSS. Research suggests that the internal consistency of the dichotomous MBSS is not always acceptable (Muris, van Zuuren, de Jong, de Beurs, & Hanewald, 1994) and a 5-point version of the MBSS where participants indicate the extent to which each coping option is applicable to them (e.g., Muris, van Zuuren, & Merckelbach, 1993) is a stronger measure. Future research should also include a follow-up assessment, given evidence that a monitoring coping style may be associated with a greater risk of relapse (e.g., Muris et al., 1993a) and that distraction may interfere with the maintenance of treatment effects (Haw & Dickerson, 1998).

    • Relations Between Personality and Coping: A Meta-Analysis

      2007, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was part of a dissertation accepted by the University of Amsterdam in fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

    View full text