Main article
P3 responses to prosodic stimuli in adult autistic subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(91)90139-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Autistic persons are known to have serious abnormalities in speech prosody. The present study attempted to ascertain whether autistic persons could discriminate and/or recognize prosodic contrasts in auditory stimuli. A group of 11 adult autistic subjects with normal IQ and an age-matched group of normal subjects were studied electrophysiologically and behaviorally during presentations of prosodic and phonemic stimuli. The cognitive P3 potential was recorded in response to rare (20%)/frequent (80%) presentations of phonemic stimuli, ‘ba/pa’, linguistic-prosodic stimuli, ‘Bob’. (statement)/‘Bob?’ (question), and emotional-prosodic stimuli, ‘Bob’ (happy)/‘Bob’ (happy)/’Bob’ (angry). Behaviorally, auditory discrimination was tested by requiring a button-press response to each presentation of the rare target stimulus and cognitive association was tested by requiring a match between the verbalized stimulus and an appropriate picture/word.

Contrary to our hypothesis, the autistic subjects generally showed normal P3 responses to all stimuli and performed at a normal level in all behavioral tests. However, a significant autistic P3 response to the phoneme ‘pa’ was not demonstrated. This surprising result was reexamined and shown to reflect an unusually large autistic response to ‘pa’ as the frequent stimulus in the first recording block, this initial hyper-reactivity prevented a ‘frequent/rare’ differential when ‘pa’ was presented as the rare stimulus in a later recording block. In the P3 latency window, both the autistic and control groups showed the largest amplitude responses to emotional-prosodic stimuli; neither the N1 nor P2 showed these stimulus effects. Thus, ‘emotional sounds’ appear to be particularly effective in activating the neural substrate of the P3 generator system.

Overall, these data indicate remarkably normal P3 and behavioral processing of prosodic stimuli by the high-functioning autistic subjects of this study.

References (29)

  • C. Baltaxe et al.

    Communication deficits in the adolescent with autism, schizophrenia, and language-learning disabilities

  • J.S. Buchwald

    Animal models of event-related potentials

  • J. Buchwald et al.

    Abnormal P1 potentials in autistic subjects

    Soc. Neurosci. Abst.

    (1988)
  • W.J. Chambers et al.

    The assessment of affection disorders in children and adolescents by semi-structured interview. Test-retest reliability of the schedule for affection disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children, present episode version

    Arch. Gen. Psychiat.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Spontaneous but not explicit processing of positive sentences impaired in Asperger's syndrome: Pupillometric evidence

      2011, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, while explicit task performance may not be impaired in AS, two recent electrophysiological (ERP) studies (Korpilahti et al., 2007; Kujala, Lepistö, Nieminen-von Wendt, Näätänen, & Näätänen, 2005) suggest fundamental processing differences between AS and non-clinical participants in early processing stages (e.g. reduced N1, Korpilahti et al., 2007). But then again, there is also evidence that later processing stages may not differ between individuals with ASD and non-clinical controls in an emotion discrimination task (Erwin et al., 1991). Thus, part of the reason for the inconsistencies in emotional prosody perception could be demands on explicit versus implicit processing, and current research has examined the effect of experimental task set-up directly in high functioning individuals with ASD.

    • Audiologic and electrophysiologic evaluation in children with psychiatric disorders

      2009, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      When we compared the P300 latency values from GC and GA, there were no statistically significant difference. This finding corroborated those presented by Niwa et al.25, Erwin et al.26 and Ferri et al.27. Comparing the P300 wave latency values from GC and GSA, statistically significant differences were found.

    • Cortical auditory evoked potentials in autism: A review

      2004, International Journal of Psychophysiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by USPHS Grants HD05958 and HD04612.

    1

    The authors wish to thank Andrew Russell, M.D., Linda Bott, Ph.D. and Cathy Sammons, M.S.W. for their diagnostic evaluation of the autistic subjects.

    View full text