Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 37, Issue 3, June 1991, Pages 219-227
Psychiatry Research

Evaluating cognitive impairment in depression with the Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery: Severity correlates and comparisons with nonpsychiatric controls

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90058-WGet rights and content

Abstract

Depressed patients often complain of memory and attentional difficulties, and some research suggests an increased incidence of neuropsychological impairment in depression. Yet, many prior studies contain methodological problems, including the following: (1) inclusion of medicated patients, (2) small sample sizes, and (3) tests with unknown psychometric properties. We administered the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB) to 28 unmedicated inpatients who met Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depression. Twenty of the 28 patients were given additional cognitive measures (e.g., Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Benton Tests). The depressed patients performed similarly to an age- and education-matched nonpsychiatric reference sample. When data for a subset of the most severely depressed patients were analyzed separately, these patients too were found to perform similarly to matched controls. There were no relationships between Hamilton rating scale measures of depression severity and any cognitive measures among the depressed patients. The results suggest that cognitive functioning in depressed patients does not differ significantly from that in carefully matched controls and is independent of symptom severity.

References (38)

  • D. Delis et al.

    The assessment of aphasia with the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: A case critique

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1982)
  • J. Endicott et al.

    A diagnostic interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1978)
  • A. Georgotas et al.

    Dexamethasone suppression in dementia, depression, and normal aging

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • C. Golden et al.

    Analytic techniques in the interpretation of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery

    International Journal of Neuropsychology

    (1982)
  • C. Golden et al.

    Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Forms I and II

    (1985)
  • M. Hamilton

    A rating scale for depression

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

    (1960)
  • R. Hart et al.

    Psychomotor slowing and subcortical-type dysfunction in depression

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • G. Henry et al.

    Influence of affective states and psychoactive drugs on verbal learning and memory

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1973)
  • J. Moses et al.

    A critical review of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery literature: I. Reliability

    International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology

    (1987)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Suicidal behavior in treatment resistant major depressive disorder patients treated with transmagnetic stimulation(TMS) and its relationship with cognitive functions

      2020, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it has been accepted as a form of treatment that is considered to have higher priority in the treatment algorithms of patients with certain clinical features such as suicidal behavior. With proven efficacy in patients with TRD (Avery et al., 2006; O'Reardon et al. 2007, Fitzgerald and Daskalakis, 2011 and milder cognitive adverse effect profile (Deng et al., 2011; Miller et al., 1991; Golinkoff and Sweeney, 1989, Demir et al., 2000, Neu et al., 2001 Ravnkilde et al., 2002, Porter et al., 2003), TMS has the potential to be an alternative treatment to ECT (Lisanby et al., 2003; Moscrip et al., 2006; Kirov et al., 2008). In 2008, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a new treatment alternative for patients with TRD.

    • Pattern of impaired working memory during major depression

      2006, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      In order to determine the contribution of cognitive dysfunction to the presentation, experience, and treatment of MDD, it is imperative to consider: (1) evidence of specific cognitive dysfunctions in MDD; (2) if the profile of cognitive deficit observed in MDD is attributable to a common factor or mechanism; and (3) factors that may contribute to the presence/absence of cognitive dysfunction in depressed adults. Depression-associated deficits have been noted in psychomotor function (i.e. the collective mental processes leading to motor output; see Veiel, 1997 for a review), effortful information processing (see Hartlage et al., 1993 for review), information processing speed (Austin et al., 1999; Beats et al., 1996; Tsourtos et al., 2002), explicit long-term memory (Bazin et al., 1994; Cassens et al., 1990; Denny and Hunt, 1992; Ilsley et al., 1995; MacQueen et al., 2002), short-term memory (Austin et al., 1992; Austin et al., 1999; Beats et al., 1996; Brand et al., 1992; Brown et al., 1994; Elliott et al., 1996; Kessing, 1998; Moritz et al., 2001; Porter et al., 2003; Ravnkilde et al., 2002), and executive function, including: attention (Grossman et al., 1993; Miller et al., 1991; Moritz et al., 2002; Porter et al., 2003; Purcell et al., 1997; Ravnkilde et al., 2002; Trichard et al., 1995); decision-making (Murphy et al., 2001) and planning (Beats et al., 1996; Elliott et al., 1996; Porter et al., 2003). It would, therefore, appear that there is a reliable deficit in cognitive function in adults with MDD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text