Scientific article
Time preference, the discounted utility model and health

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(95)00031-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The constant rate discounted utility model is commonly used to represent intertemporal preferences in health care program evaluations. This paper examines the appropriateness of this model, and argues that the model fails both normatively and descriptively as a representation of individual intertemporal preferences for health outcomes. Variable rate discounted utility models are more flexible, but still require restrictive assumptions and may lead to dynamically inconsistent behaviour. The paper concludes by considering two ways of incorporating individual intertemporal preferences in health care program evaluations that allow for complementarity of health outcomes in different time periods.

References (53)

  • G. Debreu

    Representation of preference ordering by a numerical function

  • G. Debreu

    Topological methods in cardinal utility theory

  • P.C. Fishburn

    Independence in utility theory with whole product sets

    Operations Research

    (1965)
  • P.C. Fishburn

    Utility theory for decision making

    (1970)
  • P.C. Fishburn et al.

    Time preference

    International Economic Review

    (1982)
  • A. Gafni

    The standard gamble method: What is being measured and how it is interpreted

    Health Services Research

    (1994)
  • A. Gafni

    Time in health: Can we measure individual's pure time preference?

    Medical Decision Making

    (1995)
  • A. Gafni et al.

    Risk attitude and time preference in health

    Management Science

    (1984)
  • I. Gilboa

    Expectation and variation in multi-period decisions

    Econometrica

    (1989)
  • P. Hammond

    Changing tastes and coherent dynamic choice

    Review of Economic Studies

    (1976)
  • N.E. Jensen

    An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory: I. Utility functions

    Swedish Journal of Economics

    (1967)
  • D. Kahneman et al.

    Economic analysis and the psychology of utility: Applications to compensation policy

  • R.L. Keeney et al.

    Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs

    (1976)
  • T.C. Koopmans

    Stationary ordinal utility and impatience

    Econometrica

    (1960)
  • T.C. Koopmans

    Representation of preference orderings over time

  • T.C. Koopmans et al.

    Stationary utility and time perspective

    Econometrica

    (1964)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Neural correlates of delay discount alterations in addiction and psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging studies

      2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, from a clinical point of view, an excessive DD, causing a strong behavioral bias toward a smaller immediate reward, may underlie impulsive traits (Bickel et al., 2012; Joutsa et al., 2015). The concept of DD was first introduced by economists, as a theoretical model called “Discounted Utility Model” during the first half of the last century (Bleichrodt and Gafni, 1996). Economists suggested that DD is processed based on consumption profiles known as continuity, transitivity, and completeness (Attema et al., 2018; Heilmann, 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text