Reliability and validity of Izard's differential emotions scale
References (34)
- et al.
On the arbitrary distinction between states and traits
J. Person. soc. Psychol.
(1981) - et al.
Just as arbitrary as ever: comments on Zuckerman's rejoinder
J. Person. soc. Psychol.
(1983) - et al.
Introductory Multivariate Analysis: for Educational, Psychological, and Social Research
(1975) - et al.
Factor extraction: an examination of three methods
Person. Study Gp Behav.
(1982) Delimitation of state-trait curiosity in relation to state anxiety and learning task performance
Aust. J. Educ.
(1979)- et al.
Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research
(1966) The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences
(1978)The psychometry of objective motivation measurement: a response to the critique of Cooper and Kline
Br. J. educ. Psychol.
(1982)- et al.
Experimental and Quasi-experimentation: Design Analysis Issues for Field Settings
(1979) Levels of meaning for infant emotions
Personality Structure and Measurement
Validation of the Differential Emotions Scale in 613 mothers
Motivn. Emotion
The Face of Emotion
Patterns of Emotions
Human Emotions
On the development of emotions and emotion-cognition relationships in infancy
Emotions as motivations: an evolutionary-developmental perspective
Cited by (60)
Contributions of socioeconomic status and cognition to emotion processes and internalizing psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review
2023, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsBrain-based concealed memory detection is driven mainly by orientation to salient items
2021, CortexCitation Excerpt :Participants indicated to what extent they currently experienced each emotion on a scale of 1–5 (1 = not at all, 5 = a lot). Although internal consistency of the individual subscales varies and ranges from .56 to .88, the scales are stable over time and are significantly correlated with personality variables and outcomes (Boyle, 1984; Izard et al., 1993). Once the differential emotions scale was completed, participants in both sessions were explained that they would see a fast-paced presentation of different items, including their own personal identity items (e.g., first name, last name).
The effect of political ideology and message frame on donation intent during the COVID-19 pandemic
2021, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :Specifically, participants were asked to indicate how they felt at the moment, using a 20-item, four-point scale (α = 0.89; Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1970; see Appendix B). To exclude alternative explanations of other state-based emotions, participants indicated their state-based emotions including anger, disgust, fear, desire, and relaxed (Boyle, 1984, 1986; see Appendix B). Finally, as a manipulation check, we measured participants’ perceptions regarding whether the message specified COVID-19 related statistical/identifiable victim information, depending on experimental conditions.
Self-Regulation
2016, Encyclopedia of Mental Health: Second EditionConfirmatory factor analysis of the Feeding Emotions Scale. A measure of parent emotions in the context of feeding
2015, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :The negative emotionality composite reflects nine discrete subscales (inner-directed hostility, shyness, disgust, shame, anger, sadness, contempt, guilt and fear). Reliability and validity have been established for the DES (Boyle, 1984). The Caregiver's Feeding Styles Questionnaire (CFSQ) was used to assess parent feeding styles (Hughes et al., 2005).
Measures of Affect Dimensions
2015, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs
- ∗
Present address: Institute of Catholic Education, Oakleigh Campus, 17 Castlebar Rd, Oakleigh, 3166 Victoria, Australia.